BACKGROUND: Causes of autism are unknown. Associations with maternal nutritional factors and their interactions with gene variants have not been reported. METHODS: Northern California families were enrolled from 2003 to 2009 in the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) population-based case-control study. Children aged 24-60 months were evaluated and confirmed to have autism (n = 288), autism spectrum disorder (n = 141), or typical development (n = 278) at the University of California-Davis Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Institute using standardized clinical assessments. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for associations between autism and retrospectively collected data on maternal vitamin intake before and during pregnancy. We explored interaction effects with functional genetic variants involved in one-carbon metabolism (MTHFR, COMT, MTRR, BHMT, FOLR2, CBS, and TCN2) as carried by the mother or child. RESULTS: Mothers of children with autism were less likely than those of typically developing children to report having taken prenatal vitamins during the 3 months before pregnancy or the first month of pregnancy (OR = 0.62 [95% confidence interval = 0.42-0.93]). Significant interaction effects were observed for maternal MTHFR 677 TT, CBS rs234715 GT + TT, and child COMT 472 AA genotypes, with greater risk for autism when mothers did not report taking prenatal vitamins periconceptionally (4.5 [1.4-14.6]; 2.6 [1.2-5.4]; and 7.2 [2.3-22.4], respectively). Greater risk was also observed for children whose mothers had other one-carbon metabolism pathway gene variants and reported no prenatal vitamin intake. CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional use of prenatal vitamins may reduce the risk of having children with autism, especially for genetically susceptible mothers and children. Replication and mechanistic investigations are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Causes of autism are unknown. Associations with maternal nutritional factors and their interactions with gene variants have not been reported. METHODS: Northern California families were enrolled from 2003 to 2009 in the CHARGE (CHildhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment) population-based case-control study. Children aged 24-60 months were evaluated and confirmed to have autism (n = 288), autism spectrum disorder (n = 141), or typical development (n = 278) at the University of California-Davis Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Institute using standardized clinical assessments. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for associations between autism and retrospectively collected data on maternal vitamin intake before and during pregnancy. We explored interaction effects with functional genetic variants involved in one-carbon metabolism (MTHFR, COMT, MTRR, BHMT, FOLR2, CBS, and TCN2) as carried by the mother or child. RESULTS: Mothers of children with autism were less likely than those of typically developing children to report having taken prenatal vitamins during the 3 months before pregnancy or the first month of pregnancy (OR = 0.62 [95% confidence interval = 0.42-0.93]). Significant interaction effects were observed for maternal MTHFR 677 TT, CBSrs234715 GT + TT, and childCOMT 472 AA genotypes, with greater risk for autism when mothers did not report taking prenatal vitamins periconceptionally (4.5 [1.4-14.6]; 2.6 [1.2-5.4]; and 7.2 [2.3-22.4], respectively). Greater risk was also observed for children whose mothers had other one-carbon metabolism pathway gene variants and reported no prenatal vitamin intake. CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional use of prenatal vitamins may reduce the risk of having children with autism, especially for genetically susceptible mothers and children. Replication and mechanistic investigations are warranted.
Authors: Anne M Molloy; James L Mills; Joseph McPartlin; Peadar N Kirke; John M Scott; Sean Daly Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: M F Egan; T E Goldberg; B S Kolachana; J H Callicott; C M Mazzanti; R E Straub; D Goldman; D R Weinberger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C T Correia; A M Coutinho; A F Sequeira; I G Sousa; L Lourenço Venda; J P Almeida; R L Abreu; C Lobo; T S Miguel; J Conroy; L Cochrane; L Gallagher; M Gill; S Ennis; G G Oliveira; A M Vicente Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Robyn Honea; Beth A Verchinski; Lukas Pezawas; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Joseph H Callicott; Venkata S Mattay; Daniel R Weinberger; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Abee L Boyles; Ashley V Billups; Kristen L Deak; Deborah G Siegel; Lorraine Mehltretter; Susan H Slifer; Alexander G Bassuk; John A Kessler; Michael C Reed; H Frederik Nijhout; Timothy M George; David S Enterline; John R Gilbert; Marcy C Speer Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Régine P Steegers-Theunissen; Sylvia A Obermann-Borst; Dennis Kremer; Jan Lindemans; Cissy Siebel; Eric A Steegers; P Eline Slagboom; Bastiaan T Heijmans Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura R Schaevitz; Jonathan D Picker; Jasmine Rana; Nancy H Kolodny; Barry Shane; Joanne E Berger-Sweeney; Joseph T Coyle Journal: Dev Neurobiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.964
Authors: Hyeong-Moo Shin; Deborah H Bennett; Antonia M Calafat; Daniel Tancredi; Irva Hertz-Picciotto Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 6.498