Literature DB >> 21610225

Difference of tissue characteristics between early and very late restenosis lesions after bare-metal stent implantation: an optical coherence tomography study.

Maoto Habara1, Mitsuyasu Terashima, Kenya Nasu, Hideaki Kaneda, Katsumi Inoue, Tsuyoshi Ito, Shigeru Kamikawa, Tairo Kurita, Nobuyoshi Tanaka, Masashi Kimura, Yoshihisa Kinoshita, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Hitoshi Matsuo, Katsumi Ueno, Osamu Katoh, Takahiko Suzuki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although in-stent restenosis (ISR) after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation peaks in the early phase, very late (VL) ISR occasionally is observed beyond a few years after BMS implantation. To date, this mechanism has not been fully clarified. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We compared the morphological characteristics of VL-ISR (>5 years, without restenosis within the first year) (n=43) to those of early (E) ISR (within the first year) (n=39) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Qualitative restenotic tissue analysis included assessment of tissue structure (homogeneous or heterogeneous), presence of microvessels, disrupted intima with cavity, and intraluminal material and was performed at every 1-mm slice of the entire stent. The proportions of cross-sections with heterogeneous intima in the entire stent was significantly higher in the VL-ISR group compared to the E-ISR group (60.5±28.5% versus 5.8±11.5%, P<0.0001), with heterogeneous intima being more frequently observed at the minimum lumen area site in the VL-ISR group (90.7% versus 17.9%, P<0.0001). Disrupted intima with cavity and intraluminal material also were observed more frequently in the VL-ISR group for the entire stent (18.6% versus 0%, 20.9% versus 2.6%, P<0.03) as well as at the minimum lumen area site (13.9% versus 0%,16.2% versus 0%, P<0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The morphological characteristics of restenotic tissue in VL-ISR were different from those in E-ISR and similar to atherosclerotic plaque. In BMS, progression of the atherosclerotic process within neointima after stent implantation may be associated with VL-ISR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21610225     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.959999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  20 in total

1.  Mechanism of in-stent restenosis after second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES): is it different from bare-metal stents and first-generation DES?

Authors:  Shoichi Kuramitsu; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Use of intravascular ultrasound vs. optical coherence tomography for mechanism and patterns of in-stent restenosis among bare metal stents and drug eluting stents.

Authors:  Muzina Akhtar; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Ruptured plaque in a bare-metal stent 8 years after implantation-Comparison of IVUS and OCT findings.

Authors:  Shigenori Ito; Kosuke Nakasuka; Kazuyuki Miyata; Masahiko Inomata; Takayuki Yoshida; Nozomu Tamai; Shin Suzuki; Yoshimasa Murakami; Koichi Sato
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-10-02

4.  Long-term changes in neointimal hyperplasia following implantation of bare metal stents assessed by integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Shinichiro Tanaka; Toshiyuki Noda; Makoto Iwama; Shintaro Tanihata; Masanori Kawasaki; Kazuhiko Nishigaki; Taro Minagawa; Sachiro Watanabe; Shinya Minatoguchi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Choice of Intracoronary Imaging: When to use Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Sudheer Koganti; Tushar Kotecha; Roby D Rakhit
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

6.  In-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predicts neointimal hyperplasia after two years.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamashita; Jouji Kokuzawa; Tatsuya Kuroda; Satoru Murase; Morio Kumagai; Yasuhiko Kaku
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-08-17

7.  Qualitative and quantitative neointimal characterization by optical coherence tomography in patients presenting with in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Erion Xhepa; Robert A Byrne; Fernando Rivero; Andi Rroku; Javier Cuesta; Gjin Ndrepepa; Sebastian Kufner; Teresa Bastante Valiente; Salvatore Cassese; Marcos Garcia-Guimaraes; Anna Lena Lahmann; Himanshu Rai; Heribert Schunkert; Michael Joner; María José Pérez-Vizcayno; Nieves Gonzalo; Fernando Alfonso; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  The role of optical coherence tomography in coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hideaki Kaneda; Takahiko Suzuki
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  A case of in-stent neoatherosclerosis 10 years after carotid artery stent implantation: observation with optical coherence tomography and plaque histological findings.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsumoto; Rie Yako; Osamu Masuo; Katsuhisa Hirayama; Yuji Uematsu; Naoyuki Nakao
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Stent evaluation with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Seung-Yul Lee; Myeong-Ki Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.