Literature DB >> 21609423

Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Masaki Ishida1, Andreas Schuster, Geraint Morton, Amedeo Chiribiri, Shazia Hussain, Matthias Paul, Nico Merkle, Henning Steen, Dirk Lossnitzer, Bernhard Schnackenburg, Khaled Alfakih, Sven Plein, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dual-bolus protocol enables accurate quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) by first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). However, despite the advantages and increasing demand for the dual-bolus method for accurate quantification of MBF, thus far, it has not been widely used in the field of quantitative perfusion CMR. The main reasons for this are that the setup for the dual-bolus method is complex and requires a state-of-the-art injector and there is also a lack of post processing software. As a solution to one of these problems, we have devised a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for use in a clinical setting. The purpose of this study is to show the setup and feasibility of the universal dual-bolus injection scheme.
METHODS: The universal dual-bolus injection scheme was tested using multiple combinations of different contrast agents, contrast agent dose, power injectors, perfusion sequences, and CMR scanners. This included 3 different contrast agents (Gd-DO3A-butrol, Gd-DTPA and Gd-DOTA), 4 different doses (0.025 mmol/kg, 0.05 mmol/kg, 0.075 mmol/kg and 0.1 mmol/kg), 2 different types of injectors (with and without "pause" function), 5 different sequences (turbo field echo (TFE), balanced TFE, k-space and time (k-t) accelerated TFE, k-t accelerated balanced TFE, turbo fast low-angle shot) and 3 different CMR scanners from 2 different manufacturers. The relation between the time width of dilute contrast agent bolus curve and cardiac output was obtained to determine the optimal predefined pause duration between dilute and neat contrast agent injection.
RESULTS: 161 dual-bolus perfusion scans were performed. Three non-injector-related technical errors were observed (1.9%). No injector-related errors were observed. The dual-bolus scheme worked well in all the combinations of parameters if the optimal predefined pause was used. Linear regression analysis showed that the optimal duration for the predefined pause is 25s to separate the dilute and neat contrast agent bolus curves if 0.1 mmol/kg dose of Gd-DO3A-butrol is used.
CONCLUSION: The universal dual-bolus injection scheme does not require sophisticated double-head power injector function and is a feasible technique to obtain reasonable arterial input function curves for absolute MBF quantification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21609423      PMCID: PMC3118114          DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  15 in total

1.  Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; Cory Swingen; Ravi Teja Seethamraju
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion under adenosine stress.

Authors:  Christian Ritter; Anita Brackertz; Jörn Sandstede; Meinrad Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans.

Authors:  Li-Yueh Hsu; Kenneth L Rhoads; Jessica E Holly; Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Absolute blood contrast concentration and blood signal saturation on myocardial perfusion MRI: estimation from CT data.

Authors:  Masaki Ishida; Hajime Sakuma; Shuichi Murashima; Junko Nishida; Masayo Senga; Shigeki Kobayasi; Kan Takeda; Noriyuki Kato
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative analysis of first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI using a Patlak plot method and blood saturation correction.

Authors:  Takashi Ichihara; Masaki Ishida; Kakuya Kitagawa; Yasutaka Ichikawa; Takahiro Natsume; Noriyasu Yamaki; Hisato Maeda; Kan Takeda; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function by cine-MR imaging depending on the investigator's experience.

Authors:  A Bailly; J Lipiecki; P Chabrot; A Alfidja; J M Garcier; S Ughetto; J Ponsonnaille; L Boyer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Single- or dual-bolus approach for the assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve in quantitative MR perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Wolfgang Utz; Andreas Greiser; Thoralf Niendorf; Rainer Dietz; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Assessment of advanced coronary artery disease: advantages of quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Patrick F Antkowiak; Kiran R Nandalur; Amy M West; Michael Salerno; Vishal Arora; John Christopher; Frederick H Epstein; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  An isolated perfused pig heart model for the development, validation and translation of novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  Andreas Schuster; Inga Grünwald; Amedeo Chiribiri; Richard Southworth; Masaki Ishida; Gunnar Hay; Nicole Neumann; Geraint Morton; Divaka Perera; Tobias Schaeffter; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Regadenoson: a new myocardial stress agent.

Authors:  Wael Al Jaroudi; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  59 in total

1.  Variability in quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis.

Authors:  K Bratis; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance derived myocardial perfusion measurements using advanced techniques: microsphere validation in an explanted pig heart system.

Authors:  Andreas Schuster; Niloufar Zarinabad; Masaki Ishida; Matthew Sinclair; Jeroen Phm van den Wijngaard; Geraint Morton; Gilion Ltf Hautvast; Boris Bigalke; Pepijn van Horssen; Nicolas Smith; Jos Ae Spaan; Maria Siebes; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  A quantitative high resolution voxel-wise assessment of myocardial blood flow from contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in a magnetic resonance compatible free beating explanted pig heart model.

Authors:  Andreas Schuster; Matthew Sinclair; Niloufar Zarinabad; Masaki Ishida; Jeroen P H M van den Wijngaard; Matthias Paul; Pepijn van Horssen; Shazia T Hussain; Divaka Perera; Tobias Schaeffter; Jos A E Spaan; Maria Siebes; Eike Nagel; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Robust Non-Rigid Motion Compensation of Free-Breathing Myocardial Perfusion MRI Data.

Authors:  Cian M Scannell; Adriana D M Villa; Jack Lee; Marcel Breeuwer; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Cardiac MR perfusion imaging: where we are.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Luigi Natale; Amedeo Chiribiri; Federica Pirro; Valentina Silvestri; Giuseppe Coppola; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  An empirical method for reducing variability and complexity of myocardial perfusion quantification by dual bolus cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Neil Chatterjee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Jacob U Fluckiger; Timothy Carroll; Daniel C Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Comparison of an advanced, high-resolution and a standard sequence.

Authors:  Geraint Morton; Masaki Ishida; Andreas Schuster; Shazia Hussain; Tobias Schaeffter; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Alfonso H Waller; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow using non-electrocardiogram-triggered MRI with three-slice coverage.

Authors:  David Chen; Behzad Sharif; Xiaoming Bi; Janet Wei; Louise E J Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Optimization of saturation-recovery dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI acquisition protocol: monte carlo simulation approach demonstrated with gadolinium MR renography.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Chris C Conlin; Kristi Carlston; Luke Xie; Daniel Kim; Glen Morrell; Kathryn Morton; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.