Literature DB >> 21606744

Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasonography: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.

Katherine R Goetzinger1, Alison G Cahill, George A Macones, Anthony O Odibo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate if echogenic bowel diagnosed on second-trimester ultrasonography has an independent risk association with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and intrauterine fetal demise.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients with singleton gestations who presented to our institution for second-trimester ultrasonography between 1990 and 2008. Study groups were defined by the presence or absence of echogenic bowel. Primary outcomes were IUGR, defined as birth weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age and intrauterine fetal demise at 20 weeks or more of gestation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of intrauterine fetal demise and IUGR in fetuses with echogenic bowel. Analyses were repeated after excluding cases of aneuploidy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, other major congenital anomalies, and abnormal second-trimester serum screening results.
RESULTS: Of 64,048 patients, the incidence of echogenic bowel was 0.4%. Of these, echogenic bowel was an isolated finding in 188 (72.3%) cases. There were 579 (0.9%) cases of intrauterine fetal demise and 8,173 (12.8%) cases of IUGR in the entire cohort. After excluding cases of aneuploidy and CMV infection, the incidence of intrauterine fetal demise was 7.3% in the echogenic bowel group compared with 0.9% in the nonechogenic bowel group, translating to an absolute risk increase of 6.4%. The incidence of IUGR in the echogenic bowel group was 19.5% compared with 12.9% in the nonechogenic bowel group (absolute risk increase, 6.6%). After controlling for potential confounders, echogenic bowel was significantly associated with both intrauterine fetal demise (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-15.9) and IUGR (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9). This risk association remained significant even when evaluating echogenic bowel as an isolated sonographic finding.
CONCLUSION: The presence of echogenic bowel on ultrasonography is independently associated with an increased risk for both IUGR and intrauterine fetal demise. Serial growth assessment and antenatal testing may be warranted in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21606744      PMCID: PMC3110147          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821aa739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  Factors associated with fetal demise in fetal echogenic bowel.

Authors:  H B Al-Kouatly; S T Chasen; A K Karam; R Ahner; F A Chervenak
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Focus on cystic fibrosis and other disorders evidenced in fetuses with sonographic finding of echogenic bowel: 16-year report from Brittany, France.

Authors:  Virginie Scotet; Ingrid Duguépéroux; Marie-Pierre Audrézet; Séverine Audebert-Bellanger; Matthieu Muller; Martine Blayau; Claude Férec
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Antenatal fetal surveillance in pregnancies complicated by fetal gastroschisis.

Authors:  Craig V Towers; Margaret H Carr
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The role of antepartum surveillance in the management of gastroschisis.

Authors:  C D Adair; J Rosnes; A H Frye; D R Burrus; L H Nelson; J C Veille
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Echogenic fetal bowel during the second trimester: clinical importance.

Authors:  D A Nyberg; T Dubinsky; R G Resta; B S Mahony; D E Hickok; D A Luthy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Echogenic bowel in intrauterine growth restriction fetuses: does this jeopardize the gut?

Authors:  Reuwen Achiron; Rami Mazkereth; Raoul Orvieto; Jacob Kuint; Shlomo Lipitz; Zeev Rotstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Fetal echogenic gut: a marker of intrauterine gut ischaemia?

Authors:  A K Ewer; J M McHugo; S Chapman; S J Newell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  A comparative study of microvillar enzyme activities in the prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  D J Brock
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Second-trimester echogenic bowel and intraamniotic bleeding: association between fetal bowel echogenicity and amniotic fluid spectrophotometry at 410 nm.

Authors:  W Sepulveda; R Reid; P Nicolaidis; O Prendiville; R S Chapman; N M Fisk
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Isolated hyperechoic fetal bowel: significance and implications for management.

Authors:  S N MacGregor; R Tamura; R Sabbagha; J K Brenhofer; M P Kambich; E Pergament
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prognosis of 591 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers during mid-term pregnancy.

Authors:  Jin-Wen Lu; Li Lin; Li-Ping Xiao; Ping Li; Yin Shen; Xiao-Li Zhang; Ming Zhang; Ming-Xia Yu; Yuan-Zhen Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

2.  Prevalence of defined ultrasound findings of unknown significance at the second trimester fetal anomaly scan and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: the Welsh study of mothers and babies population-based cohort.

Authors:  Lisa Hurt; Melissa Wright; Frank Dunstan; Susan Thomas; Fiona Brook; Susan Morris; David Tucker; Marilyn Ann Wills; Colin Davies; Gareth John; David Fone; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Pathophysiology of Hyperechogenic Bowel in Congenitally Human Cytomegalovirus Infected Fetuses.

Authors:  Liliana Gabrielli; Maria P Bonasoni; Angela Chiereghin; Giulia Piccirilli; Eva C Borgatti; Giuliana Simonazzi; Nunzio C M Salfi; Ione Tamagnini; Tiziana Lazzarotto
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-22

4.  Clinical significance of soft markers in second trimester ultrasonography for pregnant Korean women: a multicenter study and literature review.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Ko; Dong Wook Kwak; Soo-Young Oh; Sae Kyung Choi; Joon Seok Hong; Han Sung Hwang; Hyun Soo Park; Hyun-Joo Seol; Moon Young Kim; Sa Jin Kim; Joong Shin Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  The Welsh study of mothers and babies: protocol for a population-based cohort study to investigate the clinical significance of defined ultrasound findings of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Lisa Hurt; Melissa Wright; Fiona Brook; Susan Thomas; Frank Dunstan; David Fone; Gareth John; Sue Morris; David Tucker; Marilyn Ann Wills; Lyn Chitty; Colin Davies; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.