OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the capability of a Cool-tip electrode to create larger coagulation volumes combined with a low-flow (0.1 mL/min) perfusion of hypertonic saline at a distance of 2 mm (hybrid applicator) without reducing either predictability or sphericity of the coagulation zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 radiofrequency ablations were performed on a total of 12 adult pigs: 24 with the Cool-tip (group 1) and 24 with the hybrid applicator (group 2). Volumes and diameters were assessed both macroscopically and with imaging techniques (ultrasound and MRI). Digital reconstruction techniques were also used. Reproducibility of the coagulations was assessed by means of the coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The macroscopic assessment showed a significantly larger coagulation zone in group 2 than in group 1, both with (19.40 ± 11.38 cm(3) vs 9.16 ± 5.62 cm(3); p < 0.001) and without (19.54 ± 11.39 cm(3) vs 9.21 ± 5.74 cm(3); p < 0.001) digital reconstruction. Differences were also significant in the MRI assessment. The minimum transverse diameter was also significantly (p < 0.01) larger in group 2 than group 1: 2.46 ± 0.61 versus 1.86 ± 0.55 cm for macroscopic assessment, 2.33 ± 0.96 versus 1.69 ± 0.53 cm for ultrasound, and 2.41 ± 0.58 versus 1.8 ± 0.52 cm for MRI. The coefficient of variation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that low-flow perfusion of hypertonic saline at 2 mm from a Cool-tip electrode could increase coagulation zone volume without reducing predictability.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the capability of a Cool-tip electrode to create larger coagulation volumes combined with a low-flow (0.1 mL/min) perfusion of hypertonicsaline at a distance of 2 mm (hybrid applicator) without reducing either predictability or sphericity of the coagulation zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 48 radiofrequency ablations were performed on a total of 12 adult pigs: 24 with the Cool-tip (group 1) and 24 with the hybrid applicator (group 2). Volumes and diameters were assessed both macroscopically and with imaging techniques (ultrasound and MRI). Digital reconstruction techniques were also used. Reproducibility of the coagulations was assessed by means of the coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The macroscopic assessment showed a significantly larger coagulation zone in group 2 than in group 1, both with (19.40 ± 11.38 cm(3) vs 9.16 ± 5.62 cm(3); p < 0.001) and without (19.54 ± 11.39 cm(3) vs 9.21 ± 5.74 cm(3); p < 0.001) digital reconstruction. Differences were also significant in the MRI assessment. The minimum transverse diameter was also significantly (p < 0.01) larger in group 2 than group 1: 2.46 ± 0.61 versus 1.86 ± 0.55 cm for macroscopic assessment, 2.33 ± 0.96 versus 1.69 ± 0.53 cm for ultrasound, and 2.41 ± 0.58 versus 1.8 ± 0.52 cm for MRI. The coefficient of variation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that low-flow perfusion of hypertonicsaline at 2 mm from a Cool-tip electrode could increase coagulation zone volume without reducing predictability.
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Aleksandar Radosevic; Rita Quesada; Clara Serlavos; Juan Sánchez; Ander Zugazaga; Ana Sierra; Susana Coll; Marcos Busto; Guadalupe Aguilar; Daniel Flores; Javier Arce; José María Maiques; Montserrat Garcia-Retortillo; José Antonio Carrion; Laura Visa; María Villamonte; Eva Pueyo; Enrique Berjano; Macarena Trujillo; Patricia Sánchez-Velázquez; Luís Grande; Fernando Burdio Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.379