Literature DB >> 21605923

Antibacterial activity of chemically defined chitosans: influence of molecular weight, degree of acetylation and test organism.

H Mellegård1, S P Strand, B E Christensen, P E Granum, S P Hardy.   

Abstract

Chitosans, polysaccharides obtained from the exoskeleton of crustaceans, have been shown to exert antibacterial activity in vitro and their use as a food preservative is of growing interest. However, beyond a consensus that chitosan appears to disrupt the bacterial cell membrane, published data are inconsistent on the chemical characteristics that confer the antibacterial activity of chitosan. While most authors agree that the net charge density of the polymer (reflected in the fraction of positively charged amino groups at the C-2 position of the glucosamine unit) is an important factor in antibacterial activity, conflicting data have been reported on the effect of molecular weight and on the susceptibility among different bacterial species to chitosan. Therefore, we prepared batches of water-soluble hydrochloride salts of chitosans with weight average molecular weights (M(w)) of 2-224kDa and degree of acetylation of 0.16 and 0.48. Their antibacterial activity was evaluated using tube inhibition assays and membrane integrity assays (N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine fluorescence and potassium release) against Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and three lipopolysaccharide mutants of E. coli and S. Typhimurium. Chitosans with lower degree of acetylation (F(A)=0.16) were more active than the more acetylated chitosans (F(A)=0.48). No trends in antibacterial action related to increasing or decreasing M(w) were observed although one of the chitosans (M(w) 28.4kDa, F(A)=0.16) was more active than the other chitosans, inhibiting growth and permeabilizing the membrane of all the test strains included. The test strains varied in their susceptibility to the different chitosans with wild type S. Typhimurium more resistant than the wild type E. coli. Salmonellae lipopolysaccharide mutants were more susceptible than the matched wild type strain. Our results show that the chitosan preparation details are critically important in identifying the antibacterial features that target different test organisms.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21605923     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  18 in total

1.  Genotypical Relationship Between Human and Poultry Strains of Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Roberta Torres de Melo; Carolyne Ferreira Dumont; Raquelline Figueiredo Braz; Guilherme Paz Monteiro; Micaela Guidotti Takeuchi; Eduarda Cristina Alves Lourenzatto; Jandra Pacheco Dos Santos; Daise Aparecida Rossi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Effect of enzymatic degradation of chitosan in polyhydroxybutyrate/chitosan/calcium phosphate composites on in vitro osteoblast response.

Authors:  Maria Giretova; Lubomir Medvecky; Radoslava Stulajterova; Tibor Sopcak; Jaroslav Briancin; Monika Tatarkova
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Application of chitosan-based nanoparticles in skin wound healing.

Authors:  Hooi Leong Loo; Bey Hing Goh; Learn-Han Lee; Lay Hong Chuah
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 9.273

4.  Bioprocessing of shrimp wastes to obtain chitosan and its antimicrobial potential in the context of ethanolic fermentation against bacterial contamination.

Authors:  Isabella C Tanganini; Ligianne D Shirahigue; Mariana Altenhofen da Silva; Kelly R Francisco; Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Identification of yeast genes that confer resistance to chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) using chemogenomics.

Authors:  Maria D L A Jaime; Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca; Ana Conesa; Anna Y Lee; Michael Proctor; Lawrence E Heisler; Marinella Gebbia; Guri Giaever; J Timothy Westwood; Corey Nislow
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Transcriptional responses of Bacillus cereus towards challenges with the polysaccharide chitosan.

Authors:  Hilde Mellegård; Ákos T Kovács; Toril Lindbäck; Bjørn E Christensen; Oscar P Kuipers; Per E Granum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Antimicrobial activity of chitosan derivatives containing N-quaternized moieties in its backbone: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro F Martins; Suelen P Facchi; Heveline D M Follmann; Antonio G B Pereira; Adley F Rubira; Edvani C Muniz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Antimicrobial action of oleanolic acid on Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Sejeong Kim; Heeyoung Lee; Soomin Lee; Yohan Yoon; Kyoung-Hee Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Molecular engineering of antimicrobial peptide (AMP)-polymer conjugates.

Authors:  Zixian Cui; Qinmo Luo; Mark S Bannon; Vincent P Gray; Taylor G Bloom; Madeline F Clore; Molly A Hughes; Matthew A Crawford; Rachel A Letteri
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 7.590

10.  The effect of substituent, degree of acetylation and positioning of the cationic charge on the antibacterial activity of quaternary chitosan derivatives.

Authors:  Priyanka Sahariah; Vivek S Gaware; Ramona Lieder; Sigríður Jónsdóttir; Martha Á Hjálmarsdóttir; Olafur E Sigurjonsson; Már Másson
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.