Literature DB >> 21603957

Sponge swabs increase sensitivity of sterility testing of processed bone and tendon allografts.

Huynh Nguyen1, David A F Morgan, Sharon Cull, Morris Benkovich, Mark R Forwood.   

Abstract

Sterility testing is the final, and critical, step in quality control of tissue banking. It informs the decision whether to release the tissue allografts for clinical use, or not. The most common method for sterility testing of structural bone and tendon allografts is to swab using cotton tip streaks. This method provides low recovery efficiency; and therefore may pass allografts with low bioburden, providing false negatives. Our pilot data revealed organism recovery efficiencies of 60, 30 and 100% from cotton swab, membrane filtration and sponge swaps, respectively. Our aim was to develop a high sensitivity sterility test for structural bone and tendon allografts using a sponge sampling method. Eighty-one bone and tendon allograft samples were inoculated with organism suspensions (10(2) or less organisms per 0.1 mL) of Clostridium sporogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Bacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp. Nasco sponges (4 × 8 cm) were used to aseptically sample the whole surface of allograft samples. The sponges were cut in half and cultured in either tryptone soya or fluid thioglycollate broths for 14 days. Positive culture samples were further examined for microbial morphology. The results showed that the sensitivity of the method, and negative predictive value, is 100% for all inoculated organisms incubated with thioglycollate. We conclude that this sponge sampling method should be applied as the standard for sterility testing of structural bone and tendon allografts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21603957     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-011-0982-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  23 in total

1.  Microbiological screening of post-mortem bone donors - two case reports.

Authors:  S B Vehmeyer; R M Bloem; P L Petit
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors.

Authors:  Stephan B W Vehmeyer; Arnoud R M Slooff; Rolf M Bloem; Pieter L C Petit
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-04

3.  Validation of 11 kGy as a radiation sterilization dose for frozen bone allografts.

Authors:  Huynh Nguyen; David A F Morgan; Mark R Forwood
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.

Authors:  Brian Byrne; Gemma Dunne; James Lyng; Declan J Bolton
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Cadaveric allograft microbiology.

Authors:  T Ibrahim; H Stafford; C N A Esler; R A Power
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparison of microbiological culture methods in screening allograft tissue. Swab versus nutrient broth.

Authors:  Veroniek S M Saegeman; Daniel Lismont; Bert Verduyckt; Nadine L Ectors; Jan Verhaegen
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Invasive group-A streptococcal infection in an allograft recipient. A case report.

Authors:  Ellen H Lee; Dayna Ferguson; Daniel Jernigan; Melissa Greenwald; Timothy Coté; Jon E Bos; Jeannette Guarner; Sherif Zaki; Anne Schuchat; Bernard Beall; Arjun Srinivasan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A comparison of two microbial detection methods used in aseptic processing of musculoskeletal allograft tissues.

Authors:  Jeremy A Dennis; Octavio V Martinez; David C Landy; Theodore I Malinin; Paul R Morris; William P Fox; Billy E Buck; H Thomas Temple
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.522

9.  Nationwide microbiological baseline data collected by sponge sampling during 1997 and 1998 for cattle, swine, turkeys, and geese.

Authors:  D R Eblen; P Levine; B E Rose; P Saini; R Mageau; W E Hill
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.

Authors:  Bernardo Martínez; M Felicidad Celda; Begoña Anastasio; Inés García; M Carmen López-Mendoza
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.077

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sponge Whirl-Pak Sampling Method and Droplet Digital RT-PCR Assay for Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 on Surfaces in Public and Working Environments.

Authors:  Davide Cardinale; Maria Tafuro; Andrea Mancusi; Santa Girardi; Federico Capuano; Yolande Thérèse Rose Proroga; Federica Corrado; Jacopo Luigi D'Auria; Annachiara Coppola; Giuseppe Rofrano; Palmiero Volzone; Pio Galdi; Sabato De Vita; Alfonso Gallo; Elisabetta Suffredini; Biancamaria Pierri; Pellegrino Cerino; Maria Morgante
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.