BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptom-based diagnosis for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been accepted in the population with high prevalence. Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) is a standardized symptom-based diagnosis tool for GERD. The value of this tool in the population with low prevalence is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine CDQ performance for diagnosis of GERD in Thai population with low prevalence versus endoscopy or 24 hour pH monitoring. METHODS: Patients with dyspepsia by Rome II criteria were recruited. All patients completed a Thai version of CDQ and underwent endoscopic examination. Those without esophagitis or peptic ulcer and positive CDQ score took pH monitoring. RESULTS: One hundred patients (68 female) with mean age ± SD of 45.6 ± 12.4 years were recruited. Six with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis had negative CDQ score. In 44 with positive CDQ score, 3 had Los Angeles grade B esophagitis and 41 had pH monitoring done with 8 having positive test. The GERD diagnosis by CDQ was confirmed in 11 of 44 patients (25%). CDQ detected 11 out of 17 GERD detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring and the sensitivity of CDQ was 64%. CONCLUSIONS: CDQ diagnosed more GERD in Thai population with low prevalence compared with endoscopy and pH monitoring. This may be due to some patients with functional heartburn were picked up by CDQ and some patients with GERD were not detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Symptom-based diagnosis for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been accepted in the population with high prevalence. Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ) is a standardized symptom-based diagnosis tool for GERD. The value of this tool in the population with low prevalence is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine CDQ performance for diagnosis of GERD in Thai population with low prevalence versus endoscopy or 24 hour pH monitoring. METHODS:Patients with dyspepsia by Rome II criteria were recruited. All patients completed a Thai version of CDQ and underwent endoscopic examination. Those without esophagitis or peptic ulcer and positive CDQ score took pH monitoring. RESULTS: One hundred patients (68 female) with mean age ± SD of 45.6 ± 12.4 years were recruited. Six with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis had negative CDQ score. In 44 with positive CDQ score, 3 had Los Angeles grade B esophagitis and 41 had pH monitoring done with 8 having positive test. The GERD diagnosis by CDQ was confirmed in 11 of 44 patients (25%). CDQ detected 11 out of 17 GERD detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring and the sensitivity of CDQ was 64%. CONCLUSIONS:CDQ diagnosed more GERD in Thai population with low prevalence compared with endoscopy and pH monitoring. This may be due to some patients with functional heartburn were picked up by CDQ and some patients with GERD were not detected by endoscopy and pH monitoring.
Authors: L R Lundell; J Dent; J R Bennett; A L Blum; D Armstrong; J P Galmiche; F Johnson; M Hongo; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin Journal: Gut Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: R Carlsson; J Dent; E Bolling-Sternevald; F Johnsson; O Junghard; K Lauritsen; S Riley; L Lundell Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: W M Wong; K F Lam; K C Lai; W M Hui; W H C Hu; C L K Lam; N Y H Wong; H H X Xia; J Q Huang; A O O Chan; S K Lam; B C Y Wong Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Juan Carlos Lopez-Alvarenga; Sergio Sobrino-Cossio; Ronnie Fass; Jose A Vargas-Romero Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 4.924