RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our prototype method for segmentation and tracking of the coronary arterial tree, which is the foundation for a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to be developed to assist radiologists in detecting non-calcified plaques in coronary CT angiography (cCTA) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The heart region was first extracted by a morphological operation and an adaptive thresholding method based on expectation-maximization (EM) estimation. The vascular structures within the heart region were enhanced and segmented using a multiscale coronary response (MSCAR) method that combined 3D multiscale filtering, analysis of the eigenvalues of Hessian matrices and EM estimation segmentation. After the segmentation of vascular structures, the coronary arteries were tracked by a 3D dynamic balloon tracking (DBT) method. The DBT method started at two manually identified seed points located at the origins of the left and right coronary arteries (LCA and RCA) for extraction of the arterial trees. The coronary arterial trees of a data set containing 20 ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cCTA scans were extracted by our MSCAR-DBT method and a clinical GE Advantage workstation. Two experienced thoracic radiologists visually examined the coronary arteries on the original cCTA scans and the rendered volume of segmented vessels to count the untracked false-negative (FN) segments and false positives (FPs) for both methods. RESULTS: For the visible coronary arterial segments in the 20 cases, the radiologists identified that 25 segments were missed by our MSCAR-DBT method, ranging from 0 to 5 FN segments in individual cases, and that 55 artery segments were missed by the GE software, ranging from 0 to 7 FN segments in individual cases. 19 and 15 FPs were identified in our and the GE coronary trees, ranging from 0 to 4 FPs for both methods in individual cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility of our MSCAR-DBT method for segmentation and tracking coronary artery trees. The results indicated that both our method and GE software can extract coronary artery trees reasonably well and the performance of our method is superior to that of GE software in this small data set. Further studies are underway to develop methods for improvement of the segmentation and tracking accuracy.
RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our prototype method for segmentation and tracking of the coronary arterial tree, which is the foundation for a computer-aided detection (CADe) system to be developed to assist radiologists in detecting non-calcified plaques in coronary CT angiography (cCTA) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The heart region was first extracted by a morphological operation and an adaptive thresholding method based on expectation-maximization (EM) estimation. The vascular structures within the heart region were enhanced and segmented using a multiscale coronary response (MSCAR) method that combined 3D multiscale filtering, analysis of the eigenvalues of Hessian matrices and EM estimation segmentation. After the segmentation of vascular structures, the coronary arteries were tracked by a 3D dynamic balloon tracking (DBT) method. The DBT method started at two manually identified seed points located at the origins of the left and right coronary arteries (LCA and RCA) for extraction of the arterial trees. The coronary arterial trees of a data set containing 20 ECG-gated contrast-enhanced cCTA scans were extracted by our MSCAR-DBT method and a clinical GE Advantage workstation. Two experienced thoracic radiologists visually examined the coronary arteries on the original cCTA scans and the rendered volume of segmented vessels to count the untracked false-negative (FN) segments and false positives (FPs) for both methods. RESULTS: For the visible coronary arterial segments in the 20 cases, the radiologists identified that 25 segments were missed by our MSCAR-DBT method, ranging from 0 to 5 FN segments in individual cases, and that 55 artery segments were missed by the GE software, ranging from 0 to 7 FN segments in individual cases. 19 and 15 FPs were identified in our and the GE coronary trees, ranging from 0 to 4 FPs for both methods in individual cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility of our MSCAR-DBT method for segmentation and tracking coronary artery trees. The results indicated that both our method and GE software can extract coronary artery trees reasonably well and the performance of our method is superior to that of GE software in this small data set. Further studies are underway to develop methods for improvement of the segmentation and tracking accuracy.
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Roger S Blumenthal; J Jeffrey Carr; Jonathan G Goldin; Philip Greenland; Alan D Guerci; Joao A C Lima; Daniel J Rader; Geoffrey D Rubin; Leslee J Shaw; Susan E Wiegers Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; David Dowe; James G Jollis; Michael Gitter; John Sutherland; Edward Halamert; Markus Scherer; Raye Bellinger; Arthur Martin; Robert Benton; Augustin Delago; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Aamer Chughtai; Jean Kuriakose; Prachi Agarwal; Ella A Kazerooni; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Smita Patel; Jun Wei Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Aamer Chughtai; Jun Wei; Ella A Kazerooni Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Wing Keung Cheung; Robert Bell; Arjun Nair; Leon J Menezes; Riyaz Patel; Simon Wan; Kacy Chou; Jiahang Chen; Ryo Torii; Rhodri H Davies; James C Moon; Daniel C Alexander; Joseph Jacob Journal: IEEE Access Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jordan Liu; Heang-Ping Chan; Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Aamer Chughtai; Jean Kuriakose; Prachi Agarwal; Ella Kazerooni Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 2.238