Literature DB >> 25086532

Computerized detection of noncalcified plaques in coronary CT angiography: evaluation of topological soft gradient prescreening method and luminal analysis.

Jun Wei1, Chuan Zhou1, Heang-Ping Chan1, Aamer Chughtai1, Prachi Agarwal1, Jean Kuriakose1, Lubomir Hadjiiski1, Smita Patel1, Ella Kazerooni1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The buildup of noncalcified plaques (NCPs) that are vulnerable to rupture in coronary arteries is a risk for myocardial infarction. Interpretation of coronary CT angiography (cCTA) to search for NCP is a challenging task for radiologists due to the low CT number of NCP, the large number of coronary arteries, and multiple phase CT acquisition. The authors conducted a preliminary study to develop machine learning method for automated detection of NCPs in cCTA.
METHODS: With IRB approval, a data set of 83 ECG-gated contrast enhanced cCTA scans with 120 NCPs was collected retrospectively from patient files. A multiscale coronary artery response and rolling balloon region growing (MSCAR-RBG) method was applied to each cCTA volume to extract the coronary arterial trees. Each extracted vessel was reformatted to a straightened volume composed of cCTA slices perpendicular to the vessel centerline. A topological soft-gradient (TSG) detection method was developed to prescreen for NCP candidates by analyzing the 2D topological features of the radial gradient field surface along the vessel wall. The NCP candidates were then characterized by a luminal analysis that used 3D geometric features to quantify the shape information and gray-level features to evaluate the density of the NCP candidates. With machine learning techniques, useful features were identified and combined into an NCP score to differentiate true NCPs from false positives (FPs). To evaluate the effectiveness of the image analysis methods, the authors performed tenfold cross-validation with the available data set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the classification performance of individual features and the NCP score. The overall detection performance was estimated by free response ROC (FROC) analysis.
RESULTS: With our TSG prescreening method, a prescreening sensitivity of 92.5% (111/120) was achieved with a total of 1181 FPs (14.2 FPs/scan). On average, six features were selected during the tenfold cross-validation training. The average area under the ROC curve (AUC) value for training was 0.87 ± 0.01 and the AUC value for validation was 0.85 ± 0.01. Using the NCP score, FROC analysis of the validation set showed that the FP rates were reduced to 3.16, 1.90, and 1.39 FPs/scan at sensitivities of 90%, 80%, and 70%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The topological soft-gradient prescreening method in combination with the luminal analysis for FP reduction was effective for detection of NCPs in cCTA, including NCPs causing positive or negative vessel remodeling. The accuracy of vessel segmentation, tracking, and centerline identification has a strong impact on NCP detection. Studies are underway to further improve these techniques and reduce the FPs of the CADe system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086532      PMCID: PMC4105962          DOI: 10.1118/1.4885958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; R F Wagner; L Hadjiiski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Coronary imaging: angiography shows the stenosis, but IVUS, CT, and MRI show the plaque.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Richard D White; Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Quantitative plaque characterization with coronary CT angiography (CTA): current challenges and future application in atherosclerosis trials and clinical risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Mitya Barreto; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; C Herdeg; C D Claussen; K R Karsch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Computerized analysis of coronary artery disease: performance evaluation of segmentation and tracking of coronary arteries in CT angiograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Aamer Chughtai; Jean Kuriakose; Prachi Agarwal; Ella A Kazerooni; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Smita Patel; Jun Wei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography.

Authors:  Stephanie Busch; Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Franz von Ziegler; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Johannes Rixe; Katharina Anders; Axel Küttner; Ulrich Baum; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.

Authors:  Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Sara L Jackson; Linn Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; Edward A Sickles; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.

Authors:  Haipeng Liu; Aleksandra Wingert; Jian'an Wang; Jucheng Zhang; Xinhong Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Fei Chen; Syed Ghufran Khalid; Jun Jiang; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

2.  Coronary artery analysis: Computer-assisted selection of best-quality segments in multiple-phase coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Aamer Chughtai; Jun Wei; Ella A Kazerooni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Machine learning applications in cardiac computed tomography: a composite systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan James Hyett Bray; Moghees Ahmad Hanif; Mohammad Alradhawi; Jacob Ibbetson; Surinder Singh Dosanjh; Sabrina Lucy Smith; Mahmood Ahmad; Dominic Pimenta
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Coronary atherosclerosis evaluation among Iranian patients with zero coronary calcium score in computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Maryam Moradi; Elham Varasteh
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-02-08

5.  Best-Quality Vessel Identification Using Vessel Quality Measure in Multiple-Phase Coronary CT Angiography.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jordan Liu; Heang-Ping Chan; Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Aamer Chughtai; Jean Kuriakose; Prachi Agarwal; Ella Kazerooni
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 6.  Machine Learning for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Cardiac CT: A Survey.

Authors:  Nils Hampe; Jelmer M Wolterink; Sanne G M van Velzen; Tim Leiner; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-26

7.  Automated Classification of Atherosclerotic Radiomics Features in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA).

Authors:  Mardhiyati Mohd Yunus; Ahmad Khairuddin Mohamed Yusof; Muhd Zaidi Ab Rahman; Xue Jing Koh; Akmal Sabarudin; Puteri N E Nohuddin; Kwan Hoong Ng; Mohd Mustafa Awang Kechik; Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Coronary computed tomography angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in the detection of significant coronary stenosis: how the plaque type influences the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Antonio Vizzuso; Riccardo Righi; Aldo Carnevale; Michela Zerbini; Giorgio Benea; Melchiore Giganti
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.