Literature DB >> 21601403

Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software.

Claude Kauffmann1, An Tang, Eric Therasse, Marie-France Giroux, Stephane Elkouri, Philippe Melanson, Bertrand Melanson, Vincent L Oliva, Gilles Soulez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the reproducibility and accuracy of a software dedicated to measure abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter, volume and growth over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A software enabling AAA segmentation, diameter and volume measurement on computed tomography angiography (CTA) was tested. Validation was conducted in 28 patients with an AAA having 2 consecutive CTA examinations. The segmentation was performed twice by a senior radiologist and once by 3 medical students on all 56 CTAs. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility of D-max and volumes values were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Systematic errors were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Differences in D-max and volume growth were compared with paired Student's t-tests.
RESULTS: Mean D-max and volume were 49.6±6.2mm and 117.2±36.2ml for baseline and 53.6±7.9mm and 139.6±56.3ml for follow-up studies. Volume growth (17.3%) was higher than D-max progression (8.0%) between baseline and follow-up examinations (p<.0001). For the senior radiologist, intra-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.997 (≥0.991) and 1.000 (≥0.999). Overall inter-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.995 (0.990-0.997) and 0.999 (>0.999). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent inter-reader agreement with a repeatability coefficient <3mm for D-max, <7% for relative D-max growth, <6ml for volume and <6% for relative volume growth.
CONCLUSION: Software AAA volume measurements were more sensitive than AAA D-max to detect AAA growth while providing an equivalent and high reproducibility.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21601403     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  16 in total

Review 1.  Advances in determining abdominal aortic aneurysm size and growth.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Stella Lioudaki; Dimitrios Pantidis; George Papadopoulos; Efstratios Georgakarakos; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

2.  Aortic Volumetry at Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Feasibility as a Sensitive Method for Monitoring Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

Authors:  Brian Trinh; Iram Dubin; Ozair Rahman; Marcos P Ferreira Botelho; Nicholas Naro; James C Carr; Jeremy D Collins; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Hemostatic Biomarkers and Volumetry Help to Identify High-Risk Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Sebastian Fernandez-Alonso; Esther Martinez-Aguilar; Susana Ravassa; Josune Orbe; Jose A Paramo; Leopoldo Fernandez-Alonso; Carmen Roncal
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Role of volume in small abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance.

Authors:  Sydney L Olson; Annalise M Panthofer; William Blackwelder; Michael L Terrin; John A Curci; B Timothy Baxter; Fred A Weaver; Jon S Matsumura
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Impact of contrast injection and stent-graft implantation on reproducibility of volume measurements in semiautomated segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysm on computed tomography.

Authors:  Florence Morin-Roy; Claude Kauffmann; An Tang; Sofiane Hadjadj; Olivier Thomas; Nicolas Piché; Stéphane Elkouri; Dan Yang Yang; Éric Therasse; Gilles Soulez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Maximum Diameter of Native Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Measured by Angio-Computed Tomography: Reproducibility and Lack of Consensus Impacts on Clinical Decisions.

Authors:  Caroline E Mora; Claude D Marcus; Coralie M Barbe; Fiona B Ecarnot; Anne L Long
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Vascular Deformation Mapping (VDM) of Thoracic Aortic Enlargement in Aneurysmal Disease and Dissection.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Benjamin A Hoff; Ella A Kazerooni; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2017-09

8.  Feasibility and accuracy of a novel automated three-dimensional ultrasonographic analysis system for abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasonography and computed tomography.

Authors:  In-Jeong Cho; Jinyong Lee; Jinki Park; Sang-Eun Lee; Chul-Min Ahn; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Hyuk-Jae Chang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  Predictive imaging for thoracic aortic dissection and rupture: moving beyond diameters.

Authors:  Bouke P Adriaans; Joachim E Wildberger; Jos J M Westenberg; Hildo J Lamb; Simon Schalla
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Vascular Deformation Mapping of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Drew J Braet; Jonathan Eliason; Yunus Ahmed; Pieter A J van Bakel; Jiayang Zhong; Zhangxing Bian; Carlos Alberto Figueroa; Nicholas S Burris
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.