Literature DB >> 21600843

Action of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on sensory, motor and autonomic function in human spinal cord injury.

A Kuppuswamy1, A V Balasubramaniam, R Maksimovic, C J Mathias, A Gall, M D Craggs, P H Ellaway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of physiological outcome measures in detecting functional change in the degree of impairment of spinal cord injury (SCI) following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the sensorimotor cortex.
METHODS: Subjects with complete or incomplete cervical (or T1) SCI received real and sham rTMS in a randomised placebo-controlled single-blinded cross-over trial. rTMS at sub-threshold intensity for upper-limb muscles was applied (5 Hz, 900 stimuli) on 5 consecutive days. Assessments made before and for 2 weeks after treatment comprised the ASIA (American Spinal Injuries Association) impairment scale (AIS), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), a peg-board test, electrical perceptual test (EPT), motor evoked potentials, cortical silent period, cardiovascular and sympathetic skin responses.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in AIS outcomes between real and sham rTMS. The ARAT was increased at 1h after real rTMS compared to baseline. Active motor threshold for the most caudally innervated hand muscle was increased at 72 and 120 h compared to baseline. Persistent reductions in EPT to rTMS occurred in two individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in cortical motor threshold measures may accompany functional gains to rTMS in SCI subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Electrophysiological measures may provide a useful adjunct to ASIA impairment scales. Copyright Â
© 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21600843     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  31 in total

1.  Placebo-controlled study of rTMS combined with Lokomat® gait training for treatment in subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Jesus Benito-Penalva; Josep Valls-Sole; Narda Murillo; Josep M Tormos; Cecilia Flores; Joan Vidal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Electrophysiological Outcome Measures in Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Radha Korupolu; Argyrios Stampas; Mani Singh; Ping Zhou; Gerard Francisco
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

3.  White matter changes in corticospinal tract associated with improvement in arm and hand functions in incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: pilot case series.

Authors:  Nuray Yozbatiran; Zafer Keser; Khader Hasan; Argyrios Stampas; Radha Korupolu; Sam Kim; Marcia K O'Malley; Felipe Fregni; Gerard E Francisco
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 4.  Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord--restoring motor function.

Authors:  Andrew Jackson; Jonas B Zimmermann
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Efficacy of QuadroPulse rTMS for improving motor function after spinal cord injury: Three case studies.

Authors:  Natalia Alexeeva; Blair Calancie
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Improvements in hand function in adults with chronic tetraplegia following a multiday 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention combined with repetitive task practice.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Engaging Cervical Spinal Cord Networks to Reenable Volitional Control of Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients.

Authors:  Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton; Morteza Modaber; Nicholas AuYong; Erika Morikawa; Sharon Zdunowski; Melanie E Sarino; Majid Sarrafzadeh; Marc R Nuwer; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Motor recovery after spinal cord injury enhanced by strengthening corticospinal synaptic transmission.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.