CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of repetitive QuadroPulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS(QP)) on hand/leg function after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Interventional proof-of-concept study. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Three adult subjects with cervical SCI. Interventions Repeated trains of magnetic stimuli were applied to the motor cortical hand/leg area. Several exploratory single-day rTMS(QP) protocols were examined. Ultimately we settled on a protocol using three 5-day trials of (1) rTMS(QP) only; (2) exercise only (targeting hand or leg function); and (3) rTMS(QP) combined with exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hand motor function was assessed by Purdue Pegboard and Complete Minnesota Dexterity tests. Walking function was based on treadmill walking and the Timed Up and Go test. Electromyographic recordings were used for neurophysiological testing of cortical (by single- and double-pulse TMS) and spinal (via tendon taps and electrical nerve stimulation) excitability. RESULTS: Single-day rTMS(QP) application had no clear effect in the 2 subjects whose hand function was targeted, but improved walking speed in the person targeted for walking, accompanied by increased cortical excitability and reduced spinal excitability. All 3 subjects showed functional improvement following the 5-day rTMS(QP) intervention, an effect being even more pronounced after the five-day combined rTMS(QP) + exercise sessions. There were no rTMS(QP)-associated adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a functional benefit of motor cortical rTMS(QP) after SCI. The effect of rTMS(QP) appears to be augmented when stimulation is accompanied by targeted exercises, warranting expansion of this pilot study to a larger subject population.
CONTEXT/ OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of repetitive QuadroPulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS(QP)) on hand/leg function after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Interventional proof-of-concept study. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Three adult subjects with cervical SCI. Interventions Repeated trains of magnetic stimuli were applied to the motor cortical hand/leg area. Several exploratory single-day rTMS(QP) protocols were examined. Ultimately we settled on a protocol using three 5-day trials of (1) rTMS(QP) only; (2) exercise only (targeting hand or leg function); and (3) rTMS(QP) combined with exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hand motor function was assessed by Purdue Pegboard and Complete Minnesota Dexterity tests. Walking function was based on treadmill walking and the Timed Up and Go test. Electromyographic recordings were used for neurophysiological testing of cortical (by single- and double-pulse TMS) and spinal (via tendon taps and electrical nerve stimulation) excitability. RESULTS: Single-day rTMS(QP) application had no clear effect in the 2 subjects whose hand function was targeted, but improved walking speed in the person targeted for walking, accompanied by increased cortical excitability and reduced spinal excitability. All 3 subjects showed functional improvement following the 5-day rTMS(QP) intervention, an effect being even more pronounced after the five-day combined rTMS(QP) + exercise sessions. There were no rTMS(QP)-associated adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a functional benefit of motor cortical rTMS(QP) after SCI. The effect of rTMS(QP) appears to be augmented when stimulation is accompanied by targeted exercises, warranting expansion of this pilot study to a larger subject population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Motor function; Rehabilitation; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Spinal cord injury
Authors: Tobias Bäumer; Rüdiger Lange; Joachim Liepert; Cornelius Weiller; Hartwig R Siebner; John C Rothwell; Alexander Münchau Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Natalia Alexeeva; Carol Sames; Patrick L Jacobs; Lori Hobday; Marcello M Distasio; Sarah A Mitchell; Blair Calancie Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Thomas S Kiser; Nancy B Reese; Twala Maresh; Stephen Hearn; Charlotte Yates; Robert D Skinner; T Glenn Pait; Edgar Garcia-Rill Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2005 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: P J Wrigley; S M Gustin; P M Macey; P G Nash; S C Gandevia; V G Macefield; P J Siddall; L A Henderson Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Patrick Freund; Nikolaus Weiskopf; John Ashburner; Katharina Wolf; Reto Sutter; Daniel R Altmann; Karl Friston; Alan Thompson; Armin Curt Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Aref-Ali Gharooni; Brian K Kwon; Michael G Fehlings; Timothy F Boerger; Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto; Paul Aarne Koljonen; Shekar N Kurpad; James S Harrop; Bizhan Aarabi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Jefferson R Wilson; Benjamin M Davies; Mark R N Kotter; James D Guest Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2022-02
Authors: Syed Faraz Kazim; Christian A Bowers; Chad D Cole; Samantha Varela; Zafar Karimov; Erick Martinez; Jonathan V Ogulnick; Meic H Schmidt Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 5.590