Literature DB >> 21600254

Losing weight without dieting. Use of commercial foods as meal replacements for lunch produces an extended energy deficit.

David A Levitsky1, Carly Pacanowski.   

Abstract

High-protein liquid meal replacements have proven to be effective in reducing caloric intake and body weight. Recently, substituting high fiber breakfast cereals for the more expensive high-protein drinks has been found to be equally effective to reduce weight. The following study tested the hypothesis that the mechanism responsible for the reduced intake was not the dietary composition of the meal replacement, but the controlled portion sized meals. Seventeen volunteers ate all of their meals and snacks from foods provided by the research unit from Monday to Friday for five consecutive weeks. For the first week, all participants selected their food from a buffet where each food was weighed before and after eating. For the next two weeks, half of the group selected their lunch by choosing one food from a selection of six commercially available portion controlled foods. They could eat as much as they wished at other meals or snacks. For final weeks four and five, the conditions were reversed for the two groups. Consuming the portion controlled lunches resulted in about a 250 kcal reduction in energy intake. More importantly, no sign of caloric compensation was evident across the 10 days of testing, an observation substantiated by a significant loss of body weight. The results suggest that the mere substitution of one smaller portioned meal each day is sufficient to cause reduction in daily energy intake and a significant amount of weight.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21600254     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  8 in total

Review 1.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

2.  One-year effects of a group-based lifestyle intervention in adults with type 2 diabetes: A randomized encouragement trial.

Authors:  David T Liss; Emily A Finch; Andrew Cooper; Avani Sheth; Ashantí D Tejuosho; Nicola Lancki; Ronald T Ackermann
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Portion Size and Ingestive Frequency on Energy Intake and Body Weight among Adults in Randomized Controlled Feeding Trials.

Authors:  Kelly A Higgins; Joshua L Hudson; Anna M R Hayes; Ethan Braun; Eunjin Cheon; Sam C Couture; Nilupa S Gunaratna; Erica R Hill; Stephanie R Hunter; Bethany S McGowan; Evan J Reister; Yu Wang; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 4.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

Review 5.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

6.  Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Ciarán G Forde; Yuejiao Cheng; Haohuan Xu; Nathalie Martin; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  What is the role of portion control in weight management?

Authors:  B J Rolls
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Variation in the Oral Processing of Everyday Meals Is Associated with Fullness and Meal Size; A Potential Nudge to Reduce Energy Intake?

Authors:  Danielle Ferriday; Matthew L Bosworth; Nicolas Godinot; Nathalie Martin; Ciarán G Forde; Emmy Van Den Heuvel; Sarah L Appleton; Felix J Mercer Moss; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.