| Literature DB >> 21599906 |
Sourav Sen Gupta1, Monzoorul Haque Mohammed, Tarini Shankar Ghosh, Suman Kanungo, Gopinath Balakrish Nair, Sharmila S Mande.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition, a major health problem, affects a significant proportion of preschool children in developing countries. The devastating consequences of malnutrition include diarrhoea, malabsorption, increased intestinal permeability, suboptimal immune response, etc. Nutritional interventions and dietary solutions have not been effective for treatment of malnutrition till date. Metagenomic procedures allow one to access the complex cross-talk between the gut and its microbial flora and understand how a different community composition affects various states of human health. In this study, a metagenomic approach was employed for analysing the differences between gut microbial communities obtained from a malnourished and an apparently healthy child.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21599906 PMCID: PMC3115890 DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-3-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Pathog ISSN: 1757-4749 Impact factor: 4.181
Figure 1Schematic diagram indicating taxa/lineages overabundant in malnourished and healthy child gut data sets. Area shaded in gray: Lineages observed to be overabundant in the malnourished child sampleBold boxes: Taxa abundant in the healthy child sample
Comparison of the taxonomic assignments obtained (using SPHINX algorithm) for malnourished and healthy samples at the taxonomic levels of family, order, class and phylum.
| % of sequences assigned | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxonomic Level | Taxon Name | Malnourished Sample (X) | Healthy Sample (Y) | Relative Ratio (X/Y) | Inference |
| Clostridiaceae | 5.9 | 4 | 1.5 | - | |
| Bacillaceae | 3.7 | 4.9 | 0.8 | - | |
| Family | Staphylococcaceae | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.6 | - |
| Clostridiales | 7.09 | 8.36 | 0.85 | - | |
| Bacillales | 10.09 | 12.84 | 0.79 | - | |
| Order | |||||
| Clostridia | 6.46 | 6.6 | 0.98 | - | |
| Bacilli | 16.77 | 20.49 | 0.82 | - | |
| Class | Alphaproteobacteria | 1.75 | 2.43 | 0.72 | - |
| Methanomicrobia | 1.88 | 2.96 | 0.64 | - | |
| Phylum | Proteobacteria | 49.78 | 50.61 | 0.98 | - |
| Firmicutes | 24.28 | 26.27 | 0.92 | - | |
Note: 1. Only those taxa which had at least 2% of the sequences assigned to it (in either samples) were considered for comparison
2. For each taxa, the relative ratio was obtained by dividing the percentage of a taxon observed in the malnourished sample by the percentage of the same taxon in the healthy sample.
3. Those taxa having a relative ratio of more than 1.5 or not present in the healthy sample were tagged as 'High in malnourished', while those taxa which had a relative ratio of less than 0.6 were tagged as 'High in healthy'.
Figure 2Schematic diagram showing the taxonomic distribution of sequences identified as specific to malnourished and healthy child gut data sets. Bold black boxes: Taxa associated with sequences identified as specific to malnourished child data setBold grey boxes: Taxa associated with sequences identified as specific to healthy child data set
Comparison of the taxonomic assignments obtained (using SPHINX algorithm) for sequences specific to malnourished and healthy samples (at the taxonomic level of order)
| % of sequences assigned | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order Name | Malnourished sample (X) | Healthy Sample (Y) | Relative Ratio (X/Y) | Inference |
| Campylobacterales | 78.87 | 0.06 | 1235.57 | High in malnourished |
| Clostridiales | 11.4 | 0.1 | 119.1 | High in malnourished |
| Lactobacillales | 0.79 | 3.19 | 0.25 | High in healthy |
| Enterobacteriales | 0.11 | 5.07 | 0.02 | High in healthy |
| Pseudomonadales | 0.04 | 5.27 | 0.01 | High in healthy |
| Chloroflexales | 0.02 | 4.44 | 0 | High in healthy |
| Desulfurovibrionales | 0 | 4.44 | 0 | High in healthy |
| Bifidobacteriales | 0 | 6.98 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Xanthomonadales | 0 | 3.21 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Plantomycetales | 0 | 2.13 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Halobacteriales | 0 | 12.24 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Actinomycetales | 0 | 19.72 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Burkholderiales | 0 | 19.39 | N.A | High in healthy |
| Rhizobiales | 0 | 2.39 | N.A | High in healthy |
Functional analysis of sample (malnourished/healthy) specific sequences
| Subsystem category | % of Malnourished specific sequences (X) | % of Healthy specific sequences (Y) | Relative Ratio (X/Y) | Relative Ratio (Y/X) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motility and Chemotaxis | 4.18 | 0.04 | 104.5 | 0.01 |
| Membrane Transport | 2.12 | 0.21 | 10.1 | 0.1 |
| Respiration | 5.37 | 1.28 | 4.2 | 0.24 |
| Virulence | 9.49 | 5.28 | 1.8 | 0.56 |
| Stress Response | 1.95 | 1.83 | 1.07 | 0.94 |
| Protein Metabolism | 12.1 | 11.44 | 1.06 | 0.95 |
| Amino Acids and Derivatives | 8.45 | 8.54 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
| DNA Metabolism | 7.01 | 7.37 | 0.95 | 1.05 |
| Cofactors, Vitamins, Prosthetic groups and pigments | 7.07 | 7.71 | 0.92 | 1.09 |
| Cell wall and Capsule | 6.52 | 7.38 | 0.88 | 1.13 |
| Carbohydrates | 5.78 | 7.95 | 0.73 | 1.38 |
| Clustering-based Subsystems | 11.5 | 16.24 | 0.71 | 1.41 |
| RNA Metabolism | 5.11 | 7.58 | 0.67 | 1.48 |
| Cell Division and Cell Cycle | 1.61 | 2.43 | 0.66 | 1.51 |
| Unclassified | 2.26 | 4.45 | 0.51 | 1.97 |
| Nucleosides and Nucleotides | 3.38 | 6.66 | 0.51 | 1.97 |
Note: Only those subsystem categories which had at least 1.5% of the sequences assigned to it were considered for comparison
Figure 3Pi chart illustrating taxonomic and functional characterization (subsystems and associated PEGs) of the malnourished-specific sequences. Innermost layer: Identified subsystem categoriesMiddle layer: Taxonomic mapping of specific sequences within each categoryOuter layer: PEGs associated with each identified subsystem
Figure 4Schematic diagram indicating the overall differences between microbial communities residing in the gut of a malnourished and a healthy child.