Literature DB >> 21599734

In-hospital birth center with the same medical guidelines as standard care: a comparative study of obstetric interventions and outcomes.

Karin Gottvall1, Ulla Waldenström, Charlotta Tingstig, Charlotta Grunewald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A challenge of obstetric care is to optimize maternal and infant health outcomes and the mother's experience of childbirth with the least possible intervention in the normal process. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of modified birth center care on obstetric procedures during delivery and on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
METHODS: In a cohort study 2,555 women who signed in for birth center care during pregnancy were compared with all 9,382 low-risk women who gave birth in the standard delivery ward in the same hospital from March 2004 to July 2008. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) and adjusted for maternal background characteristics, elective cesarean section, and gestational age.
RESULTS: The modified birth center group included fewer emergency cesarean sections (primiparas: OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83; multiparas: OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51), and in multiparas the vacuum extraction rate was reduced (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.67). In addition, epidural analgesia was used less frequently (primiparas: OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.41-0.53; multiparas: OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.20-0.32). Fetal distress was less frequently diagnosed in the modified birth center group (primiparas: OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.87; multiparas: OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.29-0.69), but no statistically significant differences were found in neonatal hypoxia, low Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes, or proportion of perinatal deaths (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.14-1.13). Anal sphincter tears were reduced (primiparas: OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.98; multiparas: OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.83).
CONCLUSION: Midwife-led comprehensive care with the same medical guidelines as in standard care reduced medical interventions without jeopardizing maternal and infant health.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21599734     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  13 in total

1.  Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Authors:  Margaret H O'Hara; Linda M Frazier; Travis W Stembridge; Robert S McKay; Sandra N Mohr; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Researching and Respecting the Intricacies of Isolated Communities.

Authors:  Amy A Blumling; Tami L Thomas; Dionne P Stephens
Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care       Date:  2013

3.  Defining and describing birth centres in the Netherlands - a component study of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.

Authors:  M A A Hermus; I C Boesveld; M Hitzert; A Franx; J P de Graaf; E A P Steegers; T A Wiegers; K M van der Pal-de Bruin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Quality of care provided in two Scottish rural community maternity units: a retrospective case review.

Authors:  Sara Denham; Tracy Humphrey; Ruth Taylor
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ingrid Jepsen; Svend Juul; Maralyn Jean Foureur; Erik Elgaard Sørensen; Ellen Aagaard Nohr
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a "birth environment room" versus a standard labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience.

Authors:  Iben Lorentzen; Charlotte Sander Andersen; Henriette Svenstrup Jensen; Ann Fogsgaard; Maralyn Foureur; Finn Friis Lauszus; Ellen Aagaard Nohr
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-02-15

7.  Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; María Pueyo; Herminia Biescas; Cristina Colls; Isabel Espiga; Joanna White; Xavi Espada; Josep Fusté; Vicente Ortún
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?

Authors:  Trudy Klomp; Ank de Jonge; Eileen K Hutton; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Different settings of place of midwife-led birth: evaluation of a midwife-led birth centre.

Authors:  Jacoba van der Kooy; Johanna P de Graaf; Doctor Erwin Birnie; Semiha Denktas; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-18

10.  Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.

Authors:  Stine Bernitz; Pål Øian; Leiv Sandvik; Ellen Blix
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.