Literature DB >> 21598906

A comparison of different QSAR approaches to modeling CYP450 1A2 inhibition.

Sergii Novotarskyi1, Iurii Sushko, Robert Körner, Anil Kumar Pandey, Igor V Tetko.   

Abstract

Prediction of CYP450 inhibition activity of small molecules poses an important task due to high risk of drug-drug interactions. CYP1A2 is an important member of CYP450 superfamily and accounts for 15% of total CYP450 presence in human liver. This article compares 80 in-silico QSAR models that were created by following the same procedure with different combinations of descriptors and machine learning methods. The training and test sets consist of 3745 and 3741 inhibitors and noninhibitors from PubChem BioAssay database. A heterogeneous external test set of 160 inhibitors was collected from literature. The studied descriptor sets involve E-state, Dragon and ISIDA SMF descriptors. Machine learning methods involve Associative Neural Networks (ASNN), K Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Random Tree (RT), C4.5 Tree (J48), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). The influence of descriptor selection on model accuracy was studied. The benefits of "bagging" modeling approach were shown. Applicability domain approach was successfully applied in this study and ways of increasing model accuracy through use of applicability domain measures were demonstrated as well as fragment-based model interpretation was performed. The most accurate models in this study achieved values of 83% and 68% correctly classified instances on the internal and external test sets, respectively. The applicability domain approach allowed increasing the prediction accuracy to 90% for 78% of the internal and 17% of the external test sets, respectively. The most accurate models are available online at http://ochem.eu/models/Q5747 .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598906     DOI: 10.1021/ci200091h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  16 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm shift in toxicity testing and modeling.

Authors:  Hongmao Sun; Menghang Xia; Christopher P Austin; Ruili Huang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 3.  On exploring structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

4.  A unified proteochemometric model for prediction of inhibition of cytochrome p450 isoforms.

Authors:  Maris Lapins; Apilak Worachartcheewan; Ola Spjuth; Valentin Georgiev; Virapong Prachayasittikul; Chanin Nantasenamat; Jarl E S Wikberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development of dimethyl sulfoxide solubility models using 163,000 molecules: using a domain applicability metric to select more reliable predictions.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Sergii Novotarskyi; Iurii Sushko; Vladimir Ivanov; Alexander E Petrenko; Reiner Dieden; Florence Lebon; Benoit Mathieu
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Robustness in experimental design: A study on the reliability of selection approaches.

Authors:  Stefan Brandmaier; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 7.  Insights on cytochrome p450 enzymes and inhibitors obtained through QSAR studies.

Authors:  Jayalakshmi Sridhar; Jiawang Liu; Maryam Foroozesh; Cheryl L Klein Stevens
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Linear Interaction Energy Based Prediction of Cytochrome P450 1A2 Binding Affinities with Reliability Estimation.

Authors:  Luigi Capoferri; Marlies C A Verkade-Vreeker; Danny Buitenhuis; Jan N M Commandeur; Manuel Pastor; Nico P E Vermeulen; Daan P Geerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The development of models to predict melting and pyrolysis point data associated with several hundred thousand compounds mined from PATENTS.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Daniel M Lowe; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  ToxCast EPA in Vitro to in Vivo Challenge: Insight into the Rank-I Model.

Authors:  Sergii Novotarskyi; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Yurii Sushko; Robert Körner; Joachim Vogt; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.