BACKGROUND: Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS) is a rare high-grade sarcoma that has lipoblastic differentiation. In this study, the authors evaluated PLS natural history, patient outcomes, and commonly deregulated protein biomarkers. METHODS: Medical records from patients (n = 155) who had PLS from 1993 to 2010 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognosticators. A PLS tissue microarray (TMA) (n = 56 patient specimens) was constructed for immunohistochemical analysis of molecular markers, and p53 gene sequencing (exons 5-9) was conducted. RESULTS: The average patient age was 57 years, and the patients presented with primary disease (n = 102), recurrent disease (n = 16), and metastatic disease (n = 37). Lower extremity was the most common disease site (40%), and the average tumor size was 11 cm. Complete follow-up data were available for 83 patients, and their median follow-up was 22.6 months. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 53%; and recurrent disease, unresectability, and microscopic positive margins were identified as predictors of a poor prognosis. Systemic relapse (the strongest poor prognostic determinant) developed in 35% of patients with localized PLS. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (an adipogenic marker), B-cell leukemia 2 and survivin (survival factors), vascular endothelial growth factor (an angiogenic factor), matrix metalloproteinase 2, and other biomarkers. Frequent loss of retinoblastoma protein expression and high p53 mutation rates (approximately 60%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PLS is an aggressive, metastasizing sarcoma. Identifying ubiquitous molecular events underlying PLS progression is crucial for progress in patient management and outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS) is a rare high-grade sarcoma that has lipoblastic differentiation. In this study, the authors evaluated PLS natural history, patient outcomes, and commonly deregulated protein biomarkers. METHODS: Medical records from patients (n = 155) who had PLS from 1993 to 2010 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognosticators. A PLS tissue microarray (TMA) (n = 56 patient specimens) was constructed for immunohistochemical analysis of molecular markers, and p53 gene sequencing (exons 5-9) was conducted. RESULTS: The average patient age was 57 years, and the patients presented with primary disease (n = 102), recurrent disease (n = 16), and metastatic disease (n = 37). Lower extremity was the most common disease site (40%), and the average tumor size was 11 cm. Complete follow-up data were available for 83 patients, and their median follow-up was 22.6 months. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 53%; and recurrent disease, unresectability, and microscopic positive margins were identified as predictors of a poor prognosis. Systemic relapse (the strongest poor prognostic determinant) developed in 35% of patients with localized PLS. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (an adipogenic marker), B-cell leukemia 2 and survivin (survival factors), vascular endothelial growth factor (an angiogenic factor), matrix metalloproteinase 2, and other biomarkers. Frequent loss of retinoblastoma protein expression and high p53 mutation rates (approximately 60%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS:PLS is an aggressive, metastasizing sarcoma. Identifying ubiquitous molecular events underlying PLS progression is crucial for progress in patient management and outcomes.
Authors: G D Demetri; C D Fletcher; E Mueller; P Sarraf; R Naujoks; N Campbell; B M Spiegelman; S Singer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jilong Yang; Xiaoling Du; Kexin Chen; Antti Ylipää; Alexander J F Lazar; Jonathan Trent; Dina Lev; Raphael Pollock; Xishan Hao; Kelly Hunt; Wei Zhang Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Stefan M Willems; Alex B Mohseny; Crina Balog; Raj Sewrajsing; Inge H Briaire-de Bruijn; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Raf Sciot; Christopher D M Fletcher; André M Deelder; Karoly Szuhai; Paul J Hensbergen; Pancras C W Hogendoorn Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Antoine Italiano; Chun-Liang Chen; Rachael Thomas; Matthew Breen; Françoise Bonnet; Nicolas Sevenet; Michel Longy; Robert G Maki; Jean-Michel Coindre; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Elizabeth G Demicco; Paul W Harms; Rajiv M Patel; Steven C Smith; Davis Ingram; Keila Torres; Shannon L Carskadon; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Jonathan B McHugh; Javed Siddiqui; Nallasivam Palanisamy; David R Lucas; Alexander J Lazar; Wei-Lien Wang Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Sandhya Noronha; Lauren A C Alt; Taylor E Scimeca; Omran Zarou; Justyna Obrzut; Brian Zanotti; Elizabeth A Hayward; Akhil Pillai; Shubha Mathur; Joseph Rojas; Ribhi Salamah; Nalini Chandar; Michael J Fay Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: William W Tseng; Neeta Somaiah; Alexander J Lazar; Dina C Lev; Raphael E Pollock Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 6.639