Literature DB >> 21598171

Locational differences in mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey.

Joanna Burger1, Christian Jeitner, Michael Gochfeld.   

Abstract

Individuals who fish, and their families that ingest self-caught fish, make decisions about where to fish, what type of fish to eat, and the quantity of fish to eat. While federal and state agencies often issue consumption advisories for some fish with high mercury (Hg) concentrations, advisories seldom provide the actual metal levels to the general public. There are few data for most saltwater fish, and even less information on variations in Hg levels in fish within a state or geographical region. The objective of this study was to provide Hg concentrations from 19 species of fish caught in different locations in New Jersey to (1) test the hypothesis that mean metal levels vary geographically, (2) provide this information to individuals who fish these coastal waters, and (3) provide a range of values for risk assessors who deal with saltwater fish exposure in the Northeastern United States. Selenium (Se) was also examined because of its purported moderating effect on the toxicity of Hg. Hg levels showed significant geographical variation for 10 of 14 species that were caught in more than one region of New Jersey, but there were significant locational differences for Se in only 5 of the fish. Mercury levels were significantly lower in fish collected from northern New Jersey (except for ling, Molva molva), compared to other regions. As might be expected, locational differences in Hg levels were greatest for fish species with the highest Hg concentrations (shark, Isurus oxyrinchus; tuna, Thunnus thynnus and T. albacares; striped bass, Morone saxatilis; bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix). Fishers and their families might reduce their risk from Hg exposure not only by selecting fish generally lower in Hg, but by fishing predominantly in some regions over others, further lowering the potential risk. Health professionals might use these data to advise patients on which fish are safest to consume (in terms of Hg exposure) from particular geographical regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598171      PMCID: PMC4300130          DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2011.570231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  27 in total

1.  Maternal seafood diet, methylmercury exposure, and neonatal neurologic function.

Authors:  U Steuerwald; P Weihe; P J Jørgensen; K Bjerve; J Brock; B Heinzow; E Budtz-Jørgensen; P Grandjean
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Fish oil-derived fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid, and the risk of acute coronary events: the Kuopio ischaemic heart disease risk factor study.

Authors:  T Rissanen; S Voutilainen; K Nyyssönen; T A Lakka; J T Salonen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Elevated blood mercury and neuro-otological observations in children of the Ecuadorian gold mines.

Authors:  S Allen Counter; Leo H Buchanan; Fernando Ortega; Göran Laurell
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2002-01-25

4.  Comparative baseline levels of mercury, Hsp 70 and Hsp 60 in subsistence fish from the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta region of Alaska.

Authors:  L K Duffy; E Scofield; T Rodgers; M Patton; R T Bowyer
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol       Date:  1999-10

5.  Ethnic differences in risk from mercury among Savannah River fishermen.

Authors:  J Burger; K F Gaines; M Gochfeld
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eliseo Guallar; M Inmaculada Sanz-Gallardo; Pieter van't Veer; Peter Bode; Antti Aro; Jorge Gómez-Aracena; Jeremy D Kark; Rudolph A Riemersma; José M Martín-Moreno; Frans J Kok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Toxicology and immunotoxicology of mercury: a comparative review in fish and humans.

Authors:  L I Sweet; J T Zelikoff
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 9.  Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and absorption.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.291

10.  Mercury levels in high-end consumers of fish.

Authors:  Jane M Hightower; Dan Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bioaccumulation of As, Hg, and Se in tunas Thunnus albacares and Katsuwonus pelamis from the Eastern Pacific: tissue distribution and As speciation.

Authors:  Jorge Ruelas-Inzunza; Zdenka Šlejkovec; Darja Mazej; Vesna Fajon; Milena Horvat; Mauricio Ramos-Osuna
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mercury Contamination in Diamondback Terrapins in New Jersey.

Authors:  Natalie Sherwood; Meiyin Wu; Peddrick Weis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Seasonal, locational and size variations in mercury and selenium levels in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from New Jersey.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld; Joanna Burger; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Taryn Pittfield
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 4.  Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Robin A Bernhoft
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2011-12-22

5.  Heavy Metals in Biota in Delaware Bay, NJ: Developing a Food Web Approach to Contaminants.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Nellie Tsipoura; Larry Niles; Amanda Dey; Christian Jeitner; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2019-06-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.