Literature DB >> 21292311

Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season.

Joanna Burger1, Michael Gochfeld.   

Abstract

There are few data on risks to biota and humans from mercury levels in saltwater fish. This paper examines mercury and selenium levels in muscle of 19 species of fish caught by recreational fisherfolk off the New Jersey shore, as a function of species of fish, size, and season, and risk of mercury to consumers. Average mercury levels ranged from 0.01 ppm (wet weight) (Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus) to 1.83 ppm (Mako Shark Isurus oxyrinchus). There were four categories of mercury levels: very high (only Mako), high (averaging 0.3-0.5 ppm, 3 species), medium (0.14-0.20 ppm, 10 species), and low (below 0.13 ppm, 5 species). Average selenium levels for the fish species ranged from 0.18 ppm to 0.58 ppm, and had lower variability than mercury (coefficient of variation=38.3 vs 69.1%), consistent with homeostatic regulation of this essential element. The correlation between mercury and selenium was significantly positive for five and negative for two species. Mercury levels showed significant positive correlations with fish size for ten species. Size was the best predictor of mercury levels. Selenium showed no consistent relationship to fish length. Over half of the fish species had some individual fish with mercury levels over 0.3 ppm, and a third had fish with levels over 0.5 ppm, levels that pose a human health risk for high end consumers. Conversely several fish species had no individuals above 0.5 ppm, and few above 0.3 ppm, suggesting that people who eat fish frequently, can reduce their risk from mercury by selecting which species (and which size) to consume. Overall, with the exception of shark, Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus), Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) and Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), the species sampled are generally medium to low in mercury concentration. Selenium:mercury molar ratios were generally above 1:1, except for the Mako shark.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292311      PMCID: PMC4300121          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  75 in total

1.  Estimation of fish consumption and methylmercury intake in the New Jersey population.

Authors:  A H Stern; L R Korn; B E Ruppel
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec

2.  In utero methylmercury exposure differentially affects the activities of selenoenzymes in the fetal mouse brain.

Authors:  C Watanabe; K Yoshida; Y Kasanuma; Y Kun; H Satoh
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Body burdens of mercury in lower Hudson River area anglers.

Authors:  Alayne K Gobeille; Kimberly B Morland; Richard F Bopp; James H Godbold; Philip J Landrigan
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  DNA barcodes reveal species-specific mercury levels in tuna sushi that pose a health risk to consumers.

Authors:  Jacob H Lowenstein; Joanna Burger; Christian W Jeitner; George Amato; Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Selenium and mercury in the Brazilian Amazon: opposing influences on age-related cataracts.

Authors:  Mélanie Lemire; Myriam Fillion; Benoît Frenette; Annie Mayer; Aline Philibert; Carlos José Sousa Passos; Jean Rémy Davée Guimarães; Fernando Júnior Barbosa; Donna Mergler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and absorption.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Maternal fish intake during pregnancy, blood mercury levels, and child cognition at age 3 years in a US cohort.

Authors:  Emily Oken; Jenny S Radesky; Robert O Wright; David C Bellinger; Chitra J Amarasiriwardena; Ken P Kleinman; Howard Hu; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Mercury accumulation in relation to size and age of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus harengus) from the southwestern Bay of Fundy, Canada.

Authors:  B M Braune
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Authors:  Cindy Jardine; Steve Hrudey; John Shortreed; Lorraine Craig; Daniel Krewski; Chris Furgal; Stephen McColl
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.393

10.  Factors affecting mercury and selenium levels in New Jersey flatfish: low risk to human consumers.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Sheila Shukla; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2009
View more
  39 in total

1.  Interspecific and intraspecific variation in selenium:mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from the Aleutians: potential protection on mercury toxicity by selenium.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Taryn Pittfield
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Selenium and mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from New Jersey: individual and species variability complicate use in human health fish consumption advisories.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Lead (Pb) in biota and perceptions of Pb exposure at a recently designated Superfund beach site in New Jersey.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Christian Jeitner; Mark Donio; Taryn Pittfield
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

4.  Ecological and biological determinants of methylmercury accumulation in tropical coastal fish.

Authors:  Tércia G Seixas; Isabel Moreira; Olaf Malm; Helena A Kehrig
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Tracking mercury in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean: the use of tuna and tuna-like species as indicators of bioavailability.

Authors:  Bárbara Moura Reis Manhães; Alice de Souza Picaluga; Tatiana Lemos Bisi; Alexandre de Freitas Azevedo; João Paulo Machado Torres; Olaf Malm; José Lailson-Brito
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Mercury health risk assessment among a young adult Lebanese population.

Authors:  Pierre J Obeid; Souha A Fares; Ghada N Farhat; Bilal El-Khoury; Rana M Nassif; John El-Nakat; Hassan R Dhaini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Element levels in cultured and wild sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) from the Adriatic Sea and potential risk assessment.

Authors:  Petra Zvab Rožič; Tadej Dolenec; Branimir Baždarić; Vatroslav Karamarko; Goran Kniewald; Matej Dolenec
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Mercury biomagnification in subtropical reservoir fishes of eastern China.

Authors:  N Roxanna Razavi; Mingzhi Qu; Binsong Jin; Wenwei Ren; Yuxiang Wang; Linda M Campbell
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Heavy metal content in oysters (Crassostrea gigas) cultured in the Ebro Delta in Catalonia, Spain.

Authors:  Victoria Ochoa; Carlos Barata; M Carmen Riva
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Global DNA methylation loss associated with mercury contamination and aging in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).

Authors:  Frances M Nilsen; Benjamin B Parrott; John A Bowden; Brittany L Kassim; Stephen E Somerville; Teresa A Bryan; Colleen E Bryan; Ted R Lange; J Patrick Delaney; Arnold M Brunell; Stephen E Long; Louis J Guillette
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.