PURPOSE: The authors present a protocol for the in vivo evaluation, using different imaging techniques, of lymph node (LN) homing of tumor-specific dendritic cells (DCs) in a murine breast cancer model. PROCEDURES: Bone marrow DCs were labeled with paramagnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) or (111)In-oxine. Antigen loading was performed using tumor lysate. Mature DCs were injected into the footpads of transgenic tumor-bearing mice (MMTV-Ras) and DC migration was tracked by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Ex vivo analyses were performed to validate the imaging data. RESULTS: DC labeling, both with MNPs and with (111)In-oxine, did not affect DC phenotype or functionality. MRI and SPECT allowed the detection of iron and (111)In in both axillary and popliteal LNs. Immunohistochemistry and γ-counting revealed the presence of DCs in LNs. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and SPECT imaging, by allowing in vivo dynamic monitoring of DC migration, could further the development and optimization of efficient anti-cancer vaccines.
PURPOSE: The authors present a protocol for the in vivo evaluation, using different imaging techniques, of lymph node (LN) homing of tumor-specific dendritic cells (DCs) in a murinebreast cancer model. PROCEDURES: Bone marrow DCs were labeled with paramagnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) or (111)In-oxine. Antigen loading was performed using tumor lysate. Mature DCs were injected into the footpads of transgenic tumor-bearing mice (MMTV-Ras) and DC migration was tracked by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Ex vivo analyses were performed to validate the imaging data. RESULTS: DC labeling, both with MNPs and with (111)In-oxine, did not affect DC phenotype or functionality. MRI and SPECT allowed the detection of iron and (111)In in both axillary and popliteal LNs. Immunohistochemistry and γ-counting revealed the presence of DCs in LNs. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and SPECT imaging, by allowing in vivo dynamic monitoring of DC migration, could further the development and optimization of efficient anti-cancer vaccines.
Authors: Saho Kobukai; Richard Baheza; Jared G Cobb; Jack Virostko; Jingping Xie; Amelie Gillman; Dmitry Koktysh; Denny Kerns; Mark Does; John C Gore; Wellington Pham Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stephanie E A Gratton; Patricia A Ropp; Patrick D Pohlhaus; J Christopher Luft; Victoria J Madden; Mary E Napier; Joseph M DeSimone Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brooke M Helfer; Anthony Balducci; Aaron D Nelson; Jelena M Janjic; Roberto R Gil; Pawel Kalinski; I Jolanda M de Vries; Eric T Ahrens; Robbie B Mailliard Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: Zhuoli Zhang; Weiguo Li; Daniele Procissi; Kangan Li; Alexander Y Sheu; Andrew C Gordon; Yang Guo; Khashayarsha Khazaie; Yi Huan; Guohong Han; Andrew C Larson Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ho Won Lee; Seung Yun Yoon; Thoudam Debraj Singh; Yoon Ju Choi; Hong Je Lee; Ji Young Park; Shin Young Jeong; Sang-Woo Lee; Jeoung-Hee Ha; Byeong-Cheol Ahn; Yong Hyun Jeon; Jaetae Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marketa Ryvolova; Jana Chomoucka; Jana Drbohlavova; Pavel Kopel; Petr Babula; David Hynek; Vojtech Adam; Tomas Eckschlager; Jaromir Hubalek; Marie Stiborova; Jozef Kaiser; Rene Kizek Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Melanie R Rutkowski; Michael J Allegrezza; Nikolaos Svoronos; Amelia J Tesone; Tom L Stephen; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt; Jenny Nguyen; Paul J Zhang; Steven N Fiering; Julia Tchou; Jose R Conejo-Garcia Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 1.355