Literature DB >> 21598058

Making contact: rooting out the potential for exposure of commercial production swine facilities to feral swine in North Carolina.

Richard Engeman1, Carl Betsill, Tom Ray.   

Abstract

Despite North Carolina's long history with feral swine, populations were low or absent in eastern counties until the 1990s. Feral swine populations have since grown in these counties which also contain a high density of commercial production swine (CPS) facilities. Sixteen of the highest swine producing U.S. counties also populated with feral swine are in North Carolina. Disconcertingly, since 2009, positive tests for exposure to swine brucellosis or pseudorabies virus have been found for feral swine. We surveyed 120 CSP facilities across four eastern counties to document the level and perception of feral swine activity around CSP facilities and to identify disease transmission potential to commercial stock. Nearly all facility operators (97%) recognized feral swine were in their counties. Far fewer said they had feral swine activity nearby (18%). Our inspections found higher presence than perceived with feral swine sign at 19% of facilities where operators said they had never observed feral swine or their sign. Nearly 90% expressed concern about feral to domestic disease transmission, yet only two facilities had grain bins or feeders fenced against wildlife access. Due to increasing feral swine populations, recent evidence of disease in feral populations, the importance of swine production to North Carolina's economy and the national pork industry, and potential for feral-domestic contact, we believe feral swine pose an increasing disease transmission threat warranting a stringent look at biosecurity and feral swine management at North Carolina CPS facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21598058     DOI: 10.1007/s10393-011-0688-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecohealth        ISSN: 1612-9202            Impact factor:   3.184


  5 in total

1.  Mechanisms of transmission of Aujeszky's disease virus originating from feral swine in the USA.

Authors:  E C Hahn; G R Page; P S Hahn; K D Gillis; C Romero; J A Annelli; E P Gibbs
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Survival of pseudorabies virus in the presence of selected diluents and fomites.

Authors:  M A Schoenbaum; J D Freund; G W Beran
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Analysis of a series of outbreaks of Aujeszky's disease in Yorkshire in 1981-82: the possibility of airborne disease spread.

Authors:  J Gloster; A I Donaldson; M N Hough
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1984-03-10       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Pathogen exposure in feral swine populations geographically associated with high densities of transitional swine premises and commercial swine production.

Authors:  Joseph L Corn; James C Cumbee; Rendall Barfoot; Gene A Erickson
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.535

5.  Experimental airborne transmission of PRRS virus.

Authors:  C S Kristensen; A Bøtner; H Takai; J P Nielsen; S E Jorsal
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Exposure of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States to selected pathogens.

Authors:  John A Baroch; Carl A Gagnon; Sonia Lacouture; Marcelo Gottschalk
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Wild boar visits to commercial pig farms in southwest England: implications for disease transmission.

Authors:  Sonny A Bacigalupo; Linda K Dixon; Simon Gubbins; Adam J Kucharski; Julian A Drewe
Journal:  Eur J Wildl Res       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 3.  The Wild Side of Disease Control at the Wildlife-Livestock-Human Interface: A Review.

Authors:  Christian Gortazar; Iratxe Diez-Delgado; Jose Angel Barasona; Joaquin Vicente; Jose De La Fuente; Mariana Boadella
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Towards a unified generic framework to define and observe contacts between livestock and wildlife: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sonny A Bacigalupo; Linda K Dixon; Simon Gubbins; Adam J Kucharski; Julian A Drewe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.