Literature DB >> 19617481

Pathogen exposure in feral swine populations geographically associated with high densities of transitional swine premises and commercial swine production.

Joseph L Corn1, James C Cumbee, Rendall Barfoot, Gene A Erickson.   

Abstract

Surveys for evidence of exposure to pseudorabies virus (PRV), Brucella suis, swine influenza virus (SIV; human-like H1N1, reassortant type H1N1, H1N2-like H1N1 and H3N2), porcine circovirus 2 (PCV 2), and porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus (PRRSV) in feral swine (Sus scrofa) were conducted in areas where feral swine were geographically associated with high densities of transitional swine premises in South Carolina and high densities of commercial swine production in North Carolina. In South Carolina, 10/50 (20.0%), 7/50 (14.0%), and 29/49 (59.2%) feral swine tested antibody positive for PRV, B. suis, and PCV-2, respectively. Antibodies to PRRSV (0/49) and SIV (0/49) were not detected. In North Carolina, antibodies to PRV and B. suis were not detected in serum samples from 120 feral swine; however, antibodies to PRRSV (1/120 [0.8%]), PCV-2 (86/120 [71.7%]; these included 80 positives plus six suspects), and SIV (108/119 [90.7%]) were present. The presence of PRV and B. suis in South Carolina may have been due to the introduction of infected feral swine into the area or to a previous association of feral swine with infected transitional swine. Their absence in the North Carolina populations may have been due to the absence of these disease agents in the feral swine originally introduced into the area and the lack of a potential for contact with infected commercial swine. Feral swine associated with commercial swine in North Carolina may have been exposed to SIV subtypes circulating in commercial swine via airborne spread of SIV from commercial swine facilities. Feral swine seropositive for PCV-2 were prevalent in both states, which may indicate efficient transmission from commercial swine and transitional swine, or that PCV-2 is widespread in feral swine. The low prevalence of animals with antibodies against PRRSV may indicate a less-than-efficient means of transmission from commercial to feral swine. Additional epidemiologic studies are needed to understand the risks and mechanisms of transmission of disease agents among commercial, transitional, and feral swine, and the role of feral swine as reservoirs of these disease agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617481     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-45.3.713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  20 in total

1.  Preferential sexual transmission of pseudorabies virus in feral swine populations may not account for observed seroprevalence in the USA.

Authors:  Gary Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Making contact: rooting out the potential for exposure of commercial production swine facilities to feral swine in North Carolina.

Authors:  Richard Engeman; Carl Betsill; Tom Ray
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Brucellosis due to Brucella suis in a swine herd associated with a human clinical case in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Raphaella Barbosa Meirelles-Bartoli; Luis Antonio Mathias; Luis Ernesto Samartino
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Governmental provisions to manage and eradicate feral swine in areas of the United States.

Authors:  Terence J Centner; Rebecca M Shuman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Long-Term Surveillance of Aujeszky's Disease in the Alpine Wild Boar (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Mario Chiari; Nicola Ferrari; Marco Bertoletti; Dominga Avisani; Monica Cerioli; Mariagrazia Zanoni; Loris G Alborali; Paolo Lanfranchi; Davide Lelli; Ana Moreno Martin; Lavazza Antonio
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.184

Review 6.  Is There a Risk for Introducing Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Through the Legal Importation of Pork?

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder; Raymond R R Rowland
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Restricted enzooticity of hepatitis E virus genotypes 1 to 4 in the United States.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Jihong Meng; Xing Dai; Jiu-Hong Liang; Alicia R Feagins; Xiang-Jin Meng; Natalia M Belfiore; Carol Bradford; Joseph L Corn; Carolyn Cray; Gregory E Glass; Melvin L Gordon; Richard A Hesse; Donald L Montgomery; William L Nicholson; Anthony A Pilny; Sheela Ramamoorthy; Douglas D Shaver; Jan Drobeniuc; Michael A Purdy; Howard A Fields; Saleem Kamili; Chong-Gee Teo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Wild boar: an increasing concern for Aujeszky's disease control in pigs?

Authors:  Mariana Boadella; Christian Gortázar; Joaquín Vicente; Francisco Ruiz-Fons
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Exposure of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States to selected pathogens.

Authors:  John A Baroch; Carl A Gagnon; Sonia Lacouture; Marcelo Gottschalk
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.310

10.  Epidemiological survey of swine influenza A virus in the wild boar population of two Italian provinces.

Authors:  Emanuela Foni; Chiara Garbarino; Chiara Chiapponi; Laura Baioni; Irene Zanni; Paolo Cordioli
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.