Literature DB >> 21596660

PITASOR epidemiological study: prevalence, incidence and treatment of anaemia in radiation therapy oncology departments in Spain.

Pilar M Samper Ots1, Julia Muñoz, Albert Biete, María José Ortiz, María Acuña, Joaquín Cabrera, Concepción López Carrizosa, Eloisa Bayo, Ismael Herruzo, María Mar Pérez, Miguel A Domínguez, Virginia Morillo Macías, Moisés Mira, Ana María Pérez Casas, María Mar Sevillano, Isabel García Ríos, Francisco Andreu, Amalia Sotoca, Ana Álvarez, Escarlata López, María Ángeles Pérez Escutia, Armando Loayza Villaroel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anemia is the most common haematological complication in cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the incidence, prevalence and treatment of anemia in oncologic patients treated in Radiation Oncology Departments in Spain (ROD) and monitoring of the existing recommendations for the treatment of anemia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, prospective, multicenter study which involved 19 Spanish ROD. The study was approved by the CEIC Central Defense Hospital. 477 patients with solid tumors, subsidiary of RT with radical intent referred to such centers within a period of one month (5/5/09 to 5/6/09) and gave their consent to participate in the study. We gathered the main characteristics of patients and their oncologic disease. All patients underwent a determination of Hb levels before RT, upon reaching 25-35 Gy and at the end treatment. In patients with anemia we assessed the existence of related symptoms and its treatment.
RESULTS: Basal situation: The prevalence of anemia was 34.8% (166 patients). Mean Hb in patients with anemia was 11.17 ± 1.07 g/dl. Anemia-related symptoms were present in 34% of the patients. Anemia predisposing factors were: stage of the disease, previously received chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. 39% (66 patients) received anemia treatment, with a mean Hb of 10.43 ± 1.04 g/dl. During RT: The prevalence of anemia was 38.9% (182 patients) with a mean Hb of 11.24 ± 1.21 g/dl. Predisposing factors for anemia during RT treatment were: age, male sex, chemotherapy prior to RT, basal anemia and chemotherapy during RT. 36.3% (66 patients) had anemia-related symptoms. 34.6% (63 patients) with a mean Hb of 10.5 ± 1.37 g/dl received treatment for anemia. The prevalence of anemia at the end of the RT was 38.1% (177 patients) with a mean Hb of 11.19 ± 1.18 g/dl. The predisposing factors for the appearance of anemia at the end of RT were: male sex, anemia at basal situation and during treatment and chemotherapy during RT. 34% (61 patients) had anemia-related symptoms and 73 patients (41.2%) with a mean Hb of 10.5 ± 1.22 g/dl received treatment for anemia. The presence of anemia-related symptoms was significantly correlated with the beginning of treatment for anemia. The incidence of anemia (new cases) during radiotherapy was 17.5%.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anemia in basal situation, during RT and at the end of RT is 34.8%, 38.9% and 38.1%. During RT the incidence of anemia is 17.5%. 39.8%-41.2% of patients with anemia and 64.2%-68% of patients with anemia-related symptoms received treatment. Treatment of anemia starts with Hb<11 g/dl and the goal is to achieve Hb 12 g/dl. In our Radiotherapy Oncology Departments, the treatment of anemia complies with the current recommendations and guidelines in use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21596660     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-011-0661-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  11 in total

1.  Breast cancer trial with erythropoietin terminated unexpectedly.

Authors:  Brian Leyland-Jones
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Cancer-related anaemia management in the 21st century.

Authors:  Paolo Pronzato
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 3.  EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; M S Aapro; A Courdi; J Foubert; H Link; A Osterborg; L Repetto; P Soubeyran
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  David H Henry; Naomi V Dahl; Michael Auerbach; Simon Tchekmedyian; Leslie R Laufman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-02

Review 5.  EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; M S Aapro; A Courdi; J Foubert; H Link; A Osterborg; L Repetto; P Soubeyran
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  The European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS): a large, multinational, prospective survey defining the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Simon Van Belle; Peter Barrett-Lee; Gunnar Birgegård; Carsten Bokemeyer; Pere Gascón; Paris Kosmidis; Maciej Krzakowski; Johan Nortier; Patrizia Olmi; Maurice Schneider; Dirk Schrijvers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin Knight; Sally Wade; Lodovico Balducci
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Erythropoietin to treat head and neck cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Henke; Roland Laszig; Christian Rübe; Ulrich Schäfer; Klaus-Dieter Haase; Burkhard Schilcher; Stephan Mose; Karl T Beer; Ulrich Burger; Chris Dougherty; Hermann Frommhold
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Use of epoetin in patients with cancer: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology.

Authors:  J Douglas Rizzo; Alan E Lichtin; Steven H Woolf; Jerome Seidenfeld; Charles L Bennett; David Cella; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Matthew J Goode; Ann A Jakubowski; Stephanie J Lee; Carole B Miller; Mark U Rarick; David H Regan; George P Browman; Michael S Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.