Literature DB >> 15454245

EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer.

C Bokemeyer1, M S Aapro, A Courdi, J Foubert, H Link, A Osterborg, L Repetto, P Soubeyran.   

Abstract

Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, yet it is difficult to identify a single cause due to its multifactorial aetiology. We conducted a systematic literature review (1996-2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer (see ). Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, in patients undergoing cancer surgery and following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The Hb level at which erythropoietic protein therapy should be initiated is difficult to determine as it varied between studies; a large number of Level I studies in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease enrolled patients with a Hb concentration </=105 g/L, but none compared the effect of different baseline Hb levels on the response to treatment. Similarly, several studies defined the target Hb concentration as 120-130 g/L following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, but none specifically addressed the correlation between target Hb level and clinical benefit in a randomised fashion. Level I evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are significantly reduced with erythropoietic protein therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used to prevent cancer anaemia (approximately 20% reduction compared with controls). We found indirect Level I and III evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase (absolute increases in response rate ranged from 8% to 18%). However, none of these studies examined the effect on response rates of a longer treatment period at the lower dose, or performed a randomised comparison of a dose increase versus an unchanged dose. There is Level I evidence to show that quality-of-life (QOL) is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease, particularly in patients achieving a Hb response to erythropoietic protein therapy. There are insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week (TIW) is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. There is Level III evidence that initial doses of erythropoietic proteins considered to be higher than current standard practice produce higher haematological responses in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease. Level I evidence demonstrates that several baseline patient parameters (e.g., low endogenous erythropoietin [EPO] concentration, age <60 years, Hb concentration >/=90 g/L) impact upon the response to erythropoietic proteins when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia. Evidence indicates that endogenous EPO concentration impacts on response in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, but is not a valid parameter in patients with solid tumours. There is Level I evidence that fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used at the start of therapy to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, but maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) occurs following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or when used prophylactically in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Level I evidence supports the effectiveness of erythropoietic proteins to prevenroteins to prevent anaemia in non-anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or in those undergoing cancer surgery. However, these are non-licensed indications and we do not currently recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients who have normal Hb values at the start of treatment. Additional trials are warranted, especially on the issues of iron replacement and cost-effectiveness of erythropoietic protein therapy, as well as on tumour response/progression and survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454245     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  46 in total

1.  Editorial comment on: "The development and validation of a prediction tool for chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy". by Vincent et al.

Authors:  Wolfgang Korte
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Once-weekly dose of epoetinum alfa in cancer patients with anemia receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Pilar M Samper Ots; Aurora Rodríguez Pérez; Concepción López Carrizosa; Carmen Vallejo Ocaña; Juan de Dios Sáez Garrido; José M Delgado Pérez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Intraclass correlation metrics for the accuracy of algorithmic definitions in a computerized decision support system for supportive cancer care.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Ivo Abraham; Karen MacDonald; Pierre Soubeyran; Jan Foubert; Carsten Bokemeyer; Michael Muenzberg; Joanna Van Erps; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Physician characteristics and variability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use among Medicare patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut; Elizabeth T Wilde; Donna L Buono; Jennifer Malin; Wei Y Tsai; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  [Supportive care for malignant melanoma].

Authors:  P Mohr
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  The background and methodology of the Anaemia Cancer Treatment (A.C.T.) study: a global retrospective study of practice patterns and outcomes in the management of anaemia in cancer patients and their congruence with evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Ivo Abraham; Carsten Bokemeyer; Heinz Ludwig; Karen Macdonald; Pierre Soubeyran; Matthew Turner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Change in cycle 1 to cycle 2 haematological counts predicts toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Ann Jakubowski; Marjorie Zauderer; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Promoting evidence-based management of anemia in cancer patients: concurrent and discriminant validity of RESPOND, a web-based clinical guidance system based on the EORTC guidelines for supportive care in cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Van Erps; Matti Aapro; Karen MacDonald; Pierre Soubeyran; Matthew Turner; Hans Warrinnier; Tara Albrecht; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Use of agents stimulating erythropoiesis in digestive diseases.

Authors:  Rosario Moreno López; Beatriz Sicilia Aladrén; Fernando Gomollón García
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Janice Gabrilove; Ronald Paquette; Roger M Lyons; Chaudhry Mushtaq; Mikkael A Sekeres; Dianne Tomita; Lyndah Dreiling
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.