| Literature DB >> 21594185 |
Wolfgang Arthofer1, Dimitrios N Avtzis, Markus Riegler, Christian Stauffer.
Abstract
Phylogenetic studies based on mtDNA become increasingly questioned because of potential pitfalls due to mitochondrial pseudogenes and mitochondrial selective sweeps. While the inclusion of nuclear markers should preferentially be considered for future studies, there is no need to abandon mtDNA as long as tests for the known mtDNA artefacts are performed. In this study we presentadditionaldata and test previous phylogeographical studies of Pityogenes chalcographus. We did not detect nuclear copies (numts) of the previously used mitochondrial markers by performing a combined long range/nested PCR of the COI gene and by an in silico analysis of the COI sequence data. This confirms the robustness of our previous phylogenetic study of Pityogenes chalcographus. Results of an in-situ hybridization of Wolbachia in Pityogenes chalcographus confirm the presence of this endosysmbiont in this species. However, we did not detect a correlation between infection status, geographical region and mtDNA haplotypes. The hybridisation data also support a previous hypothesis that infections do not result from parasitoids or parasitic nematodes, insect surface or laboratory contaminations and are hence a true infection of Pityogenes chalcographus. We conclude that the deep structure found in mitochondrial populations of Pityogenes chalcographus indeed represents the evolutionary history of European populations.Entities:
Keywords: Scolytinae; Wolbachia; mtDNA; numts; phylogeny; phylogeography; pseudogenes
Year: 2010 PMID: 21594185 PMCID: PMC3088329 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.56.531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Primer sequences of Met/F and CO2/R for Pityogenes chalcographus amplifying 3463bp: alignments and GenBank accession numbers.
| Met/F | 5' | g | c | t | w | h | t | g | g | g | t | t | c | a | t | a | c | c | c | 3' | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crioceris duodecimpunctata | NC_003372 | . | . | . | a | t | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| Pyrocoelia rufa | NC_003970 | . | . | . | t | t | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| Tribolium castaneum | NC_003081 | . | . | . | a | t | . | a | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| Apis mellifera ligustica | NC_001566 | . | . | . | a | a | c | a | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| Bombyx mori | NC_002355 | . | . | . | a | t | . | . | . | . | c | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| Drosophila simulans | NC_005781 | . | . | . | a | c | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| CO2/R | 5' | c | a | a | a | t | t | t | c | t | g | a | a | c | a | t | t | g | 3' | ||
| Crioceris duodecimpunctata | NC_003372 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
| Pyrocoelia rufa | NC_003970 | . | g | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
| Tribolium castaneum | NC_003081 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
| Apis mellifera ligustica | NC_001566 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
| Bombyx mori | NC_002355 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
| Drosophila simulans | NC_005781 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | |||
In silico analysis of CO1 mutations of data presented in Avtzis et al. (2008). Total number and relative amount of mutational patterns observed in a 1557 bp stretch of n=262 individuals is compared with expected values for authentic mtDNA.
| Total | Relative (%) | Expected value for mthNA a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single base substitutions | 125 | 100.0 | - |
| 1st codon position substitutions | 15 | 12.0 | 14.9 ± 9.4% b |
| 2nd codon position substitutions | 2 | 1.6 | 4.5 ± 3.5% b |
| 3rd codon position substitutions | 108 | 86.4 | 80.6 ± 21% b |
| Nonsynonymous substitutions | 13 | 10.4 | 7.47 ± 5.4% c |
| C › T substitutions | 25 | 20.0 | - |
| GC › GT substitutions | 3 | 12.0 d | 25 ± 14.0% e |
| Insertions | 0 | 0 | none f |
| Deletions | 0 | 0 | none f |
| Additional stop-codons | 0 | 0 | none f |
| Transitions (3rd codon position) | 95 | 88.0 g | 84.9% ± 18.1% h |
| Transversions (3rd codon position) | 13 | 12.0 g | 15.1 ± 7.6% h |
| Trasition-transversion ratio | 7.31 | - | - |
| GC content | - | 34.6 | 28.66 ± 10.5% i |
a expected relative values as given in reference ± χ 2 confidence interval at α=0.05 (Sachs 1999), b Blouin et al. (1998), c Shoemaker et al. (2004), data of Drosophila subquinaria, d percentage GC › GT substitutions of total C › T substitutions, e Bulmer (1986), Bensasson et al. (2001), f Zhang and Hewitt (1996), g percentage of total transitions/transversions on 3 rd codon position, h Tamura (1992), i Lin and Danforth (2004), data for CO1 genes
Figure 1.in situ hybridization with wsp specific probe and staining with NBT/BCIP solution on uninfected A and Wolbachia infected Drosophila simulans B. An accumulation of dark color is observed only in ovarioles of Wolbachia infected Drospohila simulans. C Results of in situ hybridization of ovarial tissue excised from one Pityogenes chalcographus individual with accumulation of dark color (arrows). Three specimens were analysed. All ictures taken with 40-fold magnification.