Literature DB >> 21592579

Somatic hypermutation targeting is influenced by location within the immunoglobulin V region.

Reuma Magori Cohen1, Steven H Kleinstein, Yoram Louzoun.   

Abstract

The observed mutation pattern in immunoglobulin (Ig) V genes from peripheral B cells is influenced by several mechanisms, including the targeting of AID to specific DNA motifs, negative selection of B cells unable to express Ig receptor, and positive selection of B cells that carry affinity-increasing mutations. These influences, combined with biased codon usage, produce the well-known pattern of increased replacement mutation frequency in the CDR regions, and decreased replacement frequency in the framework regions. Through the analysis of over 12,000 mutated sequences, we show that the specific location in the V gene also significantly influences mutation accumulation. While this position-specific effect is partially explained by selection, it appears independently of the CDR/FWR structure. To further explore the specific targeting of SHM, we propose a statistical formalism describing the mutation probability of a sequence through the multiplication of independent probabilities. Using this model, we show that C→G (or G→C) mutations are almost as frequent as C→T and G→A mutations, in contrast with C→A (or G→T) mutations, which are as any other mutation. The proposed statistical framework allows us to precisely quantify the effect of V gene position, mutation substitution type, and micro-sequence specificity on the observed mutation pattern.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592579      PMCID: PMC3109224          DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Immunol        ISSN: 0161-5890            Impact factor:   4.407


  36 in total

1.  Germinal centers still hold secrets.

Authors:  Ian C M MacLennan
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 2.  Targeting of somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Valerie H Odegard; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  V-region mutation in vitro, in vivo, and in silico reveal the importance of the enzymatic properties of AID and the sequence environment.

Authors:  Thomas MacCarthy; Susan L Kalis; Sergio Roa; Phuong Pham; Myron F Goodman; Matthew D Scharff; Aviv Bergman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Man Liu; Jamie L Duke; Daniel J Richter; Carola G Vinuesa; Christopher C Goodnow; Steven H Kleinstein; David G Schatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The biochemistry of somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Jonathan U Peled; Fei Li Kuang; Maria D Iglesias-Ussel; Sergio Roa; Susan L Kalis; Myron F Goodman; Matthew D Scharff
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 28.527

6.  Ongoing somatic hypermutation of the rearranged VH but not of the V-lambda gene in EBV-transformed rheumatoid factor-producing lymphoblastoid cell line.

Authors:  Ilan Chezar; Liat Lobel-Lavi; Michael Steinitz; Reuven Laskov
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.407

7.  Taking advantage: high-affinity B cells in the germinal center have lower death rates, but similar rates of division, compared to low-affinity cells.

Authors:  Shannon M Anderson; Ashraf Khalil; Mohamed Uduman; Uri Hershberg; Yoram Louzoun; Ann M Haberman; Steven H Kleinstein; Mark J Shlomchik
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Javier M Di Noia; Michael S Neuberger
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Intricate targeting of immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation maximizes the efficiency of affinity maturation.

Authors:  Nai-Ying Zheng; Kenneth Wilson; Matthew Jared; Patrick C Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  DNA polymerase eta is the sole contributor of A/T modifications during immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in the mouse.

Authors:  Frédéric Delbos; Said Aoufouchi; Ahmad Faili; Jean-Claude Weill; Claude-Agnès Reynaud
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  10 in total

1.  The restricted DH gene reading frame usage in the expressed human antibody repertoire is selected based upon its amino acid content.

Authors:  Jennifer Benichou; Jacob Glanville; Eline T Luning Prak; Roy Azran; Tracy C Kuo; Jaume Pons; Cindy Desmarais; Lea Tsaban; Yoram Louzoun
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Position-Dependent Differential Targeting of Somatic Hypermutation.

Authors:  Julian Q Zhou; Steven H Kleinstein
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Landscape of variable domain of heavy-chain-only antibody repertoire from alpaca.

Authors:  Zhui Tu; Xiaoqiang Huang; Jinheng Fu; Na Hu; Wei Zheng; Yanping Li; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Long-lived antigen-induced IgM plasma cells demonstrate somatic mutations and contribute to long-term protection.

Authors:  Caitlin Bohannon; Ryan Powers; Lakshmipriyadarshini Satyabhama; Ang Cui; Christopher Tipton; Miri Michaeli; Ioanna Skountzou; Robert S Mittler; Steven H Kleinstein; Ramit Mehr; Frances Eun-Yun Lee; Ignacio Sanz; Joshy Jacob
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Gene-Specific Substitution Profiles Describe the Types and Frequencies of Amino Acid Changes during Antibody Somatic Hypermutation.

Authors:  Zizhang Sheng; Chaim A Schramm; Rui Kong; James C Mullikin; John R Mascola; Peter D Kwong; Lawrence Shapiro
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  The Versatility of Framework Regions of Chicken VH and VL to Mutations.

Authors:  Jung Won Shin; Sang Il Kim; Aerin Yoon; Junyeong Jin; Hyung Bae Park; Hyori Kim; Junho Chung
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.303

7.  AID Overlapping and Polη Hotspots Are Key Features of Evolutionary Variation Within the Human Antibody Heavy Chain (IGHV) Genes.

Authors:  Catherine Tang; Davide Bagnara; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Matthew D Scharff; Thomas MacCarthy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Beyond Hot Spots: Biases in Antibody Somatic Hypermutation and Implications for Vaccine Design.

Authors:  Chaim A Schramm; Daniel C Douek
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Deep learning model of somatic hypermutation reveals importance of sequence context beyond hotspot targeting.

Authors:  Catherine Tang; Artem Krantsevich; Thomas MacCarthy
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-20

10.  Models of somatic hypermutation targeting and substitution based on synonymous mutations from high-throughput immunoglobulin sequencing data.

Authors:  Gur Yaari; Jason A Vander Heiden; Mohamed Uduman; Daniel Gadala-Maria; Namita Gupta; Joel N H Stern; Kevin C O'Connor; David A Hafler; Uri Laserson; Francois Vigneault; Steven H Kleinstein
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 7.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.