Literature DB >> 21592157

A patient's perspective: the impact of adverse drug reactions on patients and their views on reporting.

S Lorimer1, A Cox, N J Langford.   

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND
OBJECTIVE: Adverse drug reactions to prescribed medication are relatively common events. However, the impact such reactions have on patients and their attitude to reporting such events have only been poorly explored. Previous studies relying on self-reporting patients indicate that altruism is an important factor. In the United Kingdom, patient reporting started in 2005; though, numbers of serious reports remain low.
METHOD: A purposive sample of fifteen patients who had been admitted to an inner city hospital with an adverse drug reaction were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Patients were asked to relate in their own words their experience of an adverse drug reaction. Patient's reactions to the information leaflet, adherence to treatment and use of other sources of information on medication were assessed. Interviews were recorded, and a thematic analysis of patients' responses was performed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Analysis of the patient interviews demonstrated the reality of being admitted to hospital is often a frightening process with a significant emotional cost. Anger, isolation, resentment and blame were common factors, particularly when medicines had been prescribed for acute conditions. For patients with chronic conditions, a more phlegmatic approach was seen especially with conditions with a strong support networks. Patients felt that communication and information should have been more readily available from the health care professional who prescribed the medication, although few had read the patient information leaflet. Only a minority of patients linked the medication they had taken to the adverse event, although some had received false reassurance that the drug was not related to their illness creating additional barriers. In contrast to previous studies, many patients felt that adverse drug reporting was not their concern, particularly as they obtained little direct benefit from it. The majority of patients were unaware of the Yellow Card Scheme in the UK for patient reporting. Even when explained, the scheme was felt too cold and impersonal and not a patient's 'job'. WHAT IS NEW AND
CONCLUSION: Patients having a severe adverse drug reaction following an acute illness felt negative emotions towards their health care provider. Those with a chronic condition rationalized the event and coped better with its impact. Neither group felt that reporting the adverse reaction was their responsibility. Encouraging patients to report remains important but expecting patients to report solely for altruistic purposes may be unrealistic.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592157     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2011.01258.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  21 in total

Review 1.  Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Linda Härmark; Shanthi Pal; Sten Olsson; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Ongoing challenges in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Gerald J Dal Pan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Adverse drug reactions: when the risk becomes a reality for patients.

Authors:  Anthony R Cox; Tehreem F Butt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Public confidence in ADR identification and their views on ADRreporting: mixed methods study.

Authors:  Narumol Jarernsiripornkul; Arunrot Patsuree; Janet Krska
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Factors affecting patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rania Al Dweik; Dawn Stacey; Dafna Kohen; Sanni Yaya
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  A plea for a more epidemiological and patient-oriented pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Veronica Scurti; Marilena Romero; Gianni Tognoni
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Effect of pharmacist involvement on patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: first Italian study.

Authors:  Roberto Leone; Ugo Moretti; Paola D'Incau; Anita Conforti; Lara Magro; Riccardo Lora; Giampaolo Velo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  A qualitative study to explore how patients identify and assess symptoms as adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Nataporn Chaipichit; Janet Krska; Thongchai Pratipanawatr; Verawan Uchaipichat; Narumol Jarernsiripornkul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  What can we learn from parents about enhancing participation in pharmacovigilance?

Authors:  Janine Arnott; Hannah Hesselgreaves; Anthony J Nunn; Matthew Peak; Munir Pirmohamed; Rosalind L Smyth; Mark A Turner; Bridget Young
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Enhancing communication about paediatric medicines: lessons from a qualitative study of parents' experiences of their child's suspected adverse drug reaction.

Authors:  Janine Arnott; Hannah Hesselgreaves; Anthony J Nunn; Matthew Peak; Munir Pirmohamed; Rosalind L Smyth; Mark A Turner; Bridget Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.