Literature DB >> 21591923

Paramedic accuracy using SALT triage after a brief initial training.

Matthew R Deluhery1, E Brooke Lerner, Ronald G Pirrallo, Richard B Schwartz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine paramedics' understanding of and accuracy using SALT (sort-assess-lifesaving interventions-treatment/transport) triage, a proposed national guideline for primary triage during mass-casualty incidents, immediately and four months after training.
METHODS: A 20-minute lecture on SALT triage was provided to all paramedics (n = 320) from a single county during mandatory continuing education. Triage concepts were reemphasized during a 10-minute small-group lecture throughout the study period as part of standard refresher training. After the initial training, all paramedics were asked to complete a posttest consisting of three general knowledge questions about SALT triage and 10 patient scenarios in which they had to assign a triage category. The same test was administered four months after the original educational session. Demographic and job experience information was also obtained. Responses were scored and matched for each paramedic and compared using paired t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 290 (91%) paramedics completed the initial posttest. They correctly answered an average (± standard deviation) of 10.7 ± 2.3 of the 13 questions (82%). For the 10 patient scenarios, they correctly triaged an average of 8.1 ± 2.0 patients. A total of 159 paramedics completed both tests. Sixty-seven percent had more than 10 years of emergency medical services (EMS) experience; 72% had prior mass-casualty drill experience; 51% had prior actual mass-casualty experience; and 23% had heard of SALT triage prior to the training. There were no statistically significant differences in initial test scores for any of these demographic groups. For those subjects who completed both tests, the mean overall score for the initial test was 10.9 ± 1.9 (84%) and for the later test was 11.0 ± 1.9 (85%) (p < 0.770; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to 0.3). For the 10 patient scenarios, the paramedics correctly triaged an average of 8.3 ± 1.7 patients on the initial test and 8.3 ± 1.4 patients on the later test (p < 0.565; 95% CI -0.4 to 0.2).
CONCLUSION: Following a short didactic course, paramedics were able to accurately perform SALT triage during a written scenario. Four months after the training, they had retained their understanding of and accuracy using SALT triage. It appears that a brief educational tool was effective for training EMS providers in SALT triage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21591923     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2011.569852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  9 in total

1.  A consensus-based gold standard for the evaluation of mass casualty triage systems.

Authors:  E Brooke Lerner; Courtney H McKee; Charles E Cady; David C Cone; M Riccardo Colella; Arthur Cooper; Phillip L Coule; Julio R Lairet; J Marc Liu; Ronald G Pirrallo; Scott M Sasser; Richard Schwartz; Greene Shepherd; Raymond E Swienton
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Triage performance of Swedish physicians using the ATLS algorithm in a simulated mass casualty incident: a prospective cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Maria Lampi; Tore Vikström; Carl-Oscar Jonson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Improved and sustained triage skills in firemen after a short training intervention.

Authors:  Abraham Nilsson; Kristian Åslund; Maria Lampi; Helene Nilsson; Carl-Oscar Jonson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Pre-hospital triage performance after standardized trauma courses.

Authors:  Maria Lampi; Johan Junker; Peter Berggren; Carl-Oscar Jonson; Tore Vikström
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Primary mass casualty incident triage: evidence for the benefit of yearly brief re-training from a simulation study.

Authors:  Michael S Dittmar; Philipp Wolf; Marc Bigalke; Bernhard M Graf; Torsten Birkholz
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  60 Seconds to Survival: A Multisite Study of a Screen-based Simulation to Improve Prehospital Providers Disaster Triage Skills.

Authors:  Mark X Cicero; Travis Whitfill; Barbara Walsh; Maria Carmen Diaz; Grace Arteaga; Daniel J Scherzer; Scott Goldberg; Manu Madhok; Angela Bowen; Geno Paesano; Michael Redlener; Kevin Munjal; David Kessler; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Knowledge about health effects of cigarette smoking and quitting among Italian university students: the importance of teaching nicotine dependence and treatment in the medical curriculum.

Authors:  Maria Caterina Grassi; Massimo Baraldo; Christian Chiamulera; Franco Culasso; Tobias Raupach; Amy K Ferketich; Carlo Patrono; Paolo Nencini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  A study on the disaster medical response during the Mauna Ocean Resort gymnasium collapse.

Authors:  Myeong-Il Cha; Gi Woon Kim; Chu Hyun Kim; Minhong Choa; Dai Hai Choi; Inbyung Kim; Soon Joo Wang; In Sool Yoo; Han Deok Yoon; Kang Hyun Lee; Suck Ju Cho; Tag Heo; Eun Seog Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-30

9.  Comparison of prehospital professional accuracy, speed, and interrater reliability of six pediatric triage algorithms.

Authors:  Tabitha Cheng; Katherine Staats; Amy H Kaji; Nicole D'Arcy; Kian Niknam; J Joelle Donofrio-Odmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.