OBJECTIVE: To determine paramedics' understanding of and accuracy using SALT (sort-assess-lifesaving interventions-treatment/transport) triage, a proposed national guideline for primary triage during mass-casualty incidents, immediately and four months after training. METHODS: A 20-minute lecture on SALT triage was provided to all paramedics (n = 320) from a single county during mandatory continuing education. Triage concepts were reemphasized during a 10-minute small-group lecture throughout the study period as part of standard refresher training. After the initial training, all paramedics were asked to complete a posttest consisting of three general knowledge questions about SALT triage and 10 patient scenarios in which they had to assign a triage category. The same test was administered four months after the original educational session. Demographic and job experience information was also obtained. Responses were scored and matched for each paramedic and compared using paired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 290 (91%) paramedics completed the initial posttest. They correctly answered an average (± standard deviation) of 10.7 ± 2.3 of the 13 questions (82%). For the 10 patient scenarios, they correctly triaged an average of 8.1 ± 2.0 patients. A total of 159 paramedics completed both tests. Sixty-seven percent had more than 10 years of emergency medical services (EMS) experience; 72% had prior mass-casualty drill experience; 51% had prior actual mass-casualty experience; and 23% had heard of SALT triage prior to the training. There were no statistically significant differences in initial test scores for any of these demographic groups. For those subjects who completed both tests, the mean overall score for the initial test was 10.9 ± 1.9 (84%) and for the later test was 11.0 ± 1.9 (85%) (p < 0.770; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to 0.3). For the 10 patient scenarios, the paramedics correctly triaged an average of 8.3 ± 1.7 patients on the initial test and 8.3 ± 1.4 patients on the later test (p < 0.565; 95% CI -0.4 to 0.2). CONCLUSION: Following a short didactic course, paramedics were able to accurately perform SALT triage during a written scenario. Four months after the training, they had retained their understanding of and accuracy using SALT triage. It appears that a brief educational tool was effective for training EMS providers in SALT triage.
OBJECTIVE: To determine paramedics' understanding of and accuracy using SALT (sort-assess-lifesaving interventions-treatment/transport) triage, a proposed national guideline for primary triage during mass-casualty incidents, immediately and four months after training. METHODS: A 20-minute lecture on SALT triage was provided to all paramedics (n = 320) from a single county during mandatory continuing education. Triage concepts were reemphasized during a 10-minute small-group lecture throughout the study period as part of standard refresher training. After the initial training, all paramedics were asked to complete a posttest consisting of three general knowledge questions about SALT triage and 10 patient scenarios in which they had to assign a triage category. The same test was administered four months after the original educational session. Demographic and job experience information was also obtained. Responses were scored and matched for each paramedic and compared using paired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 290 (91%) paramedics completed the initial posttest. They correctly answered an average (± standard deviation) of 10.7 ± 2.3 of the 13 questions (82%). For the 10 patient scenarios, they correctly triaged an average of 8.1 ± 2.0 patients. A total of 159 paramedics completed both tests. Sixty-seven percent had more than 10 years of emergency medical services (EMS) experience; 72% had prior mass-casualty drill experience; 51% had prior actual mass-casualty experience; and 23% had heard of SALT triage prior to the training. There were no statistically significant differences in initial test scores for any of these demographic groups. For those subjects who completed both tests, the mean overall score for the initial test was 10.9 ± 1.9 (84%) and for the later test was 11.0 ± 1.9 (85%) (p < 0.770; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to 0.3). For the 10 patient scenarios, the paramedics correctly triaged an average of 8.3 ± 1.7 patients on the initial test and 8.3 ± 1.4 patients on the later test (p < 0.565; 95% CI -0.4 to 0.2). CONCLUSION: Following a short didactic course, paramedics were able to accurately perform SALT triage during a written scenario. Four months after the training, they had retained their understanding of and accuracy using SALT triage. It appears that a brief educational tool was effective for training EMS providers in SALT triage.
Authors: E Brooke Lerner; Courtney H McKee; Charles E Cady; David C Cone; M Riccardo Colella; Arthur Cooper; Phillip L Coule; Julio R Lairet; J Marc Liu; Ronald G Pirrallo; Scott M Sasser; Richard Schwartz; Greene Shepherd; Raymond E Swienton Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Abraham Nilsson; Kristian Åslund; Maria Lampi; Helene Nilsson; Carl-Oscar Jonson Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Michael S Dittmar; Philipp Wolf; Marc Bigalke; Bernhard M Graf; Torsten Birkholz Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Mark X Cicero; Travis Whitfill; Barbara Walsh; Maria Carmen Diaz; Grace Arteaga; Daniel J Scherzer; Scott Goldberg; Manu Madhok; Angela Bowen; Geno Paesano; Michael Redlener; Kevin Munjal; David Kessler; Marc Auerbach Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2018-01-31
Authors: Maria Caterina Grassi; Massimo Baraldo; Christian Chiamulera; Franco Culasso; Tobias Raupach; Amy K Ferketich; Carlo Patrono; Paolo Nencini Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-04-06 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Myeong-Il Cha; Gi Woon Kim; Chu Hyun Kim; Minhong Choa; Dai Hai Choi; Inbyung Kim; Soon Joo Wang; In Sool Yoo; Han Deok Yoon; Kang Hyun Lee; Suck Ju Cho; Tag Heo; Eun Seog Hong Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2016-09-30