Literature DB >> 21591754

Bird mercury concentrations change rapidly as chicks age: toxicological risk is highest at hatching and fledging.

Joshua T Ackerman1, Collin A Eagles-Smith, Mark P Herzog.   

Abstract

Toxicological risk of methylmercury exposure to juvenile birds is complex due to the highly transient nature of mercury concentrations as chicks age. We examined total mercury and methylmercury concentrations in blood, liver, kidney, muscle, and feathers of 111 Forster's tern (Sterna forsteri), 69 black-necked stilt (Himantopus mexicanus), and 43 American avocet (Recurvirostra americana) chicks as they aged from hatching through postfledging at wetlands that had either low or high mercury contamination in San Francisco Bay, California. For each waterbird species, internal tissue, and wetland, total mercury and methylmercury concentrations changed rapidly as chicks aged and exhibited a quadratic, U-shaped pattern from hatching through postfledging. Mercury concentrations were highest immediately after hatching, due to maternally deposited mercury in eggs, then rapidly declined as chicks aged and diluted their mercury body burden through growth in size and mercury depuration into growing feathers. Mercury concentrations then increased during fledging when mass gain and feather growth slowed, while chicks continued to acquire dietary mercury. In contrast to mercury in internal tissues, mercury concentrations in chick feathers were highly variable and declined linearly with age. For 58 recaptured Forster's tern chicks, the proportional change in blood mercury concentration was negatively related to the proportional change in body mass, but not to the amount of feathers or wing length. Thus, mercury concentrations declined more in chicks that gained more mass between sampling events. The U-shaped pattern of mercury concentrations from hatching to fledging indicates that juvenile birds may be at highest risk to methylmercury toxicity shortly after hatching when maternally deposited mercury concentrations are still high and again after fledging when opportunities for mass dilution and mercury excretion into feathers are limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21591754     DOI: 10.1021/es200647g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Foraging and fasting can influence contaminant concentrations in animals: an example with mercury contamination in a free-ranging marine mammal.

Authors:  Sarah H Peterson; Joshua T Ackerman; Daniel E Crocker; Daniel P Costa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Marine foraging ecology influences mercury bioaccumulation in deep-diving northern elephant seals.

Authors:  Sarah H Peterson; Joshua T Ackerman; Daniel P Costa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mercury exposure of a wetland songbird, Agelaius phoeniceus, in the New York metropolitan area and its effect on nestling growth rate.

Authors:  Allisyn-Marie Tsz Yan Gillet; Chad L Seewagen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: A synthesis.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Mark P Herzog; C Alex Hartman; Sarah H Peterson; David C Evers; Allyson K Jackson; John E Elliott; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Unintended consequences of management actions in salt pond restoration: cascading effects in trophic interactions.

Authors:  John Y Takekawa; Joshua T Ackerman; L Arriana Brand; Tanya R Graham; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Mark P Herzog; Brent R Topping; Gregory G Shellenbarger; James S Kuwabara; Eric Mruz; Sara L Piotter; Nicole D Athearn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Foraging Ecology Differentiates Life Stages and Mercury Exposure in Common Terns (Sterna hirundo).

Authors:  Annie M Bracey; Matthew A Etterson; Frederick C Strand; Sumner W Matteson; Gerald J Niemi; Francesca J Cuthbert; Joel C Hoffman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Modulators of mercury risk to wildlife and humans in the context of rapid global change.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; Ellen K Silbergeld; Niladri Basu; Paco Bustamante; Fernando Diaz-Barriga; William A Hopkins; Karen A Kidd; Jennifer F Nyland
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.