Literature DB >> 21590796

Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.

E Spencer Williams1, Jason P Berninger, Bryan W Brooks.   

Abstract

The European Union's REACH regulation has further highlighted the lack of ecotoxicological data for substances in the marketplace. The mandates under REACH (registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of chemicals) to produce data and minimize testing on vertebrates present an impetus for advanced hazard assessment techniques using read-across. Research in our group has recently focused on probabilistic ecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches using chemical toxicity distributions (CTDs). Using available data for chemicals with similar modes of action or within a chemical class may allow for selection of a screening point value (SPV) for development of environmental safety values, based on a probabilistic distribution of toxicity values for a specific endpoint in an ecological receptor. Ecotoxicity data for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and surfactants in Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas were gathered from several data sources, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ECOTOX and Pesticides Ecotoxicity databases, the peer-reviewed literature, and the Human and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) project. Chemical toxicity distributions were subsequently developed, and the first and fifth centiles were used as SPVs for the development of screening-predicted no-effect concentrations (sPNECs). The first and fifth centiles of these distributions were divided by an assessment factor of 1,000, as recommended by REACH guidance. Use of screening values created using these techniques could support the processes of data dossier development and environmental exposure assessment, allowing for rigorous prioritization in testing and monitoring to fill data gaps.
Copyright © 2011 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590796     DOI: 10.1002/etc.583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Comparative pharmacology and toxicology of pharmaceuticals in the environment: diphenhydramine protection of diazinon toxicity in Danio rerio but not Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Lauren A Kristofco; Bowen Du; C Kevin Chambliss; Jason P Berninger; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  The ECOTOXicology Knowledgebase: A Curated Database of Ecologically Relevant Toxicity Tests to Support Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jennifer H Olker; Colleen M Elonen; Anne Pilli; Arne Anderson; Brian Kinziger; Stephen Erickson; Michael Skopinski; Anita Pomplun; Carlie A LaLone; Christine L Russom; Dale Hoff
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.218

3.  Use of the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach to Derive Ecological Threshold of Toxicological Concern (eco-TTC) for Pesticides.

Authors:  Cristiana Rizzi; Sara Villa; Alessandro Sergio Cuzzeri; Antonio Finizio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Ecological Thresholds of Toxicological Concern: A Review.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Ryan R Otter; Kristin A Connors; Aude Kienzler; Michelle R Embry
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-05

5.  Same sensitivity with shorter exposure: behavior as an appropriate parameter to assess metal toxicity.

Authors:  Álvaro Alonso; Alberto Romero-Blanco
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.935

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.