Literature DB >> 21590262

Integration of vestibular and proprioceptive signals for spatial updating.

Ilja Frissen1, Jennifer L Campos, Jan L Souman, Marc O Ernst.   

Abstract

Spatial updating during self-motion typically involves the appropriate integration of both visual and non-visual cues, including vestibular and proprioceptive information. Here, we investigated how human observers combine these two non-visual cues during full-stride curvilinear walking. To obtain a continuous, real-time estimate of perceived position, observers were asked to continuously point toward a previously viewed target in the absence of vision. They did so while moving on a large circular treadmill under various movement conditions. Two conditions were designed to evaluate spatial updating when information was largely limited to either proprioceptive information (walking in place) or vestibular information (passive movement). A third condition evaluated updating when both sources of information were available (walking through space) and were either congruent or in conflict. During both the passive movement condition and while walking through space, the pattern of pointing behavior demonstrated evidence of accurate egocentric updating. In contrast, when walking in place, perceived self-motion was underestimated and participants always adjusted the pointer at a constant rate, irrespective of changes in the rate at which the participant moved relative to the target. The results are discussed in relation to the maximum likelihood estimation model of sensory integration. They show that when the two cues were congruent, estimates were combined, such that the variance of the adjustments was generally reduced. Results also suggest that when conflicts were introduced between the vestibular and proprioceptive cues, spatial updating was based on a weighted average of the two inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21590262     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2717-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self-motion.

Authors:  L R Harris; M Jenkin; D C Zikovitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length.

Authors:  M L Mittelstaedt; H Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.

Authors:  J J Rieser; D H Ashmead; C R Talor; G A Youngquist
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Patrick O Riley; Gabriele Paolini; Ugo Della Croce; Kate W Paylo; D Casey Kerrigan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Johannes Burge; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking.

Authors:  F. Alton; L. Baldey; S. Caplan; M.C. Morrissey
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading.

Authors:  John S Butler; Stuart T Smith; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored?

Authors:  A Berthoz; I Israël; P Georges-François; R Grasso; T Tsuzuku
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  31 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multimodal integration of self-motion cues in the vestibular system: active versus passive translations.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Integration of canal and otolith inputs by central vestibular neurons is subadditive for both active and passive self-motion: implication for perception.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reliability and relative weighting of visual and nonvisual information for perceiving direction of self-motion during walking.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Dependence of auditory spatial updating on vestibular, proprioceptive, and efference copy signals.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Wiegrebe; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Our sense of direction: progress, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Assessing the relative contribution of vision to odometry via manipulations of gait in an over-ground homing task.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Nicholas Reynolds; Brandon Bishoff; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.