Literature DB >> 21589087

2-Methyl-benzimidazolium thio-cyanate.

Shayma A Shaker1, Hamid Khaledi, Hapipah Mohd Ali.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(8)H(9)N(2) (+)·SCN(-), the nearly planar 2-methyl-benzimidazolium cation [r.m.s. deviation = 0.0123 (4) Å] is perpendicular to a mirror plane and the methyl H atoms are disordered about the mirror plane with equal occupancies. The thio-cyanate anion also lies on a mirror plane. N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the components into an infinite chain along the b axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21589087      PMCID: PMC3009281          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810042145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Bhattacharya et al. (2004 ▶); Ding et al. (2004 ▶); Shaker et al. (2010 ▶); Huang et al. (2006 ▶). For the application of benzimidazole derivatives in crystal engineering, see: Cai et al. (2002 ▶). For the biological properties of benzimidazole derivatives, see: Refaat (2010 ▶); Ansari & Lal (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H9N2 +·SCN M = 191.25 Orthorhombic, a = 9.879 (2) Å b = 7.2157 (15) Å c = 12.890 (3) Å V = 918.9 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.31 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.40 × 0.29 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.888, T max = 0.956 10495 measured reflections 1133 independent reflections 1000 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.039

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034 wR(F 2) = 0.090 S = 1.01 1133 reflections 71 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810042145/is2616sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810042145/is2616Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H9N2+·SCNF(000) = 400
Mr = 191.25Dx = 1.382 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 4285 reflections
a = 9.879 (2) Åθ = 2.6–30.3°
b = 7.2157 (15) ŵ = 0.31 mm1
c = 12.890 (3) ÅT = 100 K
V = 918.9 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.40 × 0.29 × 0.15 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1133 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1000 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.039
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.888, Tmax = 0.956k = −9→9
10495 measured reflectionsl = −16→16
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.090H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0395P)2 + 0.9286P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1133 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
71 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
S1−0.11964 (6)0.25000.31732 (5)0.02094 (18)
N10.15210 (19)0.25000.37930 (15)0.0193 (4)
C10.0383 (2)0.25000.35335 (17)0.0162 (4)
H20.2584 (17)0.485 (2)0.3813 (13)0.019*
N20.28838 (12)0.60009 (17)0.38143 (10)0.0155 (3)
C20.0609 (2)0.75000.38575 (17)0.0191 (5)
H2A0.02770.87790.38250.029*0.50
H2B0.02990.69220.45030.029*0.50
H2BA0.02580.68000.32640.029*0.50
C30.2103 (2)0.75000.38283 (15)0.0156 (4)
C40.42343 (15)0.6534 (2)0.37939 (11)0.0148 (3)
C50.54317 (15)0.5525 (2)0.37848 (11)0.0179 (3)
H50.54320.42090.37740.022*
C60.66199 (15)0.6529 (2)0.37921 (11)0.0189 (3)
H60.74600.58870.37970.023*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0159 (3)0.0182 (3)0.0287 (3)0.000−0.0020 (2)0.000
N10.0179 (9)0.0140 (9)0.0260 (10)0.0000.0024 (7)0.000
C10.0200 (10)0.0105 (9)0.0182 (10)0.0000.0034 (8)0.000
N20.0169 (6)0.0104 (6)0.0191 (6)−0.0018 (5)0.0000 (5)0.0004 (5)
C20.0170 (10)0.0192 (11)0.0211 (11)0.0000.0015 (8)0.000
C30.0193 (10)0.0151 (10)0.0126 (9)0.000−0.0012 (8)0.000
C40.0168 (7)0.0141 (7)0.0135 (6)−0.0007 (6)−0.0004 (5)0.0004 (5)
C50.0215 (7)0.0126 (7)0.0197 (7)0.0023 (6)−0.0015 (6)−0.0003 (6)
C60.0175 (7)0.0200 (8)0.0193 (7)0.0026 (6)−0.0007 (6)0.0001 (6)
S1—C11.628 (2)C2—H2BA0.9800
N1—C11.173 (3)C4—C51.389 (2)
N2—C31.3289 (18)C4—C4i1.394 (3)
N2—C41.3888 (19)C5—C61.379 (2)
N2—H20.881 (15)C5—H50.9500
C2—C31.477 (3)C6—C6i1.401 (3)
C2—H2A0.9800C6—H60.9500
C2—H2B0.9800
N1—C1—S1180.0 (2)N2—C3—C2125.52 (9)
C3—N2—C4109.44 (13)N2—C4—C5132.32 (14)
C3—N2—H2124.8 (12)N2—C4—C4i106.08 (8)
C4—N2—H2125.7 (12)C5—C4—C4i121.60 (9)
C3—C2—H2A109.5C6—C5—C4116.72 (15)
C3—C2—H2B109.5C6—C5—H5121.6
H2A—C2—H2B109.5C4—C5—H5121.6
C3—C2—H2BA109.5C5—C6—C6i121.67 (9)
H2A—C2—H2BA109.5C5—C6—H6119.2
H2B—C2—H2BA109.5C6i—C6—H6119.2
N2—C3—N2i108.97 (18)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···N10.88 (2)2.00 (2)2.8627 (16)168 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯N10.88 (2)2.00 (2)2.8627 (16)168 (2)
  4 in total

1.  Synthesis and anticancer activity of some novel 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives.

Authors:  Hanan M Refaat
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The mononuclear cobalt(II) complex CoII(DMBDIZ)2(NCS)2, where DMBDIZ is 2,6-dimethylbenzo[1,2-d:4,5-d']diimidazole.

Authors:  Chen-Xin Cai; Yun-Qi Tian; Yi-Zhi Li; Xiao-Zeng You
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  2-Methyl-benzimidazolium thio-cyanate-2-methyl-benzimidazole (1/1).

Authors:  Shayma A Shaker; Hamid Khaledi; Hapipah Mohd Ali
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.