Literature DB >> 21588331

4-Chloro-2,5-dimethyl-quinoline.

K Prabha, K N Vennila, K J Rajendra Prasad, D Velmurugan.   

Abstract

Mol-ecules of the title compound, C(11)H(10)ClN, are essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.009 Å) and are stacked along the a axis with the centroids of the benzene and pyridine rings alternately separated by 3.649 (1) and 3.778 (1) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588331      PMCID: PMC3007505          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810025419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of quinoline derivatives, see: Miyamoto et al. (1995 ▶); Milner et al. (2010 ▶); Li et al. (2008 ▶); Musiola et al. (2006 ▶); Muthumani et al. (2010 ▶). For related chloro­quinoline structures, see: Rizvi et al. (2008 ▶); Bureau et al. (1999 ▶); de Souza et al. (2010 ▶); Yathirajan et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H10ClN M = 190.66 Monoclinic, a = 6.9534 (9) Å b = 13.0762 (14) Å c = 10.4306 (11) Å β = 99.239 (8)° V = 936.09 (19) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.27 × 0.26 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.909, T max = 0.925 8798 measured reflections 2345 independent reflections 1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.027

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.050 wR(F 2) = 0.147 S = 1.05 2345 reflections 120 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810025419/ci5114sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810025419/ci5114Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H10ClNF(000) = 400
Mr = 190.66Dx = 1.353 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2345 reflections
a = 6.9534 (9) Åθ = 2.5–28.5°
b = 13.0762 (14) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 10.4306 (11) ÅT = 293 K
β = 99.239 (8)°Block, colourless
V = 936.09 (19) Å30.27 × 0.26 × 0.22 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEXII area-detector diffractometer2345 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.027
ω and φ scansθmax = 28.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.909, Tmax = 0.925k = −17→12
8798 measured reflectionsl = −13→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.147H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0468P)2 + 0.6973P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2345 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.007
120 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.27505 (13)0.22264 (5)0.06695 (7)0.0680 (3)
N10.2186 (3)−0.08447 (15)−0.13203 (18)0.0455 (5)
C50.2644 (3)0.01002 (16)0.0758 (2)0.0372 (5)
C80.2282 (4)0.09687 (19)−0.1312 (2)0.0461 (6)
H80.22180.1571−0.17910.055*
C90.2550 (4)0.10065 (17)0.0003 (2)0.0410 (5)
C10.2513 (4)−0.17776 (18)0.0632 (2)0.0485 (6)
H10.2379−0.23740.01400.058*
C60.2455 (3)−0.08204 (17)0.0005 (2)0.0383 (5)
C30.2963 (4)−0.0945 (2)0.2683 (2)0.0504 (6)
H30.3140−0.10020.35830.060*
C100.1806 (5)−0.0015 (2)−0.3412 (2)0.0622 (8)
H10A0.1524−0.0705−0.36970.093*
H10B0.29690.0213−0.37120.093*
H10C0.07380.0420−0.37600.093*
C40.2913 (4)0.00173 (18)0.2147 (2)0.0426 (5)
C70.2103 (4)0.00246 (19)−0.1951 (2)0.0443 (6)
C110.3095 (5)0.0919 (2)0.3066 (2)0.0629 (8)
H11A0.32890.06770.39460.094*
H11B0.19260.13210.29050.094*
H11C0.41860.13320.29310.094*
C20.2761 (4)−0.18365 (19)0.1949 (2)0.0529 (7)
H20.2796−0.24700.23560.064*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.1124 (7)0.0347 (3)0.0570 (4)−0.0066 (4)0.0141 (4)−0.0037 (3)
N10.0560 (13)0.0426 (11)0.0382 (10)0.0017 (9)0.0092 (9)−0.0031 (8)
C50.0383 (12)0.0372 (11)0.0365 (11)0.0000 (10)0.0076 (9)−0.0003 (9)
C80.0556 (16)0.0430 (13)0.0403 (13)−0.0010 (11)0.0094 (11)0.0077 (10)
C90.0480 (14)0.0338 (11)0.0417 (12)−0.0024 (10)0.0082 (10)−0.0006 (9)
C10.0601 (17)0.0341 (11)0.0520 (14)0.0037 (11)0.0106 (12)0.0004 (10)
C60.0406 (13)0.0375 (11)0.0370 (11)0.0026 (9)0.0068 (9)−0.0004 (9)
C30.0599 (16)0.0566 (15)0.0349 (12)0.0031 (13)0.0086 (11)0.0099 (11)
C100.077 (2)0.0737 (19)0.0356 (13)−0.0033 (16)0.0085 (13)0.0012 (12)
C40.0484 (14)0.0439 (12)0.0360 (12)−0.0023 (10)0.0085 (10)−0.0012 (9)
C70.0497 (15)0.0483 (13)0.0349 (12)−0.0005 (11)0.0070 (10)0.0008 (10)
C110.094 (2)0.0591 (16)0.0353 (13)−0.0126 (15)0.0096 (13)−0.0094 (12)
C20.0654 (18)0.0398 (12)0.0545 (15)0.0082 (12)0.0121 (13)0.0137 (11)
Cl1—C91.737 (2)C3—C41.374 (3)
N1—C71.310 (3)C3—C21.390 (4)
N1—C61.366 (3)C3—H30.93
C5—C91.419 (3)C10—C71.506 (3)
C5—C61.432 (3)C10—H10A0.96
C5—C41.435 (3)C10—H10B0.96
C8—C91.356 (3)C10—H10C0.96
C8—C71.399 (3)C4—C111.512 (3)
C8—H80.93C11—H11A0.96
C1—C21.358 (3)C11—H11B0.96
C1—C61.410 (3)C11—H11C0.96
C1—H10.93C2—H20.93
C7—N1—C6118.4 (2)C7—C10—H10B109.5
C9—C5—C6114.0 (2)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C9—C5—C4127.6 (2)C7—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4118.4 (2)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C8—C7120.1 (2)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C9—C8—H8120.0C3—C4—C5118.0 (2)
C7—C8—H8120.0C3—C4—C11117.5 (2)
C8—C9—C5121.2 (2)C5—C4—C11124.4 (2)
C8—C9—Cl1115.32 (18)N1—C7—C8122.2 (2)
C5—C9—Cl1123.49 (18)N1—C7—C10117.8 (2)
C2—C1—C6120.6 (2)C8—C7—C10120.0 (2)
C2—C1—H1119.7C4—C11—H11A109.5
C6—C1—H1119.7C4—C11—H11B109.5
N1—C6—C1116.0 (2)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
N1—C6—C5124.1 (2)C4—C11—H11C109.5
C1—C6—C5119.9 (2)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C4—C3—C2123.4 (2)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C4—C3—H3118.3C1—C2—C3119.6 (2)
C2—C3—H3118.3C1—C2—H2120.2
C7—C10—H10A109.5C3—C2—H2120.2
C7—C8—C9—C5−0.3 (4)C4—C5—C6—C10.8 (3)
C7—C8—C9—Cl1180.0 (2)C2—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (4)
C6—C5—C9—C80.7 (3)C2—C3—C4—C11178.3 (3)
C4—C5—C9—C8−179.8 (2)C9—C5—C4—C3−179.9 (2)
C6—C5—C9—Cl1−179.65 (18)C6—C5—C4—C3−0.4 (3)
C4—C5—C9—Cl1−0.1 (4)C9—C5—C4—C111.7 (4)
C7—N1—C6—C1179.4 (2)C6—C5—C4—C11−178.8 (2)
C7—N1—C6—C50.4 (3)C6—N1—C7—C80.1 (4)
C2—C1—C6—N1−179.6 (2)C6—N1—C7—C10180.0 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.5 (4)C9—C8—C7—N1−0.1 (4)
C9—C5—C6—N1−0.7 (3)C9—C8—C7—C10−180.0 (2)
C4—C5—C6—N1179.7 (2)C6—C1—C2—C3−0.1 (4)
C9—C5—C6—C1−179.7 (2)C4—C3—C2—C10.5 (4)
  8 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Novel chalcones derived from 2-chloro-3-formyl-6-methylquinoline.

Authors:  Umar Farooq Rizvi; Hamid Latif Siddiqui; Saeed Ahmad; Matloob Ahmad; Masood Parvez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Identification of quinolines that inhibit melanogenesis by altering tyrosinase family trafficking.

Authors:  Li Ni-Komatsu; Chunxiang Tong; Guangming Chen; Nelya Brindzei; Seth J Orlow
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Synthesis and biological properties of substituted 1,4-dihydro-5-methyl-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acids.

Authors:  H Miyamoto; H Yamashita; H Ueda; H Tamaoka; K Ohmori; K Nakagawa
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Antifungal properties of new series of quinoline derivatives.

Authors:  Robert Musiol; Josef Jampilek; Vladimir Buchta; Luis Silva; Halina Niedbala; Barbara Podeszwa; Anna Palka; Katarzyna Majerz-Maniecka; Barbara Oleksyn; Jaroslaw Polanski
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Anti-malarial activity of a non-piperidine library of next-generation quinoline methanols.

Authors:  Erin Milner; William McCalmont; Jayendra Bhonsle; Diana Caridha; Jose Cobar; Sean Gardner; Lucia Gerena; Duane Goodine; Charlotte Lanteri; Victor Melendez; Norma Roncal; Jason Sousa; Peter Wipf; Geoffrey Stuart Dow
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  7-Chloro-4-[(E)-2-(2-methoxy-benzyl-idene)hydrazin-1-yl]quinoline monohydrate.

Authors:  Marcus V N de Souza; R Alan Howie; Edward R T Tiekink; James L Wardell; Solange M S V Wardell; Carlos R Kaiser
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-02-27

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.