Literature DB >> 21588239

2-Isopropyl-3-methyl-quinoxaline 1,4-dioxide.

Jian-Ye Li, Tao Sun, Ai-You Hao, Hongwei Qiao, Feifei Xin.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(12)H(14)N(2)O(2), the quinoxaline ring system and the C atoms of the methylene and methyl substituents lie on a mirror plane. The crystal packing is stabilized by weak π-π inter-actions [centroid-centroid distance = 3.680 (7) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588239      PMCID: PMC3007200          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810023706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the preparation, see: Issidorides & Haddadin (1966 ▶). For the biological activity of quinoxaline di-N-oxide compounds, see: Amin et al. (2006 ▶); Edwards et al. (1975 ▶); Glazer & Chappel (1982 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H14N2O2 M = 218.25 Orthorhombic, a = 13.3879 (10) Å b = 6.8462 (6) Å c = 11.8861 (9) Å V = 1089.44 (15) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.29 × 0.27 × 0.26 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.651, T max = 0.745 10376 measured reflections 1446 independent reflections 1062 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.019

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.057 wR(F 2) = 0.203 S = 1.17 1446 reflections 96 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810023706/jh2164sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810023706/jh2164Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H14N2O2Dx = 1.331 Mg m3
Mr = 218.25Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PnmaCell parameters from 4638 reflections
a = 13.3879 (10) Åθ = 3.0–27.9°
b = 6.8462 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 11.8861 (9) ÅT = 296 K
V = 1089.44 (15) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.29 × 0.27 × 0.26 mm
F(000) = 464
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1446 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1062 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.019
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.6°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005)h = −18→17
Tmin = 0.651, Tmax = 0.745k = −9→9
10376 measured reflectionsl = −16→16
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.203w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0863P)2 + 0.4481P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.17(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1446 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
96 parametersΔρmin = −0.35 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.011 (4)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.9509 (2)0.25001.1853 (3)0.0603 (8)
H110.90260.25001.24160.072*
C21.0499 (3)0.25001.2128 (4)0.0731 (10)
H21.06890.25001.28800.088*
C31.1212 (2)0.25001.1306 (4)0.0723 (11)
H31.18830.25001.15100.087*
C41.0962 (2)0.25001.0186 (4)0.0641 (9)
H41.14540.25000.96330.077*
C50.99369 (19)0.25000.9893 (2)0.0449 (6)
C60.92245 (18)0.25001.0730 (2)0.0440 (6)
C70.79331 (18)0.25000.9352 (2)0.0427 (6)
C80.8664 (2)0.25000.8500 (2)0.0481 (6)
C90.8419 (3)0.25000.7287 (3)0.0705 (9)
H9A0.90230.25000.68450.080*
H9B0.80340.13550.70990.080*
C100.6836 (2)0.25000.9063 (3)0.0551 (7)
H100.67980.25000.82400.066*
C110.63084 (17)0.0655 (4)0.9452 (2)0.0777 (8)
H11A0.6657−0.04680.91690.117*
H11B0.56360.06520.91730.117*
H11C0.62990.06151.02590.117*
N10.82094 (15)0.25001.04424 (19)0.0445 (6)
N20.96482 (17)0.25000.8772 (2)0.0513 (6)
O10.75580 (15)0.25001.12490 (18)0.0681 (7)
O21.03357 (18)0.25000.8002 (2)0.0809 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0617 (17)0.0652 (18)0.0539 (18)0.000−0.0125 (14)0.000
C20.067 (2)0.066 (2)0.085 (3)0.000−0.0309 (19)0.000
C30.0494 (16)0.0531 (16)0.114 (3)0.000−0.0284 (19)0.000
C40.0403 (13)0.0433 (14)0.109 (3)0.0000.0089 (16)0.000
C50.0405 (12)0.0326 (11)0.0616 (17)0.0000.0047 (11)0.000
C60.0389 (12)0.0377 (12)0.0553 (15)0.000−0.0038 (11)0.000
C70.0408 (12)0.0438 (12)0.0434 (14)0.000−0.0006 (10)0.000
C80.0557 (14)0.0409 (12)0.0477 (15)0.0000.0076 (12)0.000
C90.084 (2)0.081 (2)0.0466 (17)0.0000.0075 (16)0.000
C100.0409 (13)0.0706 (18)0.0537 (17)0.000−0.0040 (12)0.000
C110.0525 (11)0.0818 (17)0.099 (2)−0.0170 (11)−0.0097 (12)0.0027 (15)
N10.0368 (10)0.0509 (12)0.0457 (12)0.0000.0050 (9)0.000
N20.0485 (12)0.0406 (11)0.0648 (15)0.0000.0196 (11)0.000
O10.0461 (10)0.1067 (18)0.0516 (12)0.0000.0126 (9)0.000
O20.0716 (15)0.0876 (17)0.0836 (18)0.0000.0422 (13)0.000
C1—C21.365 (4)C7—C101.508 (4)
C1—C61.389 (4)C8—N21.357 (4)
C1—H110.9300C8—C91.479 (4)
C2—C31.366 (6)C9—H9A0.964 (4)
C2—H20.9300C9—H9B0.964 (2)
C3—C41.373 (5)C10—C11i1.519 (3)
C3—H30.9300C10—C111.519 (3)
C4—C51.416 (4)C10—H100.9800
C4—H40.9300C11—H11A0.9600
C5—C61.378 (4)C11—H11B0.9600
C5—N21.387 (4)C11—H11C0.9600
C6—N11.401 (3)N1—O11.296 (3)
C7—N11.348 (3)N2—O21.298 (3)
C7—C81.409 (4)
C2—C1—C6119.7 (3)C7—C8—C9123.1 (3)
C2—C1—H11120.1C8—C9—H9A110.2 (3)
C6—C1—H11120.1C8—C9—H9B110.1 (2)
C1—C2—C3120.5 (3)H9A—C9—H9B108.8 (2)
C1—C2—H2119.7C7—C10—C11i112.56 (16)
C3—C2—H2119.7C7—C10—C11112.56 (16)
C2—C3—C4121.5 (3)C11i—C10—C11112.5 (3)
C2—C3—H3119.2C7—C10—H10106.2
C4—C3—H3119.2C11i—C10—H10106.2
C3—C4—C5118.4 (3)C11—C10—H10106.2
C3—C4—H4120.8C10—C11—H11A109.5
C5—C4—H4120.8C10—C11—H11B109.5
C6—C5—N2120.0 (2)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C6—C5—C4119.6 (3)C10—C11—H11C109.5
N2—C5—C4120.4 (3)H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—C1120.3 (3)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—N1119.7 (3)O1—N1—C7121.8 (2)
C1—C6—N1120.0 (3)O1—N1—C6118.2 (2)
N1—C7—C8120.0 (2)C7—N1—C6120.0 (2)
N1—C7—C10119.1 (2)O2—N2—C8121.4 (3)
C8—C7—C10120.9 (3)O2—N2—C5118.7 (2)
N2—C8—C7120.2 (3)C8—N2—C5120.0 (2)
N2—C8—C9116.6 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C30.000 (2)C8—C7—C10—C11115.8 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.000 (2)C8—C7—N1—O1180.0
C2—C3—C4—C50.000 (1)C10—C7—N1—O10.0
C3—C4—C5—C60.000 (1)C8—C7—N1—C60.0
C3—C4—C5—N2180.000 (1)C10—C7—N1—C6180.0
N2—C5—C6—C1180.0C5—C6—N1—O1180.0
C4—C5—C6—C10.000 (1)C1—C6—N1—O10.0
N2—C5—C6—N10.0C5—C6—N1—C70.0
C4—C5—C6—N1180.0C1—C6—N1—C7180.0
C2—C1—C6—C50.000 (1)C7—C8—N2—O2180.0
C2—C1—C6—N1180.0C9—C8—N2—O20.0
N1—C7—C8—N20.0C7—C8—N2—C50.0
C10—C7—C8—N2180.0C9—C8—N2—C5180.0
N1—C7—C8—C9180.0C6—C5—N2—O2180.0
C10—C7—C8—C90.0C4—C5—N2—O20.0
N1—C7—C10—C11i64.2 (2)C6—C5—N2—C80.0
C8—C7—C10—C11i−115.8 (2)C4—C5—N2—C8180.0
N1—C7—C10—C11−64.2 (2)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  3-Substituted 2-formylquinoxaline 1,4-dioxides.

Authors:  M L Edwards; R E Bambury; H W Ritter
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  New quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxides. Part 1: Hypoxia-selective cytotoxins and anticancer agents derived from quinoxaline 1,4-di-N-oxides.

Authors:  Kamelia M Amin; Magda M F Ismail; Eman Noaman; Dalia H Soliman; Yousry A Ammar
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Pyridoquinoxaline N-oxides. 2. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of tricyclic lactams.

Authors:  E A Glazer; J E Presslitz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 7.446

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.