Literature DB >> 21587590

3,3'-Dimethyl-4,4'-(hexane-1,6-di-yl)bis-[1H-1,2,4-triazol-5(4H)-one].

Reşat Ustabaş, Ufuk Coruh, Dilek Unlüer, Tuncer Hökelek, Emel Ermiş.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(12)H(20)N(6)O(2), has a centre of symmetry. The mol-ecule consists of two triazole rings joined by an aliphatic -(CH(2))(6)- chain. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter-molecular N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and by π-π stacking inter-actions between the triazole rings of inversion-related mol-ecules [centroid-centroid distance = 3.277 (8) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21587590      PMCID: PMC2983399          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background information including pharmacological studies, see: Chiu & Huskey (1998 ▶); Clemons et al. (2004 ▶); Dalloul & Boyle (2006 ▶); Eliott et al. (1986 ▶); Griffin & Mannion (1986 ▶); Santen (2003 ▶); Tanaka (1974 ▶); Zamani et al. (2003 ▶). Related structures have been reported by Ustabaş et al. (2006 ▶, 2007 ▶, 2009 ▶); Ünver et al. (2008 ▶, 2009 ▶); Çoruh et al. (2003 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H20N6O2 M = 280.34 Triclinic, a = 6.3641 (2) Å b = 7.3034 (2) Å c = 7.7774 (2) Å α = 93.299 (2)° β = 109.578 (2)° γ = 94.707 (2)° V = 338.05 (2) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 101 K 0.40 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.962, T max = 0.988 6074 measured reflections 1673 independent reflections 1309 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.112 S = 1.03 1673 reflections 131 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037311/pk2267sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810037311/pk2267Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H20N6O2Z = 1
Mr = 280.34F(000) = 150
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.377 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.3641 (2) ÅCell parameters from 1309 reflections
b = 7.3034 (2) Åθ = 2.8–28.3°
c = 7.7774 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
α = 93.299 (2)°T = 101 K
β = 109.578 (2)°Rod-shaped, colorless
γ = 94.707 (2)°0.40 × 0.16 × 0.12 mm
V = 338.05 (2) Å3
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1673 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1309 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.033
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.988k = −9→9
6074 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.062P)2 + 0.0594P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1673 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
131 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.49741 (15)0.02539 (13)0.76514 (13)0.0199 (3)
N10.84928 (18)0.18555 (15)0.81036 (15)0.0159 (3)
N20.98018 (18)0.22436 (15)1.11442 (15)0.0183 (3)
N30.76344 (18)0.13460 (15)1.04956 (15)0.0173 (3)
C10.6815 (2)0.10507 (17)0.86549 (18)0.0162 (3)
C20.8354 (2)0.1878 (2)0.61861 (18)0.0189 (3)
C30.7642 (2)0.36813 (19)0.54057 (19)0.0202 (3)
C40.5280 (2)0.40487 (19)0.53108 (19)0.0193 (3)
C51.0248 (2)0.25341 (17)0.96590 (18)0.0166 (3)
C61.2408 (2)0.3456 (2)0.9639 (2)0.0207 (3)
H210.981 (3)0.163 (2)0.609 (2)0.019 (4)*
H611.220 (3)0.461 (3)0.914 (2)0.030 (4)*
H320.772 (3)0.361 (2)0.415 (2)0.025 (4)*
H410.512 (3)0.397 (2)0.655 (2)0.018 (4)*
H310.876 (3)0.476 (2)0.614 (2)0.028 (4)*
H420.414 (3)0.309 (2)0.446 (2)0.022 (4)*
H220.732 (3)0.087 (2)0.551 (2)0.025 (4)*
H30.696 (3)0.089 (2)1.125 (3)0.036 (5)*
H621.310 (3)0.273 (3)0.887 (3)0.035 (5)*
H631.348 (3)0.368 (3)1.093 (3)0.041 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0140 (5)0.0240 (5)0.0184 (5)−0.0042 (4)0.0030 (4)0.0004 (4)
N10.0126 (6)0.0162 (6)0.0181 (6)0.0005 (4)0.0043 (5)0.0024 (4)
N20.0123 (6)0.0186 (6)0.0213 (6)−0.0005 (4)0.0028 (5)0.0012 (4)
N30.0127 (6)0.0192 (6)0.0183 (6)−0.0006 (4)0.0035 (5)0.0026 (4)
C10.0134 (6)0.0150 (6)0.0197 (7)0.0028 (5)0.0047 (5)0.0025 (5)
C20.0156 (7)0.0230 (7)0.0169 (7)−0.0009 (6)0.0049 (5)−0.0001 (5)
C30.0163 (7)0.0237 (7)0.0202 (7)−0.0017 (6)0.0065 (6)0.0039 (6)
C40.0160 (7)0.0213 (7)0.0184 (7)−0.0029 (5)0.0039 (6)0.0035 (5)
C50.0130 (6)0.0153 (6)0.0198 (7)0.0033 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0018 (5)
C60.0131 (7)0.0208 (7)0.0261 (8)−0.0005 (5)0.0045 (6)0.0021 (6)
O1—C11.2421 (16)C3—C41.5271 (19)
N1—C51.3751 (17)C3—H320.991 (16)
N1—C11.3794 (16)C3—H311.017 (18)
N1—C21.4653 (16)C4—C4i1.528 (3)
N2—C51.3031 (17)C4—H411.007 (15)
N2—N31.3907 (15)C4—H421.000 (17)
N3—C11.3467 (18)C5—C61.4856 (19)
N3—H30.902 (19)C6—H610.952 (18)
C2—C31.521 (2)C6—H621.006 (18)
C2—H210.985 (15)C6—H631.00 (2)
C2—H220.945 (18)
C5—N1—C1107.39 (11)C2—C3—H31110.3 (10)
C5—N1—C2128.60 (11)C4—C3—H31109.3 (9)
C1—N1—C2123.98 (11)H32—C3—H31107.2 (13)
C5—N2—N3103.79 (11)C3—C4—C4i112.27 (14)
C1—N3—N2112.63 (11)C3—C4—H41110.2 (9)
C1—N3—H3124.9 (12)C4i—C4—H41108.2 (8)
N2—N3—H3122.0 (12)C3—C4—H42110.5 (9)
O1—C1—N3128.98 (12)C4i—C4—H42109.0 (9)
O1—C1—N1126.86 (12)H41—C4—H42106.5 (13)
N3—C1—N1104.16 (11)N2—C5—N1111.99 (11)
N1—C2—C3112.31 (11)N2—C5—C6124.26 (13)
N1—C2—H21108.9 (9)N1—C5—C6123.74 (12)
C3—C2—H21111.3 (9)C5—C6—H61110.6 (10)
N1—C2—H22107.6 (10)C5—C6—H62113.5 (10)
C3—C2—H22110.7 (10)H61—C6—H62105.9 (14)
H21—C2—H22105.8 (13)C5—C6—H63108.9 (11)
C2—C3—C4114.14 (11)H61—C6—H63108.3 (15)
C2—C3—H32106.5 (9)H62—C6—H63109.6 (14)
C4—C3—H32109.1 (9)
C5—N2—N3—C11.87 (14)N1—C2—C3—C4−64.04 (15)
N2—N3—C1—O1178.11 (12)C2—C3—C4—C4i174.64 (14)
N2—N3—C1—N1−2.33 (14)N3—N2—C5—N1−0.58 (14)
C5—N1—C1—O1−178.57 (12)N3—N2—C5—C6−179.47 (12)
C2—N1—C1—O1−0.5 (2)C1—N1—C5—N2−0.81 (15)
C5—N1—C1—N31.86 (13)C2—N1—C5—N2−178.77 (12)
C2—N1—C1—N3179.93 (11)C1—N1—C5—C6178.09 (12)
C5—N1—C2—C3−84.62 (16)C2—N1—C5—C60.1 (2)
C1—N1—C2—C397.73 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3···O1ii0.90 (2)1.89 (2)2.7707 (15)167 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N3—H3⋯O1i0.90 (2)1.89 (2)2.7707 (15)167 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

Review 1.  Aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting: bringing the gold to a standard?

Authors:  M Clemons; R E Coleman; S Verma
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 3.  Species differences in N-glucuronidation.

Authors:  S H Chiu; S W Huskey
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 4.  Inhibition of aromatase: insights from recent studies.

Authors:  Richard J Santen
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  2-Benzoylmethyl-4-[(2-benzylidene-ethylidene)amino]-5-(2-thienylmethyl)-2H-1,2,4-triazol-3(4H)-one.

Authors:  Reşat Ustabaş; Yasemin Unver; Nevin Suleymanoğlu; Ufuk Coruh; Kemal Sancak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-04-08
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  3-Meth-oxy-4-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5(4H)-one monohydrate.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Xin-Ling Wang; Jing Yang; Xue-Fen Wu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.