Literature DB >> 21587341

European recommendations for the clinical use of HIV drug resistance testing: 2011 update.

Anne-Mieke Vandamme1, Ricardo J Camacho, Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein, Andreu de Luca, Lucia Palmisano, Dimitrios Paraskevis, Roger Paredes, Mario Poljak, Jean-Claude Schmit, Vincent Soriano, Hauke Walter, Anders Sönnerborg.   

Abstract

The European HIV Drug Resistance Guidelines Panel, established to make recommendations to clinicians and virologists, felt that sufficient new information has become available to warrant an update of its recommendations, explained in both pocket guidelines and this full paper. The Panel makes the following recommendations concerning the indications for resistance testing: for HIV-1 (i) test earliest sample for protease and reverse transcriptase drug resistance in drug-naive patients with acute or chronic infection; (ii) test protease and reverse transcriptase drug resistance at virologic failure, and other drug targets (integrase and envelope) if such drugs were part of the failing regimen; (iii) consider testing for CCR5 tropism at virologic failure or when a change of therapy has to be made in absence of detectable viral load, and in the latter case test DNA or last detectable plasma RNA; (iv) consider testing earliest detectable plasma RNA when a successful nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing therapy was inappropriately interrupted; (v) genotype source patient when postexposure prophylaxis is considered; for HIV-2, (vi) consider resistance testing where treatment change is needed after treatment failure. The Panel recommends genotyping in most situations, using updated and clinically evaluated interpretation systems. It is mandatory that laboratories performing HIV resistance tests take part regularly in external quality assurance programs, and that they consider storing samples in situations where resistance testing cannot be performed as recommended. Similarly, it is necessary that HIV clinicians and virologists take part in continuous education and discuss problematic clinical cases. Indeed, resistance test results should be used in the context of all other clinically relevant information for predicting therapy response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21587341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Rev        ISSN: 1139-6121            Impact factor:   2.500


  49 in total

1.  HIV-1 subtypes and drug resistance profiles in a cohort of heterosexual patients in Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors:  Muammer Osman Köksal; Hayati Beka; Nadine Lübke; Jens Verheyen; Haluk Eraksoy; Atahan Cagatay; Rolf Kaiser; Baki Akgül; Ali Agacfidan
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Decoding HIV resistance: from genotype to therapy.

Authors:  Irene T Weber; Robert W Harrison
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Agreement between an in-house replication competent and a reference replication defective recombinant virus assay for measuring phenotypic resistance to HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase inhibitors.

Authors:  Francesco Saladini; Alessia Giannini; Adele Boccuto; Ilaria Vicenti; Maurizio Zazzi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Ten years survey of primary HIV-1 resistance in Serbia: the occurrence of multiclass resistance.

Authors:  Maja Stanojevic; Marina Siljic; Dubravka Salemovic; Ivana Pesic-Pavlovic; Sonja Zerjav; Valentina Nikolic; Jovan Ranin; Djordje Jevtovic
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.205

5.  Validation of an oligonucleotide ligation assay for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug-resistant mutants by use of massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Ingrid A Beck; Wenjie Deng; Rachel Payant; Robert Hall; Roger E Bumgarner; James I Mullins; Lisa M Frenkel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  HIV drug resistance testing among patients failing second line antiretroviral therapy. Comparison of in-house and commercial sequencing.

Authors:  Benjamin Chimukangara; Bhavini Varyani; Tinei Shamu; Junior Mutsvangwa; Justen Manasa; Elizabeth White; Cleophas Chimbetete; Ruedi Luethy; David Katzenstein
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 7.  Implementing HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing in antiretroviral therapy programs in Africa: needs, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Richard J Lessells; Ava Avalos; Tulio de Oliveira
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Phylogenetic Investigation of a Statewide HIV-1 Epidemic Reveals Ongoing and Active Transmission Networks Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Authors:  Philip A Chan; Joseph W Hogan; Austin Huang; Allison DeLong; Marco Salemi; Kenneth H Mayer; Rami Kantor
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Prevalence and virologic consequences of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance in Uganda.

Authors:  Guinevere Q Lee; David R Bangsberg; Conrad Muzoora; Yap Boum; Jessica H Oyugi; Nneka Emenyonu; John Bennett; Peter W Hunt; David Knapp; Chanson J Brumme; P Richard Harrigan; Jeffrey N Martin
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.205

10.  Transmitted HIV drug resistance in treatment-naive Romanian patients.

Authors:  Aura Temereanca; Luminita Ene; Sanjay Mehta; Loredana Manolescu; Dan Duiculescu; Simona Ruta
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.