Literature DB >> 21585511

Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.

Adrian Schwaninger1, Janek S Lobmaier, Christian Wallraven, Stephan Collishaw.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to separately analyze the role of featural and configural face representations. Stimuli containing only featural information were created by cutting the faces into their parts and scrambling them. Stimuli only containing configural information were created by blurring the faces. Employing an old-new recognition task, the aim of Experiments 1 and 2 was to investigate whether unfamiliar faces (Exp. 1) or familiar faces (Exp. 2) can be recognized if only featural or configural information is provided. Both scrambled and blurred faces could be recognized above chance level. A further aim of Experiments 1 and 2 was to investigate whether our method of creating configural and featural stimuli is valid. Pre-activation of one form of representation did not facilitate recognition of the other, neither for unfamiliar faces (Exp. 1) nor for familiar faces (Exp. 2). This indicates a high internal validity of our method for creating configural and featural face stimuli. Experiment 3 examined whether features placed in their correct categorical relational position but with distorted metrical distances facilitated recognition of unfamiliar faces. These faces were recognized no better than the scrambled faces in Experiment 1, providing further evidence that facial features are stored independently of configural information. From these results we conclude that both featural and configural information are important to recognize a face and argue for a dual-mode hypothesis of face processing. Using the psychophysical results as motivation, we propose a computational framework that implements featural and configural processing routes using an appearance-based representation based on local features and their spatial relations. In three computational experiments (Experiments 4-6) using the same sets of stimuli, we show how this framework is able to model the psychophysical data.
Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Year:  2009        PMID: 21585511     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  5 in total

1.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

2.  Face-specific capacity limits under perceptual load do not depend on holistic processing.

Authors:  Volker Thoma
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

3.  Misaligned and Polarity-Reversed Faces Determine Face-specific Capacity Limits.

Authors:  Volker Thoma; Neil Ward; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-27

4.  Eye Tracking Research on the Influence of Spatial Frequency and Inversion Effect on Facial Expression Processing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Yishuang Yuan; Jingying Chen; Guangshuai Wang; Qian Chen; Meijuan Luo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Distinct representations of configural and part information across multiple face-selective regions of the human brain.

Authors:  Golijeh Golarai; Dara G Ghahremani; Jennifer L Eberhardt; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.