Literature DB >> 21584900

Relative 8q gain predicts disease-specific survival irrespective of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status in diagnostic biopsies of prostate cancer.

João D Barros-Silva1, Franclim R Ribeiro, Angelo Rodrigues, Ricardo Cruz, Ana T Martins, Carmen Jerónimo, Rui Henrique, Manuel R Teixeira.   

Abstract

Screening tools have greatly improved prostate cancer (PCa) detection, but the disease course is heterogeneous, and standard clinicopathological parameters do not fully discriminate aggressive from indolent tumors. To evaluate the prognostic value of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene combined with chromosome arm 8q relative gain in diagnostic biopsies of PCa, we studied a consecutive series of 200 diagnostic needle biopsies from patients with 10-year disease-specific survival data. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene status and relative 8q gain were assessed by fluorescent in situ hybridization in whole formalin fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies. The TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene was detected in 43.5% of PCa and was associated with lower Gleason score (P = 0.045), whereas relative 8q gain was present in 48% of PCa and was associated in high-Gleason score (P < 0.001). ERG rearrangement alone was not associated with clinical outcome, whereas relative 8q gain predicted worse disease-specific survival in PCa patients both with and without the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene (P < 0.001), independently of Gleason score, clinical stage, and treatment modality. We conclude that relative 8q gain in diagnostic needle biopsies is a poor prognostic factor independent of the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene status and of standard clinicopathological parameters.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584900     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  15 in total

Review 1.  TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer of West African Men and a Meta-Analysis of Racial Differences.

Authors:  Cindy Ke Zhou; Denise Young; Edward D Yeboah; Sally B Coburn; Yao Tettey; Richard B Biritwum; Andrew A Adjei; Evelyn Tay; Shelley Niwa; Ann Truelove; Judith Welsh; James E Mensah; Robert N Hoover; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Ann W Hsing; Shiv Srivastava; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Novel 5' fusion partners of ETV1 and ETV4 in prostate cancer.

Authors:  João D Barros-Silva; Paula Paulo; Anne Cathrine Bakken; Nuno Cerveira; Marthe Løvf; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Ragnhild A Lothe; Rolf Inge Skotheim; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Nuclear C-MYC expression level is associated with disease progression and potentially predictive of two year overall survival in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wen Zeng; Hanying Sun; Fankai Meng; Zeming Liu; Jing Xiong; Sheng Zhou; Fan Li; Jia Hu; Zhiquan Hu; Zheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-02-01

4.  The TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangement, ERG expression, and prostate cancer outcomes: a cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Prognostic prostate tissue biomarkers of potential clinical use.

Authors:  Theodorus H Van der Kwast
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hatem Abou-Ouf; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mandeep Takhar; Nicholas Erho; Bryan Donnelly; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Domestic dogs and cancer research: a breed-based genomics approach.

Authors:  Brian W Davis; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

8.  Combined MYC Activation and Pten Loss Are Sufficient to Create Genomic Instability and Lethal Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen K Hubbard; Laura N Mutton; May Khalili; Ryan P McMullin; Jessica L Hicks; Daniella Bianchi-Frias; Lucas A Horn; Ibrahim Kulac; Michael S Moubarek; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo; Charles J Bieberich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Cysteine-rich secretory protein-3 (CRISP3) is strongly up-regulated in prostate carcinomas with the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene.

Authors:  Franclim R Ribeiro; Paula Paulo; Vera L Costa; João D Barros-Silva; João Ramalho-Carvalho; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Guro E Lind; Rolf I Skotheim; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Altered expression of MGMT in high-grade gliomas results from the combined effect of epigenetic and genetic aberrations.

Authors:  João Ramalho-Carvalho; Malini Pires; Susana Lisboa; Inês Graça; Patrícia Rocha; João Diogo Barros-Silva; Joana Savva-Bordalo; Joaquina Maurício; Mário Resende; Manuel R Teixeira; Mrinalini Honavar; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.