Literature DB >> 21584780

Effect of maternal antibodies and pig age on the antibody response after vaccination against Glässers disease.

Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól1, Iwona Markowska-Daniel, Jarosław Rachubik, Zygmunt Pejsak.   

Abstract

The influence of age and maternal antibodies on the development and duration of postvaccinal antibody response against Glässer's disease were investigated. Pigs born to immune (MDA-positive) and non-immune (MDA-negative) sows were vaccinated with inactivated vaccine. Vaccination was done according to three different protocols: at 1 and 4, at 2 and 5 or at 4 and 7 weeks of age. There were also two control groups for MDA-negative and MDA-positive pigs. The level of Haemophilus parasuis (Hps) specific antibodies were determined using commercial ELISA test. No serological responses were seen in any of the groups after the first vaccination. Maternally derived antibodies (MDA) against Hps were above the positive level until approximately 3 weeks of life in MDA-positive pigs. In those pigs the strongest postvaccinal humoral response was observed in piglets vaccinated at 4 and 7 weeks of age. In the remaining MDA-positive piglets only slight seroconversion was noted but levels of antibodies never exceeded values considered as positive. All MDA-negative pigs produced Hps-specific antibodies after the second vaccination. The results of the present study indicated that MDA may alter the development and duration of active postvaccinal antibody response. Age of pigs at the moment of vaccination was not associated with the significant differences in the magnitude of antibody response, however influenced the kinetics of decline of Hps-specific antibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584780     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-011-9478-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  13 in total

Review 1.  Methods for analysis of cell-mediated immunity in domestic animal species.

Authors:  Matthew R Sandbulte; James A Roth
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Sow vaccination modulates the colonization of piglets by Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  M Cerdà-Cuéllar; J F Naranjo; A Verge; M Nofrarías; M Cortey; A Olvera; J Segalés; V Aragon
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Response to foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in newborn calves. Influence of age, colostral antibodies and adjuvants.

Authors:  A M Sadir; A A Schudel; O Laporte; M Braun; R A Margni
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Protective role of maternal antibodies against Haemophilus parasuis infection.

Authors:  G I Solano-Aguilar; C Pijoan; V Rapp-Gabrielson; J Collins; L F Carvalho; N Winkelman
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Interferon-gamma secretion and proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after vaccination of pigs against Aujeszky's disease in the presence of maternal immunity.

Authors:  Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól; Iwona Markowska-Daniel
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13

6.  The influence of maternal immunity on the development of the in vitro lymphocyte proliferation response against pseudorabies virus in pigs.

Authors:  A Bouma; M D De Jong; T G Kimman
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 7.  The interference by maternally-derived antibody with active immunization of farm animals against foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  R P Kitching; J S Salt
Journal:  Br Vet J       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

8.  Naturally-farrowed, artificially-reared pigs as an alternative model for experimental infection by Haemophilus parasuis.

Authors:  Simone Oliveira; Lucina Galina; Isabel Blanco; Ana Canals; Carlos Pijoan
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.310

9.  The use of different vaccination schedules for sows to protect piglets against Aujeszky's disease.

Authors:  J Casal; Ll Planasdemunt; J A Varo; M Martín
Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health       Date:  2004-02

Review 10.  Haemophilus parasuis: new trends on diagnosis, epidemiology and control.

Authors:  Simone Oliveira; Carlos Pijoan
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  6 in total

1.  Program of vaccination and antibiotic treatment to control polyserositis caused by Haemophilus parasuis under field conditions.

Authors:  Yeonsu Oh; Kiwon Han; Hwi Won Seo; Changhoon Park; Chanhee Chae
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Analysis of efficacy obtained with a trivalent inactivated Haemophilus parasuis serovars 4, 5, and 12 vaccine and commercial vaccines against Glässer's disease in piglets.

Authors:  Zhanqin Zhao; Huisheng Liu; Yun Xue; Kunpeng Chen; Zhijun Liu; Qiao Xue; Chen Wang
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  The Effect of Inactivated Mycobacterium Paratuberculosis Vaccine on the Response to a Heterologous Bacterial Challenge in Pigs.

Authors:  Kristoffer Jarlov Jensen; Mette Sif Hansen; Peter Mikael Helweg Heegaard; Christine Stabell Benn; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  TbpBY167A-Based Vaccine Can Protect Pigs against Glässer's Disease Triggered by Glaesserella parasuis SV7 Expressing TbpB Cluster I.

Authors:  Simone Ramos Prigol; Rafaela Klein; Somshukla Chaudhuri; Gabriela Paraboni Frandoloso; João Antônio Guizzo; César Bernardo Gutiérrez Martín; Anthony Bernard Schryvers; Luiz Carlos Kreutz; Rafael Frandoloso
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Immunogenomics for identification of disease resistance genes in pigs: a review focusing on Gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Shuhong Zhao; Mengjin Zhu; Hongbo Chen
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-08

6.  Haemophilus parasuis α-2,3-sialyltransferase-mediated lipooligosaccharide sialylation contributes to bacterial pathogenicity.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Lu Liu; Qi Cao; Weiting Mao; Yage Zhang; Xinyi Qu; Xuwang Cai; Yujin Lv; Huanchun Chen; Xiaojuan Xu; Xiangru Wang
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 5.882

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.