| Literature DB >> 21584231 |
Guo Guang Wang1, Xiao Hua Lu, Wei Li, Xue Zhao, Cui Zhang.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy is a long-term complication of diabetic mellitus. Many experimental evidences suggest that persistent hyperglycaemia generates intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and upregulates transforming growth factor-b1 and extracellular matrix expression in mesangial and tubular epithelial cells, which is involved of free radicals in the pathogenesis of diabetes and more importantly in the development of diabetic complications. Antioxidants effectively inhibit high-glucose- and H2O2-induced transforming growth factor-b1 and fibronectin upregulation, thus providing evidence that ROS play an important role in high glucose-induced renal injury. The flavonoid luteolin has been shown to possess direct antioxidant activity, therefore we hypothesize that it may be useful in treatment of many chronic disease associated with oxidative stress, such as diabetic nephropathy via its antioxidant properties. Our results suggested that protection against development of diabetic nephropathy by luteolin treatment involved changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content and expression of Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) protein.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21584231 PMCID: PMC3092543 DOI: 10.1155/2011/323171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Weight changes of the rats.
| Initial (g) | Final (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 190.1 ± 9.5 | 386.1 ± 25.7 |
|
| Control luteolin group | 189.4 ± 10.2 | 383.9 ± 23.5 |
|
| DM group | 195.9 ± 11.0 | 169.6 ± 12.8 |
|
| DM luteolin group | 194.3 ± 13.0 | 201.3 ± 17.8 |
Change of Blood glucose.
| 48 h (mmol/L) | 8 weeks (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 5.06 ± 0.47 | 5.51 ± 0.82 | |
| Control luteolin group | 4.98 ± 0.56 | 5.31 ± 0.83 | |
| DM group | 22.25 ± 2.56 | 21.48 ± 2.28 | |
| DM luteolin group | 21.73 ± 2.59 | 13.66 ± 1.84 |
|
Biochemical analysis in blood.
| BUN (mmol/L) | Creatinine (mmol/L) | 24-h urea protein (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 4.67 ± 0.55 | 45.06 ± 4.49 | 4.38 ± 0.94 |
| Control luteolin group | 4.51 ± 0.47 | 43.83 ± 4.76 | 4.26 ± 0.63 |
| DM group | 14.59 ± 0.76** | 89.15 ± 6.26** | 36.41 ± 4.51** |
| DM luteolin group | 8.82 ± 0.80## | 65.08 ± 5.32## | 12.61 ± 2.54## |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of eight samples from each group. **P < .01, significantly different from control group and control luteolin group. ## P < .01, significantly different from DM group.
Change of serum lipids profile.
| Groups | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | LDL (mmol/L) | HDL (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 1.53 ± 0.29 | 0.71 ± 0.14 | 2.02 ± 0.43 | 1.35 ± 0.23 |
| Control luteolin group | 1.48 ± 0.24 | 0.69 ± 0.13 | 2.12 ± 0.40 | 1.31 ± 0.25 |
| DM group | 5.60 ± 0.71** | 2.65 ± 0.51** | 7.04 ± 0.85** | 0.41 ± 0.13** |
| DM luteolin group | 2.62 ± 0.35## | 1.05 ± 0.14## | 3.47 ± 0.58## | 0.74 ± 0.17## |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of eight samples from each group. **P < .01, significantly different from control group and control luteolin group. ## P < .01, significantly different from DM group.
Change of kidney lipids profile.
| TC (mg per g protein) | TG (mg per g protein) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | 5.74 ± 0.37 | 4.51 ± 0.34 |
| Control luteolin group | 5.68 ± 0.35 | 4.39 ± 0.35 |
| DM group | 10.90 ± 0.78** | 10.68 ± 0.75** |
| DM luteolin group | 6.79 ± 0.69## | 6.14 ± 0.48## |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of eight samples from each group. **P < .01, significantly different from control group and control luteolin group. ## P < .01, significantly different from DM group.
Figure 1Changes of antioxidant effects in the kidney of each group. (A) Control rat. (B) Control rat with luteolin. (C) Diabetic rat. (D) Diabetic rats with luteolin. The kidney specimen of the diabetic group showed a markedly decrease of SOD activity and increase of MDA content (C). **P < .01, significantly different from control group and control luteolin group. ## P < .01, significantly different from DM group.
Figure 2Photomicrographs of H-E staining in the kidney of each group. (a) Control rat. (b) Control rat with luteolin. (c) Diabetic rat. (d) Diabetic rats with luteolin. The kidney specimen of the diabetic group showed markedly severe destruction in glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions such as glomerular sclerosis atrophy, interstitial expansion, and interstitial cellular infiltration (c). General morphology of glomerulus and tubulointerstitial lesions were much improved and showed quite normal appearance.
Figure 3Western blot analysis in the kidney of each group. (A) Control rat. (B) Control rat with luteolin. (C) Diabetic rat. (D) Diabetic rats with luteolin. The kidney specimen of the diabetic group showed markedly a elevated expression of HO-1 and decreased p-Akt (C). **P < .01, significantly different from control group and control luteolin group. ## P < .01, significantly different from DM group.