Literature DB >> 21583952

Hydrogen bonding in cytosinium dihydrogen phosphite.

Amel Messai, Nourredine Benali-Cherif, Erwann Jeanneau, Dominique Luneau.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(4)H(8)N(3)O(4)P(+)·H(2)PO(3) (-), the cytosine mol-ecule is monoprotonated and the phospho-ric acid is in the monoionized state. Strong hydrogen bonds, dominated by N-H⋯O inter-actions, are responsible for cohesion between the organic and inorganic layers and maintain the stability of this structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583952      PMCID: PMC2977815          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Jeffrey & Saenger (1991 ▶); Kabanos et al. (1992 ▶); Weber & Craven (1990 ▶); Sivanesan et al. (2000 ▶). For hydrogen bonds, see: Blessing (1986 ▶); Masse & Levy (1991 ▶). For related structures, see: Bendheif et al. (2003 ▶); Bouchouit et al. (2005 ▶); Benali-Cherif, Abouimrane et al. (2002 ▶); Benali-Cherif et al. (2007 ▶); Benali-Cherif, Benguedouar et al. (2002 ▶); Bendjeddou et al. (2003 ▶); Cherouana, Benali-Cherif & Bendjeddou (2003 ▶); Cherouana, Bouchouit et al. (2003 ▶); Messai et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H6N3O+·H2PO3 M = 193.10 Triclinic, a = 4.5625 (3) Å b = 6.4739 (4) Å c = 6.5933 (6) Å α = 92.934 (4)° β = 91.236 (4)° γ = 98.627 (5)° V = 192.21 (2) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.34 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: none 1500 measured reflections 1500 independent reflections 1430 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.084 S = 1.13 1500 reflections 112 parameters 4 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 580 with Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.06 (10) Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1997–2000 ▶); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014020/gw2061sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809014020/gw2061Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H6N3O+·H2PO3Z = 1
Mr = 193.10F(000) = 100
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.668 Mg m3
Hall symbol: P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.5625 (3) ÅCell parameters from 739 reflections
b = 6.4739 (4) Åθ = 0.7–27.9°
c = 6.5933 (6) ŵ = 0.34 mm1
α = 92.934 (4)°T = 293 K
β = 91.236 (4)°Cubic, yellow
γ = 98.627 (5)°0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
V = 192.21 (2) Å3
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer1430 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.0000
horizonally mounted graphite crystalθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 3.2°
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1h = −6→5
CCD rotation images, thick slices scansk = −8→8
1500 measured reflectionsl = −8→8
1500 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.084w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0447P)2 + 0.0402P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.13(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1500 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
112 parametersΔρmin = −0.33 e Å3
4 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with how many Friedel pairs?
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.06 (10)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O70.3049 (5)0.5610 (3)1.0498 (3)0.0265 (5)
N10.3442 (5)0.6856 (3)0.7331 (4)0.0213 (5)
H10.24200.78330.76420.026*
N30.5864 (5)0.4107 (3)0.8218 (3)0.0183 (5)
H30.63710.33010.91180.022*
N80.8625 (5)0.2462 (4)0.5932 (4)0.0236 (5)
H70.92270.16520.67930.028*
H80.91800.23120.47010.028*
C20.4021 (5)0.5545 (4)0.8791 (4)0.0177 (5)
C40.6911 (5)0.3898 (4)0.6323 (4)0.0178 (5)
C50.6099 (6)0.5224 (4)0.4837 (4)0.0232 (6)
H50.67110.50940.35070.028*
C60.4412 (6)0.6684 (4)0.5406 (4)0.0228 (6)
H60.39010.75930.44570.027*
P1−0.06174 (7)0.00189 (6)0.08872 (6)0.01852 (18)
O10.1928 (4)0.0549 (3)0.2547 (3)0.0209 (4)
H1A0.35380.06280.20040.031*
O20.0527 (4)−0.0044 (3)−0.1225 (3)0.0222 (4)
O3−0.2857 (4)0.1487 (3)0.1256 (3)0.0214 (4)
H9−0.172 (6)−0.1857 (19)0.137 (5)0.026*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O70.0323 (11)0.0300 (11)0.0203 (11)0.0138 (8)0.0056 (9)0.0032 (8)
N10.0274 (12)0.0176 (11)0.0212 (13)0.0108 (9)−0.0016 (10)0.0023 (9)
N30.0231 (11)0.0198 (11)0.0138 (11)0.0079 (9)−0.0004 (9)0.0043 (8)
N80.0343 (13)0.0234 (11)0.0163 (11)0.0134 (9)0.0058 (10)0.0031 (9)
C20.0175 (13)0.0174 (13)0.0181 (15)0.0036 (10)−0.0010 (10)−0.0007 (10)
C40.0218 (13)0.0166 (12)0.0150 (13)0.0034 (10)−0.0016 (11)−0.0005 (10)
C50.0327 (14)0.0224 (13)0.0165 (13)0.0094 (11)0.0002 (12)0.0042 (10)
C60.0308 (15)0.0188 (13)0.0193 (15)0.0056 (11)−0.0032 (11)0.0033 (10)
P10.0176 (3)0.0189 (3)0.0200 (4)0.0051 (2)0.0016 (2)0.0033 (2)
O10.0142 (8)0.0330 (10)0.0170 (10)0.0066 (7)0.0028 (7)0.0039 (7)
O20.0271 (10)0.0250 (10)0.0174 (10)0.0129 (8)0.0018 (8)0.0008 (8)
O30.0175 (9)0.0255 (10)0.0235 (11)0.0098 (7)0.0024 (8)0.0032 (8)
O7—C21.220 (3)C4—C51.414 (4)
N1—C61.358 (4)C5—C61.349 (4)
N1—C21.362 (4)C5—H50.9300
N1—H10.8600C6—H60.9300
N3—C41.354 (3)P1—O21.498 (2)
N3—C21.389 (3)P1—O31.5114 (18)
N3—H30.8600P1—O11.5655 (18)
N8—C41.321 (3)P1—H91.301 (16)
N8—H70.8601O1—H1A0.8200
N8—H80.8600
C6—N1—C2122.8 (2)N3—C4—C5118.4 (2)
C6—N1—H1118.6C6—C5—C4118.1 (3)
C2—N1—H1118.6C6—C5—H5121.0
C4—N3—C2123.8 (2)C4—C5—H5121.0
C4—N3—H3118.1C5—C6—N1121.5 (2)
C2—N3—H3118.1C5—C6—H6119.2
C4—N8—H7126.0N1—C6—H6119.2
C4—N8—H8117.2O2—P1—O3114.99 (10)
H7—N8—H8116.8O2—P1—O1112.60 (10)
O7—C2—N1123.7 (2)O3—P1—O1108.41 (11)
O7—C2—N3121.1 (2)O2—P1—H9110.0 (14)
N1—C2—N3115.2 (2)O3—P1—H9109.9 (13)
N8—C4—N3119.0 (2)O1—P1—H999.9 (14)
N8—C4—C5122.7 (3)P1—O1—H1A109.5
C6—N1—C2—O7−176.3 (2)C2—N3—C4—C50.3 (4)
C6—N1—C2—N34.5 (3)N8—C4—C5—C6−178.0 (3)
C4—N3—C2—O7177.1 (2)N3—C4—C5—C62.4 (4)
C4—N3—C2—N1−3.7 (3)C4—C5—C6—N1−1.7 (4)
C2—N3—C4—N8−179.2 (2)C2—N1—C6—C5−2.0 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O2i0.861.862.713 (3)170
O1—H1A···O3ii0.821.752.542 (3)163
N3—H3···O3iii0.861.942.797 (3)175
N8—H7···O2iii0.861.892.750 (3)178
N8—H8···O1ii0.862.293.034 (3)145
N8—H8···O3ii0.862.443.153 (3)141
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O2i0.861.862.713 (3)170
O1—H1A⋯O3ii0.821.752.542 (3)163
N3—H3⋯O3iii0.861.942.797 (3)175
N8—H7⋯O2iii0.861.892.750 (3)178
N8—H8⋯O1ii0.862.293.034 (3)145
N8—H8⋯O3ii0.862.443.153 (3)141

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Electrostatic properties of cytosine monohydrate from diffraction data.

Authors:  H P Weber; B M Craven
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1990-08-01

3.  Creatinium perchlorate.

Authors:  Amel Messai; Amani Direm; Nourredine Benali-Cherif; Dominique Luneau; Erwann Jeanneau
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-04

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.