Literature DB >> 21583585

4,6-Dimeth-oxy-2-(methyl-sulfan-yl)pyrimidine.

Kasthuri Balasubramani1, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(7)H(10)N(2)O(2)S, is essentially planar [maximum deviation 0.018 (4) Å]. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into chains by C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds and the chains are arranged in layers parallel to the ab plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583585      PMCID: PMC2977336          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to substituted pyrimidines, see: Salas et al. (1995 ▶); Holy et al. (1974 ▶); Hunt et al. (1980 ▶); Baker & Santi, (1965 ▶) For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶). For the stability of the temperature controller used in the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H10N2O2S M = 186.23 Orthorhombic, a = 3.9537 (2) Å b = 7.1822 (4) Å c = 30.5723 (15) Å V = 868.14 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.33 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.55 × 0.31 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.838, T max = 0.985 4467 measured reflections 1620 independent reflections 1555 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.133 S = 1.28 1620 reflections 112 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.47 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 584 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.2 (2) Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027263/ci2850sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809027263/ci2850Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H10N2O2SF(000) = 392
Mr = 186.23Dx = 1.425 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 3133 reflections
a = 3.9537 (2) Åθ = 2.7–30.7°
b = 7.1822 (4) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 30.5723 (15) ÅT = 100 K
V = 868.14 (8) Å3Plate, yellow
Z = 40.55 × 0.31 × 0.05 mm
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1620 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1555 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.033
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 1.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005)h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.838, Tmax = 0.985k = −6→8
4467 measured reflectionsl = −37→37
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.133w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 2.7239P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.28(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1620 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
112 parametersΔρmin = −0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 584 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.2 (2)
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cyrosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1) K.
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.6163 (3)0.16537 (16)0.05410 (4)0.0194 (3)
O10.7269 (9)0.2088 (4)0.21365 (10)0.0207 (8)
O21.1384 (9)−0.3287 (4)0.14636 (9)0.0200 (7)
N10.6864 (9)0.1795 (5)0.13848 (11)0.0140 (8)
N20.8979 (11)−0.0980 (5)0.10377 (11)0.0177 (8)
C10.7499 (12)0.0691 (6)0.10392 (14)0.0163 (9)
C20.9874 (12)−0.1607 (7)0.14346 (14)0.0190 (10)
C30.9362 (12)−0.0645 (6)0.18210 (14)0.0184 (10)
H3A0.9998−0.11130.20920.022*
C40.7818 (11)0.1081 (7)0.17698 (13)0.0159 (9)
C50.7262 (13)−0.0160 (7)0.01606 (14)0.0206 (10)
H5A0.66510.0217−0.01300.031*
H5B0.6069−0.12790.02360.031*
H5C0.9653−0.03850.01730.031*
C60.5624 (13)0.3873 (6)0.20817 (14)0.0200 (10)
H6A0.52760.44360.23630.030*
H6B0.34810.36990.19400.030*
H6C0.70230.46700.19060.030*
C71.1937 (13)−0.4273 (7)0.10586 (14)0.0210 (11)
H7A1.3211−0.53850.11150.032*
H7B1.3170−0.34920.08600.032*
H7C0.9797−0.45980.09310.032*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0226 (6)0.0161 (5)0.0194 (5)0.0009 (6)−0.0013 (5)0.0026 (5)
O10.0265 (19)0.0147 (16)0.0207 (15)0.0071 (14)0.0014 (14)−0.0017 (12)
O20.0249 (17)0.0127 (14)0.0225 (14)0.0059 (18)0.0005 (14)0.0001 (13)
N10.0059 (18)0.0141 (17)0.0221 (17)−0.0036 (16)0.0012 (13)0.0001 (15)
N20.019 (2)0.0143 (17)0.0200 (17)0.0012 (19)−0.0030 (17)0.0004 (14)
C10.019 (2)0.012 (2)0.019 (2)−0.006 (2)−0.0011 (19)0.0031 (16)
C20.018 (2)0.016 (2)0.023 (2)0.000 (2)0.0023 (17)0.005 (2)
C30.020 (3)0.016 (2)0.019 (2)0.001 (2)0.0027 (19)0.0040 (18)
C40.010 (2)0.019 (2)0.018 (2)−0.0014 (19)0.0056 (17)0.0014 (17)
C50.017 (3)0.024 (2)0.021 (2)0.001 (2)−0.0007 (19)0.0000 (19)
C60.022 (3)0.012 (2)0.026 (2)0.010 (2)0.003 (2)−0.0018 (18)
C70.021 (3)0.017 (2)0.026 (2)0.007 (2)−0.0007 (19)−0.0013 (18)
S1—C11.754 (4)C3—C41.390 (7)
S1—C51.799 (5)C3—H3A0.93
O1—C41.352 (5)C5—H5A0.96
O1—C61.448 (5)C5—H5B0.96
O2—C21.349 (6)C5—H5C0.96
O2—C71.443 (5)C6—H6A0.96
N1—C41.338 (5)C6—H6B0.96
N1—C11.345 (6)C6—H6C0.96
N2—C11.335 (6)C7—H7A0.96
N2—C21.342 (6)C7—H7B0.96
C2—C31.384 (6)C7—H7C0.96
C1—S1—C5101.7 (2)S1—C5—H5B109.5
C4—O1—C6116.8 (3)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C2—O2—C7116.7 (3)S1—C5—H5C109.5
C4—N1—C1114.4 (4)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N2—C2114.5 (4)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
N2—C1—N1127.9 (4)O1—C6—H6A109.5
N2—C1—S1118.9 (3)O1—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—S1113.2 (3)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
N2—C2—O2118.4 (4)O1—C6—H6C109.5
N2—C2—C3124.5 (4)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
O2—C2—C3117.1 (4)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C3—C4114.4 (4)O2—C7—H7A109.5
C2—C3—H3A122.8O2—C7—H7B109.5
C4—C3—H3A122.8H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C4—O1118.6 (4)O2—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C3124.4 (4)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
O1—C4—C3117.0 (4)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
S1—C5—H5A109.5
C2—N2—C1—N10.9 (7)C7—O2—C2—C3−179.4 (4)
C2—N2—C1—S1−179.3 (3)N2—C2—C3—C4−0.3 (7)
C4—N1—C1—N2−1.1 (7)O2—C2—C3—C4179.6 (4)
C4—N1—C1—S1179.1 (3)C1—N1—C4—O1−179.7 (4)
C5—S1—C1—N21.6 (4)C1—N1—C4—C30.4 (6)
C5—S1—C1—N1−178.5 (3)C6—O1—C4—N10.9 (6)
C1—N2—C2—O2179.9 (4)C6—O1—C4—C3−179.3 (4)
C1—N2—C2—C3−0.2 (7)C2—C3—C4—N10.1 (7)
C7—O2—C2—N20.4 (6)C2—C3—C4—O1−179.7 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···N1i0.962.623.573 (6)171
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C7—H7A⋯N1i0.962.623.573 (6)171

Symmetry code: (i) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Analogs of tetrahydrofolic acid XXIV. Further observations on the mode of pyrimidyl binding to dihydrofolic reductase and thymidylate synthetase by the 2-amino-5-(3-anilinopropyl)-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinol type of inhibitor.

Authors:  B R Baker; D V Santi
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Crystallographic and molecular-orbital studies on the geometry of antifolate drugs.

Authors:  W E Hunt; C H Schwalbe; K Bird; P D Mallinson
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1980-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  4,6-Dimeth-oxy-2-(methyl-sulfan-yl)pyrimidinium chloride.

Authors:  Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-01-09

2.  4,6-Dimeth-oxy-2-(methyl-sulfan-yl)pyrimidine-4-hy-droxy-benzoic acid (1/1).

Authors:  Kaliyaperumal Thanigaimani; Abbas Farhadikoutenaei; Suhana Arshad; Ibrahim Abdul Razak; Kasthuri Balasubramani
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.