Literature DB >> 21583396

Ethyl-enediammonium tetra-bromido-mercurate(II) monohydrate.

B Thimme Gowda, Sabine Foro, Hiromitsu Terao, Hartmut Fuess.   

Abstract

The Hg(II) atoms in the crystal structure of the title compound, (C(2)H(10)N(2))[HgBr(4)]·H(2)O, are tetra-hedrally coordinated by four Br atoms and the resulting [HgBr(4)](2-) ions are inter-connected to the [NH(3)-CH(2)-CH(2)-NH(3)](2+) ions and water mol-ecules by N-H⋯Br and O-H⋯Br bonds, forming a three-dimensional network. N-H⋯O inter-actions are also present. The observed three different Hg-Br distances of 2.5597 (6), 2.6862 (8) and 2.6923 (8) Å in the tetra-bromo-mercurate unit are due to the connection of Br atoms to different numbers of H atoms. The Hg, O and two Br atoms are located on a crystallographic mirror plane. The cation has symmetry with the center of the C-C bond lying on a crystallographic center of inversion.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583396      PMCID: PMC2977096          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902772X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For synthetic methods, see: Furukawa et al. (2005 ▶). For background to Hg–halogen bonds, see: Ishihara et al. (2002 ▶); Furukawa et al. (2005 ▶). For a related structure, see: Terao et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C2H10N2)[HgBr4]·H2O M = 600.37 Monoclinic, a = 6.4976 (6) Å b = 11.416 (1) Å c = 8.0161 (8) Å β = 103.38 (1)° V = 578.47 (9) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 27.07 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.16 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.052, T max = 0.197 2304 measured reflections 1240 independent reflections 1159 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.019

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.024 wR(F 2) = 0.062 S = 1.11 1240 reflections 55 parameters 3 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 2.00 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.60 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902772X/bt5004sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680902772X/bt5004Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C2H10N2)[HgBr4]·H2OF(000) = 532
Mr = 600.37Dx = 3.447 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybCell parameters from 1937 reflections
a = 6.4976 (6) Åθ = 2.6–27.9°
b = 11.416 (1) ŵ = 27.07 mm1
c = 8.0161 (8) ÅT = 100 K
β = 103.38 (1)°Prism, colourless
V = 578.47 (9) Å30.16 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm
Z = 2
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire CCD detector1240 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1159 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.019
Rotation method data acquisition using ω and φ scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)h = −8→7
Tmin = 0.052, Tmax = 0.197k = −10→14
2304 measured reflectionsl = −10→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.062H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.11w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0387P)2 + 1.5899P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1240 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.049
55 parametersΔρmax = 2.00 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = −1.60 e Å3
Experimental. CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.8265 (7)0.0383 (4)0.2834 (5)0.0106 (9)
H1A0.8539−0.02640.22580.013*
H1B0.90460.09960.25950.013*
H1C0.68660.05630.25010.013*
C10.8833 (8)0.0144 (5)0.4718 (6)0.0118 (11)
H110.7985−0.05210.49840.014*
H120.85110.08400.53490.014*
Hg10.55745 (4)0.25000.75798 (4)0.01179 (11)
Br10.69952 (8)0.04665 (4)0.85916 (6)0.01038 (14)
Br20.50796 (11)0.25000.41588 (9)0.01061 (17)
Br30.15662 (11)0.25000.79637 (10)0.01234 (17)
O10.0198 (8)0.25000.1966 (7)0.0125 (11)
H1O0.032 (9)0.1920 (13)0.127 (5)0.015*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.017 (2)0.006 (2)0.008 (2)0.0032 (17)0.0007 (18)0.0019 (17)
C10.018 (3)0.011 (2)0.007 (2)0.005 (2)0.005 (2)0.001 (2)
Hg10.01411 (17)0.00870 (16)0.01290 (17)0.0000.00384 (11)0.000
Br10.0130 (3)0.0098 (3)0.0085 (2)0.00092 (19)0.00280 (19)0.00217 (19)
Br20.0128 (3)0.0093 (3)0.0090 (3)0.0000.0010 (3)0.000
Br30.0134 (4)0.0072 (3)0.0185 (4)0.0000.0079 (3)0.000
O10.015 (3)0.010 (3)0.014 (3)0.0000.005 (2)0.000
N1—C11.495 (6)C1—H120.9900
N1—H1A0.9100Hg1—Br1ii2.5597 (6)
N1—H1B0.9100Hg1—Br12.5597 (6)
N1—H1C0.9100Hg1—Br22.6862 (8)
C1—C1i1.515 (10)Hg1—Br32.6923 (8)
C1—H110.9900O1—H1O0.881 (19)
C1—N1—H1A109.5N1—C1—H12109.7
C1—N1—H1B109.5C1i—C1—H12109.7
H1A—N1—H1B109.5H11—C1—H12108.2
C1—N1—H1C109.5Br1ii—Hg1—Br1130.16 (3)
H1A—N1—H1C109.5Br1ii—Hg1—Br2105.823 (15)
H1B—N1—H1C109.5Br1—Hg1—Br2105.823 (15)
N1—C1—C1i109.7 (5)Br1ii—Hg1—Br3104.551 (15)
N1—C1—H11109.7Br1—Hg1—Br3104.551 (15)
C1i—C1—H11109.7Br2—Hg1—Br3103.08 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Br3iii0.912.563.359 (5)147
N1—H1A···Br1i0.913.143.655 (5)118
N1—H1B···O1iv0.911.982.882 (5)169
N1—H1C···Br1iii0.912.723.482 (4)141
N1—H1C···Br20.912.953.503 (5)121
O1—H1O···Br3v0.88 (2)3.02 (3)3.521 (6)118 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Br3i0.912.563.359 (5)147
N1—H1A⋯Br1ii0.913.143.655 (5)118
N1—H1B⋯O1iii0.911.982.882 (5)169
N1—H1C⋯Br1i0.912.723.482 (4)141
N1—H1C⋯Br20.912.953.503 (5)121
O1—H1O⋯Br3iv0.881 (19)3.02 (3)3.521 (6)118 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Guanidinium tetra-bromidomercurate(II).

Authors:  Hiromitsu Terao; Thorsten M Gesing; Hideta Ishihara; Yoshihiro Furukawa; B Thimme Gowda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-02-25

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bis(2,4-dimethyl-pyridinium) tetra-bromido-mercurate(II).

Authors:  Rawhi Al-Far; Salim F Haddad; Basem F Ali
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-11-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.