Literature DB >> 21583284

3-Methyl-thio-benzamide.

Mahmood-Ul-Hassan Khan, Shahid Hameed, Tashfeen Akhtar, Jason D Masuda.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(9)NS, the dihedral angle between the aromatic ring and the thio-amide fragment is 36.0 (2)°. There are π-stacking inter-actions between coplanar aryl fragments, with a centroid-centroid separation of 3.658 (2) Å. In addition, there are inter-molecular hydrogen bonds between the amino group and the S atoms.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583284      PMCID: PMC2969531          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For our previous work on the synthesis and biological screening of five-membered heterocycles, see: Akhtar et al. (2006 ▶, 2007 ▶, 2008 ▶); Serwar et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures, see: Jian et al. (2006 ▶); Khan et al. (2009a ▶,b ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H9NS M = 151.22 Monoclinic, a = 7.717 (5) Å b = 10.267 (7) Å c = 10.100 (7) Å β = 97.186 (9)° V = 794.0 (9) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.33 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.37 × 0.27 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.793, T max = 0.930 6234 measured reflections 1797 independent reflections 1447 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.039 wR(F 2) = 0.112 S = 1.08 1797 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019849/bt2967sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019849/bt2967Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H9NSF(000) = 320
Mr = 151.22Dx = 1.265 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2572 reflections
a = 7.717 (5) Åθ = 2.7–27.1°
b = 10.267 (7) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 10.100 (7) ÅT = 296 K
β = 97.186 (9)°Block, yellow
V = 794.0 (9) Å30.37 × 0.27 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1797 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1447 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.021
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)h = −10→9
Tmin = 0.793, Tmax = 0.930k = −13→13
6234 measured reflectionsl = −11→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0556P)2 + 0.242P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1797 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.29 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.13324 (7)0.62675 (4)0.16035 (4)0.05023 (19)
N10.0243 (2)0.38549 (15)0.17149 (16)0.0521 (4)
H1A0.01870.31130.21030.063*
H1B−0.02600.39630.09140.063*
C20.1933 (2)0.45618 (15)0.37261 (16)0.0358 (4)
C10.1099 (2)0.48241 (16)0.23470 (16)0.0379 (4)
C30.2661 (2)0.33439 (17)0.40481 (18)0.0406 (4)
H3A0.25350.26830.34140.049*
C70.2072 (2)0.55347 (17)0.46931 (18)0.0435 (4)
H7A0.15890.63520.44920.052*
C40.3569 (2)0.30980 (18)0.52939 (19)0.0455 (4)
C50.3695 (2)0.4084 (2)0.62387 (18)0.0500 (5)
H5A0.43030.39350.70790.060*
C60.2927 (3)0.5286 (2)0.59491 (19)0.0501 (5)
H6A0.29890.59270.66040.060*
C80.4466 (3)0.1803 (2)0.5575 (2)0.0671 (6)
H8A0.37100.11150.52100.101*
H8B0.47290.16860.65220.101*
H8C0.55290.17860.51730.101*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0774 (4)0.0330 (2)0.0387 (3)0.0000 (2)0.0007 (2)0.00264 (17)
N10.0726 (11)0.0435 (8)0.0363 (8)−0.0142 (7)−0.0089 (7)0.0048 (6)
C20.0384 (8)0.0362 (8)0.0329 (8)−0.0031 (6)0.0046 (6)0.0001 (6)
C10.0439 (9)0.0345 (8)0.0351 (9)0.0016 (6)0.0042 (7)−0.0013 (6)
C30.0461 (9)0.0380 (8)0.0379 (9)−0.0003 (7)0.0066 (7)0.0007 (7)
C70.0508 (10)0.0396 (9)0.0398 (9)−0.0018 (7)0.0045 (8)−0.0032 (7)
C40.0433 (9)0.0492 (10)0.0446 (10)0.0012 (7)0.0078 (7)0.0129 (8)
C50.0482 (10)0.0674 (12)0.0332 (9)−0.0082 (9)−0.0003 (8)0.0076 (8)
C60.0576 (11)0.0554 (11)0.0369 (10)−0.0097 (9)0.0040 (8)−0.0083 (8)
C80.0737 (14)0.0647 (14)0.0630 (14)0.0205 (11)0.0093 (11)0.0223 (11)
S1—C11.6811 (19)C7—H7A0.9300
N1—C11.315 (2)C4—C51.386 (3)
N1—H1A0.8600C4—C81.509 (3)
N1—H1B0.8600C5—C61.384 (3)
C2—C71.392 (2)C5—H5A0.9300
C2—C31.393 (2)C6—H6A0.9300
C2—C11.484 (2)C8—H8A0.9600
C3—C41.385 (3)C8—H8B0.9600
C3—H3A0.9300C8—H8C0.9600
C7—C61.379 (3)
C1—N1—H1A120.0C3—C4—C5118.45 (17)
C1—N1—H1B120.0C3—C4—C8119.99 (18)
H1A—N1—H1B120.0C5—C4—C8121.49 (19)
C7—C2—C3119.16 (16)C6—C5—C4120.95 (18)
C7—C2—C1120.98 (15)C6—C5—H5A119.5
C3—C2—C1119.80 (15)C4—C5—H5A119.5
N1—C1—C2116.80 (15)C7—C6—C5120.17 (17)
N1—C1—S1121.71 (14)C7—C6—H6A119.9
C2—C1—S1121.41 (12)C5—C6—H6A119.9
C4—C3—C2121.29 (17)C4—C8—H8A109.5
C4—C3—H3A119.4C4—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—H3A119.4H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C6—C7—C2119.91 (17)C4—C8—H8C109.5
C6—C7—H7A120.0H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C7—H7A120.0H8B—C8—H8C109.5
N1—C1—C2—C336.0 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···S1i0.862.663.455 (2)155
N1—H1B···S1ii0.862.583.422 (3)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯S1i0.862.663.455 (2)155
N1—H1B⋯S1ii0.862.583.422 (3)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Syntheses, urease inhibition, and antimicrobial studies of some chiral 3-substituted-4-amino-5-thioxo-1H,4H-1,2,4-triazoles.

Authors:  Tashfeen Akhtar; Shahid Hameed; Khalid Mohammed Khan; Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary
Journal:  Med Chem       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  4-Chloro-benzothio-amide.

Authors:  Mahmood-Ul-Hassan Khan; Shahid Hameed; Tashfeen Akhtar; Jason D Masuda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-04-25

4.  4-Bromo-thio-benzamide.

Authors:  Mahmood-Ul-Hassan Khan; Shahid Hameed; Tashfeen Akhtar; Jason D Masuda
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-05-20
  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  4-Methyl-benzene-carbothio-amide.

Authors:  Saqib Ali; Shahid Hameed; Ahmad Luqman; Tashfeen Akhtar; Masood Parvez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-08

2.  4-Methoxy-benzene-carbothio-amide.

Authors:  Saqib Ali; Shahid Hameed; Ahmad Luqman; Tashfeen Akhtar; Masood Parvez
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-05-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.