Literature DB >> 21583254

3-[3-(2-Pyrid-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propan-amide.

Feng Huang1, Bin Jin, Jian-Feng Zhang.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(11)H(12)N(4)O, the pyrazole and pyridine rings are nearly coplanar [dihedral angle = 1.87 (5)°]. Adjacent mol-ecules are linked by N-H⋯N and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds into a linear chain running along the c axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583254      PMCID: PMC2969522          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the chemistry of 3-(2-pyrid­yl)pyrazoles, see: Ruben et al. (2004 ▶); Steel (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H12N4O M = 216.25 Triclinic, a = 7.7446 (15) Å b = 8.3517 (17) Å c = 8.4804 (17) Å α = 97.99 (3)° β = 98.95 (3)° γ = 90.40 (3)° V = 536.4 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.58 × 0.55 × 0.27 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.947, T max = 0.972 5019 measured reflections 2410 independent reflections 1937 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.029

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.139 S = 1.12 2410 reflections 146 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019060/ng2581sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809019060/ng2581Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H12N4OZ = 2
Mr = 216.25F(000) = 228
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.339 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.7446 (15) ÅCell parameters from 5019 reflections
b = 8.3517 (17) Åθ = 3.2–27.4°
c = 8.4804 (17) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 97.99 (3)°T = 293 K
β = 98.95 (3)°Block, colorless
γ = 90.40 (3)°0.58 × 0.55 × 0.27 mm
V = 536.4 (2) Å3
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer2410 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1937 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.029
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.2°
ω scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.972l = −10→10
5019 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.139w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0807P)2 + 0.0265P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.12(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2410 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
146 parametersΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.038 (11)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.41230 (16)0.30020 (14)0.39463 (14)0.0502 (3)
H1A0.50370.36230.40580.060*
H1B0.40390.21100.32930.060*
O10.28772 (12)0.46829 (11)0.57395 (12)0.0495 (3)
C10.28366 (17)0.34222 (15)0.47849 (14)0.0391 (3)
C20.13022 (19)0.22241 (18)0.44677 (16)0.0509 (4)
H2A0.06830.22570.33870.061*
H2B0.17480.11450.45030.061*
C30.00195 (18)0.25207 (18)0.56416 (17)0.0477 (4)
H3A−0.03730.36230.56640.057*
H3B−0.09940.18010.52660.057*
N20.07610 (14)0.22676 (13)0.72718 (13)0.0403 (3)
C40.0879 (2)0.33312 (17)0.86282 (18)0.0500 (4)
H4A0.05180.43950.87030.060*
C50.1622 (2)0.25694 (17)0.98736 (17)0.0496 (4)
H5A0.18740.29961.09590.060*
C60.19232 (15)0.09985 (15)0.91577 (15)0.0367 (3)
N30.13956 (14)0.08220 (13)0.75618 (13)0.0401 (3)
C70.26942 (15)−0.03550 (14)0.99317 (15)0.0368 (3)
C80.28816 (18)−0.18581 (16)0.90392 (18)0.0457 (3)
H8A0.2547−0.20210.79260.055*
C90.3569 (2)−0.30988 (17)0.9829 (2)0.0555 (4)
H9A0.3706−0.41100.92530.067*
C100.4054 (2)−0.28298 (19)1.1479 (2)0.0576 (4)
H10A0.4498−0.36551.20410.069*
C110.3862 (2)−0.13031 (19)1.22693 (19)0.0538 (4)
H11A0.4210−0.11161.33810.065*
N40.32045 (15)−0.00708 (14)1.15354 (14)0.0451 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0535 (7)0.0437 (6)0.0500 (7)−0.0114 (5)0.0099 (5)−0.0069 (5)
O10.0528 (6)0.0395 (5)0.0531 (6)−0.0070 (4)0.0085 (5)−0.0038 (4)
C10.0461 (7)0.0361 (6)0.0327 (6)−0.0044 (5)−0.0025 (5)0.0070 (5)
C20.0590 (9)0.0539 (8)0.0366 (7)−0.0193 (7)0.0031 (6)0.0012 (6)
C30.0437 (7)0.0515 (8)0.0466 (8)−0.0067 (6)−0.0011 (6)0.0121 (6)
N20.0428 (6)0.0378 (6)0.0409 (6)0.0012 (4)0.0078 (4)0.0057 (4)
C40.0662 (9)0.0374 (7)0.0486 (8)0.0102 (6)0.0171 (7)0.0040 (6)
C50.0715 (9)0.0410 (7)0.0364 (7)0.0097 (6)0.0124 (6)0.0007 (5)
C60.0361 (6)0.0354 (6)0.0389 (7)−0.0020 (5)0.0092 (5)0.0028 (5)
N30.0408 (6)0.0356 (5)0.0421 (6)−0.0008 (4)0.0037 (4)0.0019 (4)
C70.0326 (6)0.0358 (6)0.0418 (7)−0.0022 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0031 (5)
C80.0439 (7)0.0412 (7)0.0479 (8)0.0025 (5)0.0031 (6)−0.0025 (6)
C90.0539 (8)0.0384 (7)0.0704 (10)0.0086 (6)0.0045 (7)−0.0001 (7)
C100.0580 (9)0.0467 (8)0.0698 (11)0.0122 (7)0.0072 (7)0.0175 (7)
C110.0603 (9)0.0545 (8)0.0469 (8)0.0079 (7)0.0048 (6)0.0120 (7)
N40.0515 (7)0.0417 (6)0.0417 (6)0.0033 (5)0.0072 (5)0.0041 (5)
N1—C11.3332 (18)C5—C61.4040 (18)
N1—H1A0.8600C5—H5A0.9300
N1—H1B0.8600C6—N31.3386 (16)
O1—C11.2328 (16)C6—C71.4693 (18)
C1—C21.5150 (18)C7—N41.3431 (18)
C2—C31.511 (2)C7—C81.3938 (19)
C2—H2A0.9700C8—C91.377 (2)
C2—H2B0.9700C8—H8A0.9300
C3—N21.4566 (18)C9—C101.378 (2)
C3—H3A0.9700C9—H9A0.9300
C3—H3B0.9700C10—C111.376 (2)
N2—C41.3427 (19)C10—H10A0.9300
N2—N31.3464 (16)C11—N41.3389 (19)
C4—C51.362 (2)C11—H11A0.9300
C4—H4A0.9300
C1—N1—H1A120.0C4—C5—C6104.82 (13)
C1—N1—H1B120.0C4—C5—H5A127.6
H1A—N1—H1B120.0C6—C5—H5A127.6
O1—C1—N1123.19 (12)N3—C6—C5110.81 (12)
O1—C1—C2122.26 (12)N3—C6—C7120.56 (11)
N1—C1—C2114.55 (11)C5—C6—C7128.63 (12)
C3—C2—C1114.53 (11)C6—N3—N2104.84 (10)
C3—C2—H2A108.6N4—C7—C8121.89 (13)
C1—C2—H2A108.6N4—C7—C6116.74 (11)
C3—C2—H2B108.6C8—C7—C6121.38 (12)
C1—C2—H2B108.6C9—C8—C7119.08 (14)
H2A—C2—H2B107.6C9—C8—H8A120.5
N2—C3—C2112.93 (12)C7—C8—H8A120.5
N2—C3—H3A109.0C8—C9—C10119.41 (14)
C2—C3—H3A109.0C8—C9—H9A120.3
N2—C3—H3B109.0C10—C9—H9A120.3
C2—C3—H3B109.0C11—C10—C9118.01 (15)
H3A—C3—H3B107.8C11—C10—H10A121.0
C4—N2—N3111.95 (11)C9—C10—H10A121.0
C4—N2—C3127.56 (12)N4—C11—C10123.96 (15)
N3—N2—C3120.47 (11)N4—C11—H11A118.0
N2—C4—C5107.59 (13)C10—C11—H11A118.0
N2—C4—H4A126.2C11—N4—C7117.61 (12)
C5—C4—H4A126.2
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.862.112.968 (2)175
N1—H1B···N4ii0.862.213.055 (2)167
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i0.862.112.968 (2)175
N1—H1B⋯N4ii0.862.213.055 (2)167

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  Grid-type metal ion architectures: functional metallosupramolecular arrays.

Authors:  Mario Ruben; Javier Rojo; Francisco J Romero-Salguero; Lindsay H Uppadine; Jean-Marie Lehn
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Ligand design in multimetallic architectures: six lessons learned.

Authors:  Peter J Steel
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  3-(5-Methyl-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)propanamide monohydrate.

Authors:  Shu-Jiao Chen; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.