Literature DB >> 21583237

3-(1H-Tetra-zol-5-yl)pyridinium chloride.

Jing Dai1, Miao-Jia Yu.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C(6)H(6)N(5) (+)·Cl(-), the pyridinium and tetra-zole rings are nearly coplanar, making a dihedral angle of 5.05 (12)°. The cations and anions are connected by inter-molecular N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming a centrosymmetric [2 + 2] aggregate. The aggregates are stacked along the a axis.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21583237      PMCID: PMC2969833          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of tetra­zole derivatives in coordination chemistry, see: Xiong et al. (2002 ▶); Wang et al. (2005 ▶). For the crystal structures of related compounds, see: Dai & Fu (2008 ▶); Wen (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H6N5 +·Cl− M = 183.61 Monoclinic, a = 4.2741 (9) Å b = 8.1992 (16) Å c = 23.559 (5) Å β = 94.72 (3)° V = 822.8 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.41 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.883, T max = 0.921 8164 measured reflections 1862 independent reflections 1431 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.104 S = 1.03 1862 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.28 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018972/is2410sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809018972/is2410Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H6N5+·ClF(000) = 376
Mr = 183.61Dx = 1.482 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1862 reflections
a = 4.2741 (9) Åθ = 3.0–27.3°
b = 8.1992 (16) ŵ = 0.41 mm1
c = 23.559 (5) ÅT = 298 K
β = 94.72 (3)°Block, colorless
V = 822.8 (3) Å30.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1862 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1431 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.041
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.3°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −5→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.883, Tmax = 0.921l = −30→30
8164 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.104H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0463P)2 + 0.2136P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1862 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.28 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.08068 (11)0.24606 (6)0.463087 (19)0.04954 (18)
N10.4537 (4)0.72566 (17)0.43139 (6)0.0410 (4)
H1A0.54370.75210.46410.049*
N20.6191 (4)0.25335 (16)0.35565 (6)0.0389 (4)
H20.73890.26240.38670.047*
N30.5985 (4)0.12105 (19)0.32164 (7)0.0467 (4)
N40.3940 (4)0.1567 (2)0.27942 (7)0.0495 (4)
N50.2793 (4)0.31072 (19)0.28532 (7)0.0446 (4)
C10.5092 (4)0.5771 (2)0.41068 (7)0.0365 (4)
H10.64080.50500.43170.044*
C20.3697 (4)0.53090 (19)0.35769 (6)0.0307 (4)
C30.1717 (4)0.6434 (2)0.32759 (7)0.0373 (4)
H30.07510.61550.29210.045*
C40.1194 (5)0.7958 (2)0.35038 (8)0.0444 (5)
H4−0.01110.87040.33040.053*
C50.2639 (5)0.8356 (2)0.40346 (8)0.0465 (5)
H50.23010.93700.41960.056*
C60.4224 (4)0.3690 (2)0.33340 (7)0.0322 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0494 (3)0.0611 (3)0.0360 (3)0.0092 (2)−0.0094 (2)−0.0010 (2)
N10.0493 (9)0.0431 (9)0.0296 (8)0.0010 (7)−0.0028 (7)−0.0053 (6)
N20.0425 (8)0.0389 (8)0.0337 (8)0.0066 (6)−0.0069 (6)−0.0040 (6)
N30.0535 (9)0.0397 (9)0.0459 (9)0.0048 (7)−0.0019 (7)−0.0063 (7)
N40.0576 (10)0.0420 (9)0.0468 (9)0.0019 (7)−0.0084 (8)−0.0098 (7)
N50.0528 (9)0.0392 (8)0.0391 (8)0.0018 (7)−0.0121 (7)−0.0045 (7)
C10.0395 (9)0.0390 (9)0.0298 (8)0.0035 (7)−0.0042 (7)0.0021 (7)
C20.0321 (8)0.0331 (8)0.0265 (8)−0.0003 (7)0.0003 (6)0.0011 (6)
C30.0392 (9)0.0402 (9)0.0311 (8)0.0015 (7)−0.0048 (7)0.0028 (7)
C40.0473 (11)0.0400 (10)0.0450 (11)0.0090 (8)−0.0014 (9)0.0073 (8)
C50.0560 (12)0.0356 (10)0.0482 (11)0.0051 (9)0.0066 (9)−0.0025 (9)
C60.0319 (8)0.0355 (9)0.0286 (8)0.0000 (7)−0.0009 (6)0.0030 (7)
N1—C11.340 (2)C1—C21.391 (2)
N1—C51.348 (2)C1—H10.9300
N1—H1A0.8600C2—C31.404 (2)
N2—C61.345 (2)C2—C61.470 (2)
N2—N31.347 (2)C3—C41.385 (3)
N2—H20.8600C3—H30.9300
N3—N41.302 (2)C4—C51.387 (3)
N4—N51.366 (2)C4—H40.9300
N5—C61.331 (2)C5—H50.9300
C1—N1—C5123.19 (15)C2—C3—H3119.8
C1—N1—H1A118.4N4—N3—N2106.29 (14)
C5—N1—H1A118.4C3—C4—C5119.18 (16)
N1—C1—C2119.91 (15)C3—C4—H4120.4
N1—C1—H1120.0C5—C4—H4120.4
C2—C1—H1120.0N3—N4—N5110.72 (14)
C1—C2—C3118.05 (16)C6—N5—N4105.96 (14)
C1—C2—C6121.81 (14)N1—C5—C4119.22 (17)
C3—C2—C6120.13 (14)N1—C5—H5120.4
C6—N2—N3109.14 (14)C4—C5—H5120.4
C6—N2—H2125.4N5—C6—N2107.90 (15)
N3—N2—H2125.4N5—C6—C2125.52 (15)
C4—C3—C2120.44 (16)N2—C6—C2126.58 (14)
C4—C3—H3119.8
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1i0.862.253.0625 (18)157
N2—H2···Cl1ii0.862.233.0790 (18)171
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1i0.862.253.0625 (18)157
N2—H2⋯Cl1ii0.862.233.0790 (18)171

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  Novel, acentric metal-organic coordination polymers from hydrothermal reactions involving in situ ligand synthesis.

Authors:  Ren-Gen Xiong; Xiang Xue; Hong Zhao; Xiao-Zeng You; Brendan F Abrahams; Ziling Xue
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Syntheses, crystal structures, and luminescent properties of three novel zinc coordination polymers with tetrazolyl ligands.

Authors:  Xi-Sen Wang; Yun-Zhi Tang; Xue-Feng Huang; Zhi-Rong Qu; Chi-Ming Che; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  2-{4-[5-(3-Pyrid-yl)-2H-tetra-zol-2-ylmeth-yl]phen-yl}benzonitrile.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Da-Wei Fu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-07-09

5.  Diaqua-[5-(2-pyrid-yl)tetra-zolato-κN,N]manganese(II).

Authors:  Xiao-Chun Wen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-05-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.