Literature DB >> 21582938

Bis(3-hydroxy-pyridinium) fumarate.

Lan Shen, Jun-Hua Li, Jing-Jing Nie, Duan-Jun Xu.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, 2C(5)H(6)NO(2) (+)·C(4)H(2)O(4) (2-), consists of 3-hydroxy-pyridinium cations and fumarate dianions. The dianion is located on an inversion center and the cation is linked to it by O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The cation is twisted with respect to the anion by 24.83 (5)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582938      PMCID: PMC2969193          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809023800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Thomas et al. (2007 ▶); Fidler et al. (2003 ▶); Zhang et al. (2004 ▶). For the ionization of hydro­pyridine in the solution, see: Lezina et al. (1981 ▶). For 3-hydro­pyridinium salts, see: Aakeroy & Nieuwenhuyzen (1994 ▶); Fukunaga et al. (2004 ▶). For co-crystals of neutral pyridine derivatives and neutral fumaric acid, see: Bowes et al. (2003 ▶); Aakeroy et al. (2002 ▶); Haynes et al. (2006 ▶); Bu et al. (2007 ▶); Xu et al. (2009 ▶). For C—O bond distances in the deprotonated carboxyl groups of fumarates, see: Liu et al. (2003 ▶); Liu & Xu (2004 ▶); Xu et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

2C5H6NOC4H2O4 2− M = 306.27 Monoclinic, a = 3.8037 (5) Å b = 10.4798 (13) Å c = 17.423 (2) Å β = 90.360 (5)° V = 694.52 (15) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.12 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.32 × 0.28 × 0.24 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer Absorption correction: none 7561 measured reflections 1359 independent reflections 1237 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.024

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.037 wR(F 2) = 0.100 S = 1.07 1359 reflections 107 parameters 2 restraints H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.14 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809023800/ng2594sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809023800/ng2594Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
2C5H6NO+·C4H2O42F(000) = 320
Mr = 306.27Dx = 1.465 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 2322 reflections
a = 3.8037 (5) Åθ = 2.4–24.6°
b = 10.4798 (13) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 17.423 (2) ÅT = 294 K
β = 90.360 (5)°Prism, colorless
V = 694.52 (15) Å30.32 × 0.28 × 0.24 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer1237 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.024
graphiteθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.3°
ω scansh = −4→4
7561 measured reflectionsk = −12→12
1359 independent reflectionsl = −20→21
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.100w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0527P)2 + 0.1474P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1359 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
107 parametersΔρmin = −0.14 e Å3
2 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.116 (10)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.0136 (3)0.56088 (11)0.76518 (6)0.0373 (3)
O10.2604 (3)0.49000 (9)0.63451 (5)0.0489 (3)
O20.4289 (3)0.69067 (9)0.62330 (5)0.0568 (4)
O3−0.2084 (3)0.39098 (10)0.93748 (6)0.0559 (3)
C10.3982 (3)0.58033 (12)0.59760 (7)0.0368 (3)
C20.5267 (3)0.55371 (13)0.51822 (7)0.0375 (3)
H20.65220.61740.49330.045*
C3−0.0215 (3)0.46506 (12)0.81483 (7)0.0357 (3)
H30.05260.38360.80120.043*
C4−0.1676 (3)0.48541 (12)0.88672 (7)0.0366 (3)
C5−0.2754 (3)0.60885 (13)0.90499 (7)0.0410 (3)
H5−0.37630.62560.95240.049*
C6−0.2323 (4)0.70583 (13)0.85271 (8)0.0431 (3)
H6−0.30190.78850.86470.052*
C7−0.0849 (4)0.67954 (13)0.78221 (8)0.0418 (3)
H7−0.05430.74470.74660.050*
H10.103 (4)0.5407 (17)0.7195 (6)0.063*
H3A−0.127 (5)0.3217 (12)0.9213 (10)0.063*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0428 (6)0.0421 (6)0.0271 (5)−0.0016 (5)0.0072 (4)0.0009 (4)
O10.0743 (7)0.0392 (6)0.0333 (5)−0.0081 (4)0.0207 (5)−0.0027 (4)
O20.0928 (9)0.0383 (6)0.0397 (6)−0.0108 (5)0.0225 (5)−0.0095 (4)
O30.0852 (8)0.0450 (6)0.0378 (6)0.0079 (5)0.0253 (5)0.0091 (4)
C10.0467 (7)0.0355 (7)0.0283 (6)−0.0003 (5)0.0071 (5)−0.0027 (5)
C20.0468 (7)0.0369 (7)0.0290 (6)−0.0030 (5)0.0103 (5)0.0003 (5)
C30.0420 (7)0.0342 (6)0.0310 (6)0.0005 (5)0.0076 (5)−0.0018 (5)
C40.0407 (7)0.0406 (7)0.0285 (6)−0.0012 (5)0.0072 (5)0.0016 (5)
C50.0441 (7)0.0472 (8)0.0318 (6)0.0042 (6)0.0087 (5)−0.0056 (6)
C60.0481 (7)0.0363 (7)0.0450 (7)0.0055 (5)0.0039 (6)−0.0043 (5)
C70.0482 (8)0.0386 (7)0.0387 (7)−0.0001 (5)0.0044 (5)0.0067 (5)
N1—C71.3327 (17)C2—H20.9300
N1—C31.3327 (16)C3—C41.3898 (17)
N1—H10.893 (12)C3—H30.9300
O1—C11.2603 (15)C4—C51.3945 (18)
O2—C11.2452 (15)C5—C61.3752 (19)
O3—C41.3369 (15)C5—H50.9300
O3—H3A0.839 (14)C6—C71.3813 (19)
C1—C21.4962 (16)C6—H60.9300
C2—C2i1.308 (3)C7—H70.9300
C7—N1—C3121.94 (11)O3—C4—C3122.09 (12)
C7—N1—H1121.9 (12)O3—C4—C5120.01 (11)
C3—N1—H1116.2 (12)C3—C4—C5117.90 (11)
C4—O3—H3A111.9 (13)C6—C5—C4119.86 (11)
O2—C1—O1123.54 (11)C6—C5—H5120.1
O2—C1—C2118.36 (11)C4—C5—H5120.1
O1—C1—C2118.10 (11)C5—C6—C7119.49 (12)
C2i—C2—C1123.96 (15)C5—C6—H6120.3
C2i—C2—H2118.0C7—C6—H6120.3
C1—C2—H2118.0N1—C7—C6120.03 (12)
N1—C3—C4120.77 (12)N1—C7—H7120.0
N1—C3—H3119.6C6—C7—H7120.0
C4—C3—H3119.6
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O10.89 (1)1.69 (1)2.5774 (14)175 (2)
O3—H3A···O2ii0.84 (1)1.75 (2)2.5831 (15)172 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O10.893 (12)1.687 (12)2.5774 (14)175.2 (18)
O3—H3A⋯O2i0.839 (14)1.751 (15)2.5831 (15)171.5 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  7 in total

1.  Salts of maleic and fumaric acids with organic polyamines: comparison of isomeric acids as building blocks in supramolecular chemistry.

Authors:  Katharine F Bowes; George Ferguson; Alan J Lough; Christopher Glidewell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2003-01-28

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Reactivity of dimethyl fumarate and methylhydrogen fumarate towards glutathione and N-acetyl-L-cysteine--preparation of S-substituted thiosuccinic acid esters.

Authors:  Thomas J Schmidt; Muharrem Ak; Ulrich Mrowietz
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  A high-yielding supramolecular reaction.

Authors:  Christer B Aakeröy; Alicia M Beatty; Brian A Helfrich
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  2-Pyridone-tartronic acid (1/1), 3-hydroxypyridinium hydrogen tartronate and 4-hydroxypyridinium hydrogen tartronate.

Authors:  Takeo Fukunaga; Setsuo Kashino; Hiroyuki Ishida
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Iron absorption from ferrous fumarate in adult women is influenced by ascorbic acid but not by Na2EDTA.

Authors:  Meredith C Fidler; Lena Davidsson; Christophe Zeder; Thomas Walczyk; Richard F Hurrell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  4-Acetyl-pyridine-fumaric acid (2/1).

Authors:  Kan Xu; Bing-Yu Zhang; Jing-Jing Nie; Duan-Jun Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-06-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.