Literature DB >> 21582770

4-Acetyl-pyridine-fumaric acid (2/1).

Kan Xu, Bing-Yu Zhang, Jing-Jing Nie, Duan-Jun Xu.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title cocrystal, 2C(7)H(7)NO·C(4)H(4)O(4), the complete fumaric acid mol-ecule is generated by a crystallographic inversion centre. The two components of the cocrystal are linked by an O-H⋯N hydrogen bond.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21582770      PMCID: PMC2969508          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809020480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For biological and medicinal applications of 4-acetyl­pyridine and fumaric acid, see: Fidler et al. (2003 ▶); Thomas et al. (2007 ▶). For mol­ecular complexes of neutral pyridine derivatives and neutral fumaric acid, see: Bowes et al. (2003 ▶); Aakeroy et al. (2002 ▶, 2006 ▶, 2007 ▶); Haynes et al. (2006 ▶); Bu et al. (2007 ▶). For literature on C—O bond distances in fumaric acid, see: Liu et al. (2003 ▶). For metal complexes of 4-acetyl­pyridine, see: Steffen & Palenik (1977 ▶); Pang et al. (1994 ▶). For a 4-acetyl­pyridinium salt, see: Kochel (2005 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

2C7H7NO·C4H4O4 M = 358.34 Triclinic, a = 3.9062 (5) Å b = 8.6809 (13) Å c = 13.0909 (18) Å α = 87.925 (4)° β = 89.941 (3)° γ = 83.141 (4)° V = 440.44 (11) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 294 K 0.30 × 0.11 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer Absorption correction: none 3600 measured reflections 1589 independent reflections 798 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.040 wR(F 2) = 0.143 S = 1.18 1589 reflections 124 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809020480/ng2588sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809020480/ng2588Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
2C7H7NO·C4H4O4Z = 1
Mr = 358.34F(000) = 188
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.351 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 3.9062 (5) ÅCell parameters from 2308 reflections
b = 8.6809 (13) Åθ = 3.2–24.6°
c = 13.0909 (18) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
α = 87.925 (4)°T = 294 K
β = 89.941 (3)°Needle, colourless
γ = 83.141 (4)°0.30 × 0.11 × 0.08 mm
V = 440.44 (11) Å3
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID IP diffractometer798 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.030
graphiteθmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −4→4
3600 measured reflectionsk = −10→10
1589 independent reflectionsl = −15→15
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.143w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0527P)2 + 0.048P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.18(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1589 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
124 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.032 (8)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.4491 (6)0.4588 (3)0.69775 (18)0.0630 (7)
O10.8832 (6)0.7499 (3)0.98158 (16)0.0900 (8)
O20.1660 (6)0.1037 (2)0.67034 (15)0.0775 (7)
O30.2584 (6)0.2870 (3)0.55473 (16)0.0764 (7)
C10.5832 (8)0.4178 (4)0.7899 (2)0.0733 (9)
H10.61220.31300.80970.088*
C20.6807 (7)0.5230 (3)0.8573 (2)0.0651 (9)
H20.77650.48940.92040.078*
C30.6342 (6)0.6786 (3)0.82954 (19)0.0494 (7)
C40.4891 (6)0.7228 (3)0.73526 (19)0.0546 (7)
H40.45080.82700.71450.065*
C50.4019 (7)0.6088 (4)0.6724 (2)0.0612 (8)
H50.30480.63910.60890.073*
C60.7453 (7)0.7954 (3)0.9018 (2)0.0562 (8)
C70.6902 (7)0.9624 (3)0.8712 (2)0.0653 (9)
H7A0.79141.02120.92150.098*
H7B0.44740.99610.86640.098*
H7C0.79610.97840.80610.098*
C80.1658 (7)0.1535 (3)0.5833 (2)0.0539 (7)
C90.0643 (7)0.0651 (3)0.4951 (2)0.0561 (8)
H90.09510.10570.42950.067*
H3A0.335 (9)0.337 (5)0.615 (3)0.131 (14)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0771 (16)0.0500 (17)0.0641 (16)−0.0142 (12)−0.0009 (13)−0.0083 (13)
O10.1244 (18)0.0731 (17)0.0703 (14)−0.0004 (13)−0.0407 (14)−0.0077 (12)
O20.1167 (18)0.0640 (15)0.0548 (13)−0.0234 (12)−0.0138 (12)0.0004 (11)
O30.1198 (18)0.0541 (15)0.0607 (13)−0.0313 (13)−0.0048 (12)−0.0076 (11)
C10.096 (2)0.046 (2)0.077 (2)−0.0096 (17)−0.0064 (19)0.0019 (17)
C20.082 (2)0.052 (2)0.0610 (19)−0.0053 (15)−0.0123 (16)0.0030 (15)
C30.0523 (15)0.0448 (18)0.0513 (16)−0.0058 (12)−0.0004 (13)−0.0030 (13)
C40.0682 (17)0.0451 (17)0.0512 (16)−0.0100 (13)−0.0046 (14)−0.0014 (13)
C50.0704 (18)0.057 (2)0.0566 (18)−0.0100 (15)−0.0086 (15)−0.0024 (15)
C60.0577 (16)0.057 (2)0.0541 (18)−0.0048 (13)−0.0047 (14)−0.0051 (14)
C70.0738 (19)0.054 (2)0.070 (2)−0.0163 (15)−0.0083 (16)−0.0077 (16)
C80.0604 (16)0.0446 (18)0.0567 (18)−0.0048 (13)−0.0084 (14)−0.0063 (14)
C90.0680 (17)0.0469 (18)0.0534 (16)−0.0063 (13)−0.0072 (14)−0.0016 (14)
N1—C51.323 (4)C3—C61.512 (4)
N1—C11.335 (4)C4—C51.383 (4)
O1—C61.207 (3)C4—H40.9300
O2—C81.204 (3)C5—H50.9300
O3—C81.297 (3)C6—C71.481 (4)
O3—H3A0.97 (4)C7—H7A0.9600
C1—C21.378 (4)C7—H7B0.9600
C1—H10.9300C7—H7C0.9600
C2—C31.377 (4)C8—C91.488 (4)
C2—H20.9300C9—C9i1.293 (5)
C3—C41.381 (3)C9—H90.9300
C5—N1—C1117.3 (3)C4—C5—H5118.2
C8—O3—H3A108 (2)O1—C6—C7121.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2123.2 (3)O1—C6—C3119.3 (3)
N1—C1—H1118.4C7—C6—C3118.9 (2)
C2—C1—H1118.4C6—C7—H7A109.5
C3—C2—C1118.9 (3)C6—C7—H7B109.5
C3—C2—H2120.5H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C1—C2—H2120.5C6—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C4118.4 (2)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C6119.6 (2)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C3—C6122.0 (3)O2—C8—O3124.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5118.6 (3)O2—C8—C9123.1 (3)
C3—C4—H4120.7O3—C8—C9112.2 (3)
C5—C4—H4120.7C9i—C9—C8123.6 (3)
N1—C5—C4123.5 (3)C9i—C9—H9118.2
N1—C5—H5118.2C8—C9—H9118.2
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3A···N10.98 (4)1.64 (4)2.599 (3)166 (4)
C4—H4···O2ii0.932.573.471 (3)164
C7—H7C···O2iii0.962.583.489 (3)158
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O3—H3A⋯N10.98 (4)1.64 (4)2.599 (3)166 (4)
  5 in total

1.  Salts of maleic and fumaric acids with organic polyamines: comparison of isomeric acids as building blocks in supramolecular chemistry.

Authors:  Katharine F Bowes; George Ferguson; Alan J Lough; Christopher Glidewell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2003-01-28

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Reactivity of dimethyl fumarate and methylhydrogen fumarate towards glutathione and N-acetyl-L-cysteine--preparation of S-substituted thiosuccinic acid esters.

Authors:  Thomas J Schmidt; Muharrem Ak; Ulrich Mrowietz
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  A high-yielding supramolecular reaction.

Authors:  Christer B Aakeröy; Alicia M Beatty; Brian A Helfrich
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Iron absorption from ferrous fumarate in adult women is influenced by ascorbic acid but not by Na2EDTA.

Authors:  Meredith C Fidler; Lena Davidsson; Christophe Zeder; Thomas Walczyk; Richard F Hurrell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.718

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bis(3-hydroxy-pyridinium) fumarate.

Authors:  Lan Shen; Jun-Hua Li; Jing-Jing Nie; Duan-Jun Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-06-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.