Literature DB >> 21581968

2,4-Dichloro-6-methoxy-quinoline.

R Subashini, Venkatesha R Hathwar, P Manivel, K Prabakaran, F Nawaz Khan.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(7)Cl(2)NO, features a planar mol-ecule, excluding the methyl H atoms [maximum deviation = 0.0385 (1) Å]. The crystal packing is stabilized by π-π stacking inter-actions across inversion centres [centroid-to-centroid distance = 3.736 (3) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21581968      PMCID: PMC2968243          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809002402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background, see: Fournet et al. (1981 ▶) and references cited therein; Towers et al. (1981 ▶); Biavatti et al. (2002 ▶); McCormick et al. (1996 ▶); Ziegler & Gelfert, (1959 ▶). For related crystal structures, see: Somvanshi et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H7Cl2NO M = 228.07 Triclinic, a = 7.431 (2) Å b = 8.889 (2) Å c = 9.083 (4) Å α = 116.660 (19)° β = 102.301 (2)° γ = 104.150 (14)° V = 482.5 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.63 mm−1 T = 290 (2) K 0.25 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.811, T max = 0.909 5720 measured reflections 1782 independent reflections 1272 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.054

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.065 wR(F 2) = 0.197 S = 1.15 1782 reflections 128 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.38 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.64 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1999 ▶) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1993 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809002402/bt2852sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809002402/bt2852Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H7Cl2NOZ = 2
Mr = 228.07F(000) = 232
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.570 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.431 (2) ÅCell parameters from 856 reflections
b = 8.889 (2) Åθ = 1.9–20.7°
c = 9.083 (4) ŵ = 0.63 mm1
α = 116.660 (19)°T = 290 K
β = 102.301 (2)°Block, colourless
γ = 104.150 (14)°0.25 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
V = 482.5 (3) Å3
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1782 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1272 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.054
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −5→8
Tmin = 0.811, Tmax = 0.909k = −10→10
5720 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.197H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.15w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0844P)2 + 0.6982P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1782 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
128 parametersΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.64 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.3126 (2)1.55448 (15)0.76004 (16)0.0555 (4)
Cl20.2701 (2)0.98994 (16)0.84707 (16)0.0592 (5)
N10.2689 (5)1.2373 (5)0.5081 (5)0.0400 (9)
O10.2020 (5)0.5198 (4)0.1887 (4)0.0517 (8)
C10.2837 (6)1.3262 (5)0.6714 (6)0.0383 (10)
C20.2849 (6)1.2594 (5)0.7862 (5)0.0382 (9)
H20.29721.33120.90310.046*
C30.2666 (6)1.0805 (6)0.7130 (5)0.0378 (9)
C40.2323 (6)0.7880 (5)0.4545 (6)0.0380 (9)
H40.23180.73050.51840.046*
C50.2168 (6)0.6950 (5)0.2814 (6)0.0392 (10)
C60.2134 (7)0.7815 (6)0.1824 (6)0.0422 (10)
H60.19940.71690.06410.051*
C70.2302 (7)0.9572 (6)0.2591 (6)0.0421 (10)
H70.22941.01190.19260.051*
C80.2489 (6)1.0586 (5)0.4363 (5)0.0350 (9)
C90.2491 (6)0.9716 (5)0.5361 (5)0.0344 (9)
C100.2067 (8)0.4245 (7)0.2807 (7)0.0573 (13)
H10A0.33300.48550.37780.086*
H10B0.18970.30140.20060.086*
H10C0.10070.42280.32540.086*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0789 (9)0.0407 (6)0.0592 (8)0.0310 (6)0.0316 (6)0.0293 (6)
Cl20.0927 (11)0.0533 (7)0.0488 (7)0.0298 (7)0.0288 (6)0.0383 (6)
N10.049 (2)0.0396 (19)0.046 (2)0.0226 (17)0.0195 (17)0.0300 (17)
O10.070 (2)0.0391 (16)0.0490 (18)0.0252 (16)0.0202 (16)0.0246 (15)
C10.038 (2)0.035 (2)0.047 (2)0.0168 (18)0.0141 (19)0.0248 (19)
C20.038 (2)0.044 (2)0.038 (2)0.0176 (19)0.0164 (18)0.0234 (19)
C30.040 (2)0.042 (2)0.041 (2)0.0169 (18)0.0150 (18)0.0284 (19)
C40.039 (2)0.039 (2)0.044 (2)0.0151 (18)0.0138 (19)0.0295 (19)
C50.039 (2)0.035 (2)0.045 (2)0.0148 (18)0.0130 (19)0.0232 (19)
C60.053 (3)0.045 (2)0.036 (2)0.023 (2)0.0185 (19)0.0234 (19)
C70.055 (3)0.044 (2)0.042 (2)0.025 (2)0.020 (2)0.030 (2)
C80.036 (2)0.037 (2)0.038 (2)0.0151 (17)0.0127 (17)0.0239 (18)
C90.032 (2)0.036 (2)0.039 (2)0.0127 (17)0.0127 (17)0.0235 (18)
C100.070 (3)0.048 (3)0.074 (3)0.028 (2)0.030 (3)0.043 (3)
Cl1—C11.749 (4)C4—C91.415 (5)
Cl2—C31.734 (4)C4—H40.9300
N1—C11.293 (5)C5—C61.422 (6)
N1—C81.372 (5)C6—C71.352 (6)
O1—C51.359 (5)C6—H60.9300
O1—C101.433 (5)C7—C81.402 (6)
C1—C21.412 (5)C7—H70.9300
C2—C31.377 (6)C8—C91.432 (5)
C2—H20.9300C10—H10A0.9600
C3—C91.411 (6)C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C51.370 (6)C10—H10C0.9600
C1—N1—C8117.4 (3)C7—C6—H6119.8
C5—O1—C10117.2 (4)C5—C6—H6119.8
N1—C1—C2126.7 (4)C6—C7—C8121.6 (4)
N1—C1—Cl1116.3 (3)C6—C7—H7119.2
C2—C1—Cl1117.0 (3)C8—C7—H7119.2
C3—C2—C1115.3 (4)N1—C8—C7119.1 (3)
C3—C2—H2122.3N1—C8—C9122.6 (4)
C1—C2—H2122.3C7—C8—C9118.3 (4)
C2—C3—C9122.4 (3)C3—C9—C4125.0 (4)
C2—C3—Cl2117.9 (3)C3—C9—C8115.5 (3)
C9—C3—Cl2119.6 (3)C4—C9—C8119.5 (4)
C5—C4—C9120.1 (4)O1—C10—H10A109.5
C5—C4—H4120.0O1—C10—H10B109.5
C9—C4—H4120.0H10A—C10—H10B109.5
O1—C5—C4125.8 (4)O1—C10—H10C109.5
O1—C5—C6114.1 (4)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C4—C5—C6120.0 (4)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C7—C6—C5120.5 (4)
C8—N1—C1—C21.2 (6)C1—N1—C8—C9−1.6 (6)
C8—N1—C1—Cl1179.1 (3)C6—C7—C8—N1178.9 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C3−0.6 (6)C6—C7—C8—C9−0.2 (7)
Cl1—C1—C2—C3−178.5 (3)C2—C3—C9—C4179.2 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C90.4 (6)Cl2—C3—C9—C40.4 (6)
C1—C2—C3—Cl2179.2 (3)C2—C3—C9—C8−0.8 (6)
C10—O1—C5—C4−1.2 (6)Cl2—C3—C9—C8−179.6 (3)
C10—O1—C5—C6179.3 (4)C5—C4—C9—C3−179.8 (4)
C9—C4—C5—O1179.3 (4)C5—C4—C9—C80.3 (6)
C9—C4—C5—C6−1.3 (6)N1—C8—C9—C31.5 (6)
O1—C5—C6—C7−178.9 (4)C7—C8—C9—C3−179.5 (4)
C4—C5—C6—C71.6 (7)N1—C8—C9—C4−178.6 (4)
C5—C6—C7—C8−0.8 (7)C7—C8—C9—C40.5 (6)
C1—N1—C8—C7179.3 (4)
  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  HIV inhibitory natural products. 26. Quinoline alkaloids from Euodia roxburghiana.

Authors:  J L McCormick; T C McKee; J H Cardellina; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.050

3.  Phototoxic furanoquinolines of the Rutaceae.

Authors:  G H Towers; E A Graham; I D Spenser; Z Abramowski
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  2-substituted quinoline alkaloids as potential antileishmanial drugs.

Authors:  A Fournet; A A Barrios; V Muñoz; R Hocquemiller; A Cavé; J Bruneton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Ethyl 6-chloro-2-methyl-4-phenyl-quinoline-3-carboxyl-ate.

Authors:  R Subashini; F Nawaz Khan; Suganya Mittal; Venkatesha R Hathwar; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-04

2.  Ethyl 6-chloro-2-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2-dihydro-quinoline-3-carboxyl-ate.

Authors:  F Nawaz Khan; Suganya Mittal; Soheil Anjum; Venkatesha R Hathwar; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-04

3.  2,4-Dichloro-7,8-dimethyl-quinoline.

Authors:  R Subashini; F Nawaz Khan; T Rajashekar Reddy; Venkatesha R Hathwar; Mehmet Akkurt
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-06-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.